Jump to content


In Ear Monitors - help needed...


743 replies to this topic

#631 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 07 January 2017 - 01:58 PM

View Postmrtcat, on 06 January 2017 - 06:23 AM, said:

My UE900s arrived yesterday. Got them from Toby deals for £174.99 inc delivery but the trade off is it took 12 days for them to arrive.
As mentioned before I've been using mee m6s until now. Initial impressions are that the UE900s are a big step up. Just a much stronger, more balanced and more detailed sound with bass that is solid and not boomy. Not as comfortable as I had hoped but I'm having them re-shelled into custom moulds at the end of the month anyway so a moot point for me. I'll update once that's done.
oh thats' good to hear.

One of the slight things with IEM is it's not easy to try lots out! I went for the ue900s in my choice between them and the cheaper mee m6s ... sounds like I made the right choice.
I found they're not the most comfortable things I've worn!

What's the craic with reshelling?

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#632 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 07 January 2017 - 02:31 PM

http://www.custom-in...r-monitors.html

Check the above for reshelling in the UK through Paul at the CIEM company. You'll need to get some impressions done of your ears... choose your design... submit your donor IEMs... and wait.

Payment will factor into there at some point too! :P

#633 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 10 January 2017 - 03:34 PM

Used them at practice last night - freakingly i could hear everything! :)

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#634 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 10 January 2017 - 04:32 PM

View PostLukeFRC, on 10 January 2017 - 03:34 PM, said:

Used them at practice last night - freakingly i could hear everything! :)

A good result!

#635 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 10 January 2017 - 07:42 PM

Aye, I was at work, and lunch ended so couldn't type more...

Sounded great - the bottom end wasn't amazing so need to work on how well they fit, but everything was there and audible.
If anything it made me realise all the mistakes of my playing - the shock of hearing everything - combined with the first time with a new drummer meant it wasn't a stressless experience - but for the first time ever I could hear everything. We have the Allen and Heath setup which lets you do your own mix, and as normal its fairly hard to get the mix sounding balanced.

But everything also was a lot quieter in my ears. :)

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#636 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 10 January 2017 - 09:32 PM

View PostLukeFRC, on 10 January 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:

Aye, I was at work, and lunch ended so couldn't type more...

Sounded great - the bottom end wasn't amazing so need to work on how well they fit, but everything was there and audible.
If anything it made me realise all the mistakes of my playing - the shock of hearing everything - combined with the first time with a new drummer meant it wasn't a stressless experience - but for the first time ever I could hear everything. We have the Allen and Heath setup which lets you do your own mix, and as normal its fairly hard to get the mix sounding balanced.

But everything also was a lot quieter in my ears. :)

The mix will balance out over time, with every time you use it, the amount of tweaking between playing will get less and less.

Presume that you are on a QU? Remember, you have compression and EQ available, so make use of it to help you hear what you need... but as you state, make sure the fit is good in your ears as a starting point.

#637 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 10 January 2017 - 11:28 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 10 January 2017 - 09:32 PM, said:



The mix will balance out over time, with every time you use it, the amount of tweaking between playing will get less and less.

Presume that you are on a QU? Remember, you have compression and EQ available, so make use of it to help you hear what you need... but as you state, make sure the fit is good in your ears as a starting point.
QU?

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#638 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 11 January 2017 - 08:57 AM

Qu - range of Allen and Heath digital mixers.

#639 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 11 January 2017 - 08:11 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 11 January 2017 - 08:57 AM, said:

Qu - range of Allen and Heath digital mixers.
ahh GLD 80 I think it is and we have the ME-1 units.
It's a church. The compression and EQ is really really good - the PA team's ability to use it less so... :(

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#640 owen

    Low achiever.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,471 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 January 2017 - 08:13 PM

View PostLukeFRC, on 11 January 2017 - 08:11 PM, said:

the PA team's ability to use it less so... :(

We resemble that remark!
Double Bass, it's an airfix kit waiting to happen.

http://soundcloud.com/owen-lloyd-evans

Feedback

#641 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 11 January 2017 - 09:47 PM

View PostLukeFRC, on 11 January 2017 - 08:11 PM, said:

ahh GLD 80 I think it is and we have the ME-1 units.
It's a church. The compression and EQ is really really good - the PA team's ability to use it less so... :(
I have the GLD80 - no excuse for poor monitor mixes then!

The ME-1s are great little units too (alas I don't have any but have tried them - don't really lend themselves to wireless use)

Edited by EBS_freak, 12 January 2017 - 02:21 AM.


#642 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 11 January 2017 - 09:48 PM

The problem is with digital desks is it is so easy to do drastic eq that on a physical control would be moving it towards the edge of its travel - digital it's harder to be subtle is you're not so expert in what you're doing - that's my theory anyway

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#643 LukeFRC

    Needs to get out more

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,841 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds

Posted 11 January 2017 - 09:51 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 11 January 2017 - 09:47 PM, said:


I have the GLD80 - no excuse for poor monitor mixes then!

The ME1s are great little units too (alas I don't have any but have tried them - don't really lend themselves to wireless use)
we do our own mixes - the problem is it's post gain and eq on the board - so if the room eq needs much eq then it changes dramatically in my ears - ideally I would have a tiny bit more control over my sound

'81 L1000

'91 Streamer
'85 Thumb

Mesa Walkabout


feedback


#644 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 12 January 2017 - 01:48 AM

View PostLukeFRC, on 11 January 2017 - 09:48 PM, said:

The problem is with digital desks is it is so easy to do drastic eq that on a physical control would be moving it towards the edge of its travel - digital it's harder to be subtle is you're not so expert in what you're doing - that's my theory anyway
Drastic - I guess... the EQs are certainly a lot more powerful than traditional analogue desks in that they have sweepable frequency points and Q over the standard fixed settings normally found. So yes, more powerful... but more potential for poor decisions!

With the additional sweepable HPF points, you can get some incredibly good mud free mixes that just aren't possible without a load of outboard in the analogue world. I'm not sure why anybody would choose anything but a digital desk in a live environment in today's world.

View PostLukeFRC, on 11 January 2017 - 09:51 PM, said:

we do our own mixes - the problem is it's post gain and eq on the board - so if the room eq needs much eq then it changes dramatically in my ears - ideally I would have a tiny bit more control over my sound
It sounds like your routing isn't right - off the top of my head, so forgive me if I am a little hazy, on your desk, hit the IO button on the top right. I think theres a tab called something like Mon or Monitor there on the screen that comes up. Hit that tab on the screen. The screen should show Direct Out for each channel. Ensure that everything is Direct out and corresponding to a channel (e.g Dir Out 1 is on Channel 1, Dir Out 2 is on channel 2) and ensure that you are in ME-1 mode, not Aviom mode. (I'm guessing you are in ME-1 mode already if you ME-1s are working).

Then push the processing button, again at the top right of the desk. Click the Routing tab on the screen and then the Direct Out tab. Push the select (SEL) button on the 1st channel strip for channel input 1. The screen should update showing the corresponding info for that channel.

At the bottom of that screen, I think you'll see a pop up bar (I think it's yellow) and it will say something like Direct Out Source, or Dir Out Src or something like that. If you press that, a little screen will appear with two boxes and a drop down. Ensure that the follow fader is not enabled. This means that your ME-1 is not influenced by the position of the fader for the front of house. The follow mute button configures whether muting the channel front of house should also mute the channel on the ME1. Have it pressed as you require. As for the drop down, choose the appropriate output for your needs - if you are complaining about the EQ, it sounds like you need to select a direct out point above the Post PEQ option.For example, if you chose the Post Preamp option, that should feed you the dry signal (before it hits the EQ processing) straight to your ME-1. I think there is a HPF direct out point... you may find that a good option to keep the mud out of your mix. You may need to experiment with these. I know there is a gating option - which can be great for keeping drums sounding great front of house - but may find a bit annoying in your in-ears.

Oh yeah, you'll need to repeat this configuration for every channel.

I suspect you are on follow fader/post delay at the moment... and hence why you are hearing the funky EQ and volume fluctuations with any move of the front of house faders.

To be honest, I prefer mixing off an aux and an iPad (I know the numbers are more limited that way due to you using output busses) than the ME-1 but there are some things you may want to consider depending upon how confident you are in configuring the desk and how many channels you have free. (This is applicable for both ME-1 and Aux mixing) - For a single high channel desk where a large proportion of the channels aren't being used, I will say have 24 channels for front of house and 24 channels for monitoring. You can digitally split the input from your AR2412 to a couple of channels - say input 1 goes to channel 1 and channel 25. What this means is that you can EQ say, a vocal, for front of house, on channel 1, and the EQ for your ME-1s on channel 25 - your direct outs on 25 can then be Post the EQ but still pre fader... but you have the advantage of hearing the processing in your monitor mix. What you are effectively doing now is running a front of house mixer and monitor mixer in one desk. I think I have talked about previously when talking about the inears mix that I recorded off my DL32R - exactly same concept.

It's all good fun but a bit complex if you haven't done it before and a bit of a minefield if you aren't familiar with configuring mixing desks.

View PostLukeFRC, on 10 January 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:

and as normal its fairly hard to get the mix sounding balanced
If you fix the above, I would wager you'll find it a lot easier to mix your own inears... because at the moment, any tweaks front of house is definitely going to mess up your mix!

Hope that your sound guys get used to the desk - it's got too much to offer not to make the most of it. Controlling via DCA is really powerful... and the fx engine is really strong. It's a great desk - although having said that, it looks like they have decided to EOL it given their new announcements for NAMM and the fact that they are keeping silent over any firmware updates to fix the outstanding bugs... grr... :(

Anyway, hope this helps to fix your ME-1 issues* and good luck!

*I know that church PA guys are usually very precious and don't let anybody near the "complex (complex because they don't understand) and expensive" equipment... so hopefully you can get somebody on side to help get your changes applied.

Edited by EBS_freak, 12 January 2017 - 07:49 AM.


#645 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 12 January 2017 - 11:55 PM

OmeDunk - any news on your new IEMs?

#646 OmeDunk

    Fully fledged member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 13 January 2017 - 04:53 PM

On their way to the cold and wet lowlands
Fender PB RI-70, Maruszczyk Jake & Lakland 55-01
Shuttle 9.0, Kelly all valve PA
Genz Uber 115 & Barefaced Midget

IEM: Rolls PM 351 & Orchid DI
MS-60B

My feedback

#647 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 13 January 2017 - 05:01 PM

View PostOmeDunk, on 13 January 2017 - 04:53 PM, said:

On their way to the cold and wet lowlands
Not too long from now then? Looking forward to hearing your appraisal of them and how they compare to what you are currently using as a benchmark.

#648 OmeDunk

    Fully fledged member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 13 January 2017 - 05:33 PM

Aprox 10 working days
Fender PB RI-70, Maruszczyk Jake & Lakland 55-01
Shuttle 9.0, Kelly all valve PA
Genz Uber 115 & Barefaced Midget

IEM: Rolls PM 351 & Orchid DI
MS-60B

My feedback

#649 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 19 January 2017 - 02:47 PM

New toys -



Glorified headphone amp right?

Edited by EBS_freak, 19 January 2017 - 02:49 PM.


#650 mcnach

    Honey Badger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,226 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh
  • Interests:All things musical and bass in particular

Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:55 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 04 January 2017 - 09:08 AM, said:

There's not really a lot of competition at that price point, especially when we are talking quad drive balanced armatures. There's the XBA40s if you can find them... otherwise you are stepping up to say the Westone WD40s. Should probably point out that the competition in balanced armature designs is very tight - there are only really Knowles and Sonion in the balanced armature manufacture game, so likelihood whatever you buy will be made from those, or a combination of those. What you are paying for is the sound signature (e.g. tuning and crossover design - that for most are actually passive and made up via tube dampening and tube length, only a few have electronic crossovers in place) and the casing. The UE900s are defo the bargains... and considering that they are from UE (who are certainly up there in terms of IEM front runners), they are not to be sniffed at despite them having been on the market for some time. There is a reason why they haven't been discontinued - they are great.

These have also been on my radar of late - http://www.mi.com/en/headphonesprohd/ - only out since the end of 2016...

Dynamic in the lows so should give better response than a single BA (remember I always suggest at least a dual low when using balanced armatures because balanced armatures have less headroom) - http://www.ebay.co.u...725.m3641.l6368

(Easiest place to source is probably eBay as they are not officially available outside of the US)

They are cheap enough to give them a whirl, right?


I'm reading this thread with interest as we're talking in my band about in-ears, and if we don't all do it I am definitely considering purchasing some gear to allow me to use in-ears... and this thread (and others) have been very useful. I'm still having 1001 questions but... getting there ;)

Anyway, I am not writing about all that... I'm writing about the Xiaomi earphones in the link above. I was interested in getting some that sounded half decent and I thought why not. So I got a pair of those.

First impression wasn't incredible. A lot of treble, so much so that I EQ'd it decreasing treble progressively above 4KHz. The bass wasn't particularly impressive either. It was there but it didn't have the definition I was hoping for.
HOWEVER!
I was really struggling with the actual buds. Poor fit in my ears. It's not the first time... I seem to have unusual ears or something. The Xiaomi come with 4 pairs of buds. None fit well. The least bad were the ones that came already installed. I find the rubber material too slippery, it just doesn't stay in my ear and if I shake my head they come loose. They also make my ears feel hot, tired, after half an hour or so... maybe because I try so hard to get them in place and stay there...
Very disappointing.
So I took the buds that came with my Sony earphones (they were around £40, I can't recall the model). They are the worst Sony earphones I've owned... but the buds are better for me, although still not ideal. I installed the Sony buds on the Xiaomi... woah! BIG difference.
The treble is no longer annoying and I reset the EQ flat. The bass... there's quite a bit of it, but the most important part is that it has a much more defined sound.
I was using a couple of Lettuce albums that I know well to assess the sound... funky, nice horns, keyboards, effects, wah guitars... I won't say they're the best earphones ever, but at around £35 including delivery I'm very happy with this. They feel reasonably well made although I wish for a more substantial cable, but it's still a LOT better than the Sony.

I guess it makes a big difference to use the right buds. The ones I am using now are ok, but I could get a better fit, so I'll investigate and see if I can find something that fits better.

I'm not sure how well they would work as for IEM, these buds don't block as much external noise as you'd want for that, but they're nice cheap earphones that sound probably better than most in the price range, and I'm glad I read this thread :)

Edit: they also don't leak as much sound out as I expected, pretty quiet outside your ears at the volumes I like, which is great

Edited by mcnach, 20 January 2017 - 10:09 AM.

.
bass player with Sea Bass Kid - http://www.facebook.com/seabasskid & http://www.seabasskid.org

and ska/reggae band Urang Matang - https://www.facebook.com/urang.matang & http://www.urangmatang.com


(1) MusicMan Stingray (2002, 2EQ - now with John East MMSR 3-band preamp), natural with maple fingerboard.
(2) MusicMan SUB (2003, 2EQ). white/rosewood
(3) Squier Jazz (1994) red, with J-Retro
(4) Maruszczyk Jake 4 P/JJ (2015), natural, maple fingerboard
(5) Fender Precision Classic 50 (2014), fiesta red, maple fingerboard

and also:
Maruszczyk Jake 4 revP (2015), red, maple fingerboard / Maruszczyk Jake 4 Jazz (2017), trans-purple/maple / Squier Precision JJ Matt Freeman (2014) vintage white & maple
JHS Vintage EJM96 Jazz (2005), black/rosewood / Squier Precision Mike Dirnt (2007) olympic white maple / Sue Ryder RP-1 (2011) fretless white /
-
MarkBass LM3 (2009) +
TKS S112 (x2) / Barefaced Two10 (x2)
Busking amp: QTX QR10PA (rechargeable battery)
-

FEEDBACK: My feedback thread is here

#651 OmeDunk

    Fully fledged member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:59 PM

UE Sound Tap: Indeed, glorified headphone amp.

Through function for line or speaker signal in jack or speakon is nice though

Edited by OmeDunk, 19 January 2017 - 08:00 PM.

Fender PB RI-70, Maruszczyk Jake & Lakland 55-01
Shuttle 9.0, Kelly all valve PA
Genz Uber 115 & Barefaced Midget

IEM: Rolls PM 351 & Orchid DI
MS-60B

My feedback

#652 mcnach

    Honey Badger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,226 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh
  • Interests:All things musical and bass in particular

Posted 20 January 2017 - 10:08 AM

View PostEBS_freak, on 19 January 2017 - 02:47 PM, said:

New toys -



Glorified headphone amp right?

Hmmm, I actually like that, as it would provide a relatively cheap and uncomplicated way to get into IEM... but I'd like an aux input that you could mix with the wedge input too. Pretty much everywhere I play I could select one of the wedges (which one it'll depend on which mix I like best, but probably usually the singer's one), and then use the headphone output of my OmniCabSim into the SoundTap, mixing it with the wedge mix to my liking. It would be a wired system, which is not ideal, but it would be simple, something that even I can understand... and I don't need to depend on other people or begging for mixer aux outputs etc ;)

.
bass player with Sea Bass Kid - http://www.facebook.com/seabasskid & http://www.seabasskid.org

and ska/reggae band Urang Matang - https://www.facebook.com/urang.matang & http://www.urangmatang.com


(1) MusicMan Stingray (2002, 2EQ - now with John East MMSR 3-band preamp), natural with maple fingerboard.
(2) MusicMan SUB (2003, 2EQ). white/rosewood
(3) Squier Jazz (1994) red, with J-Retro
(4) Maruszczyk Jake 4 P/JJ (2015), natural, maple fingerboard
(5) Fender Precision Classic 50 (2014), fiesta red, maple fingerboard

and also:
Maruszczyk Jake 4 revP (2015), red, maple fingerboard / Maruszczyk Jake 4 Jazz (2017), trans-purple/maple / Squier Precision JJ Matt Freeman (2014) vintage white & maple
JHS Vintage EJM96 Jazz (2005), black/rosewood / Squier Precision Mike Dirnt (2007) olympic white maple / Sue Ryder RP-1 (2011) fretless white /
-
MarkBass LM3 (2009) +
TKS S112 (x2) / Barefaced Two10 (x2)
Busking amp: QTX QR10PA (rechargeable battery)
-

FEEDBACK: My feedback thread is here

#653 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 20 January 2017 - 10:12 AM

View Postmcnach, on 20 January 2017 - 10:08 AM, said:

Hmmm, I actually like that, as it would provide a relatively cheap and uncomplicated way to get into IEM... but I'd like an aux input that you could mix with the wedge input too. Pretty much everywhere I play I could select one of the wedges (which one it'll depend on which mix I like best, but probably usually the singer's one), and then use the headphone output of my OmniCabSim into the SoundTap, mixing it with the wedge mix to my liking. It would be a wired system, which is not ideal, but it would be simple, something that even I can understand... and I don't need to depend on other people or begging for mixer aux outputs etc ;)

You just need a sub mixer to add the "more me" functionality... they've missed a trick with that one.

#654 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 20 January 2017 - 10:59 AM

In fact, thinking about this, you could fashion your own with a small mixer and something like a Palmer PDI09 (enables you to take a balanced feed from a speaker feed).

#655 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 21 January 2017 - 01:27 AM

I've been wondering whether to post this or not... but I have decided it's too cool not too. Some guys who actually follow my crap talking across this site (and maybe others) will have probably seem me mention the Subpac - basically a body worn subwoofer. There's a couple of problems with it - it's only available as a big vest (which will make you look a bit daft on stage) or as a chair back. It's also pretty darn expensive. So, I've been kind of looking at different options... and also been working on developing my own... however, I stopped pursuing that idea as I found out that some guys were already working on something very, very similar to what I was working on. Basically, what I was working on, quickly crossed paths with haptic feedback devices... so I decided to actually have a bigger look at who was using the components that I was looking at... and see what was going on in the market there.

Anyway, the thing I want to share with you is the Woojer devices...

Check this out.



So what's great about this, is that Woojer has developed a strap, in addition to the standard vest. It kinda looks portable enough to wear under stagewear without looking ridiculous. I notice in the videos that people wear the strap either on the upper part or lower part of the torso... so certainly, it would be a lot less conspicuous that the vest option.



The funny thing is, I'm not entirely sure that these guys have clocked onto how great their product could be in the IEM sector.

So, heres the rub... I'm kind of sold on it - but don't tend to recommend stuff to people without having first hand knowledge of it. I *think* this could be really good... and I think that this is the answer to those people who feel that they lose the connection of a load of air moving on stage. In reality, I don't know... but it look promising.

But... check this out (and I promise I am not being paid to advertise or anything) - http://www.woojer.com/store/ - it's introductory price with postage puts it circa £100. Now, it's kinda cheap enough for those serious about IEM to give it a whirl... as when the price goes up to full retail after the initial introductory price, £200 is a bit steep on a whim with no reviews to back it up.

I've bought one... but for those that are kinda sold on the idea too, I've posted this so you have the opportunity to get in on the cheaper price. Of course, when I get it when they are shipped, I'll give it my full appraisal.

Edited by EBS_freak, 21 January 2017 - 01:44 AM.


#656 OmeDunk

    Fully fledged member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 21 January 2017 - 07:48 AM

Very interesting.
Thanks for sharing.

Do you know how the input and output work?
Is there an input for yout device and an output for your IEM?

Edited by OmeDunk, 21 January 2017 - 07:55 AM.

Fender PB RI-70, Maruszczyk Jake & Lakland 55-01
Shuttle 9.0, Kelly all valve PA
Genz Uber 115 & Barefaced Midget

IEM: Rolls PM 351 & Orchid DI
MS-60B

My feedback

#657 EBS_freak

    Those bubbles aren't coming from the snorkel...

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tickled Trout

Posted 21 January 2017 - 08:02 AM

View PostOmeDunk, on 21 January 2017 - 07:48 AM, said:

Very interesting.
Thanks for sharing.

Do you know how the input and output work?
Is there an input for yout device and an output for your IEM?
Correct!

#658 mcnach

    Honey Badger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,226 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh
  • Interests:All things musical and bass in particular

Posted 21 January 2017 - 01:00 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 20 January 2017 - 10:59 AM, said:

In fact, thinking about this, you could fashion your own with a small mixer and something like a Palmer PDI09 (enables you to take a balanced feed from a speaker feed).

Hmmm... I have to investigate.

I was even thinking of something like what Dood suggested in another thread... and mix my Zoom H2 onstage to capture the ambience and general band sound, with the headphone output of my OmniCabSim, as a rudimentary IEM test. On my main band I use a tiny pedalboard that is generally either on top of my amp or on the floor by my cab on the side, so I may be able to set it all up with minimum fuss and cabling.

It's not going to be anything like what you guys get... but all too often it gets too noisy on the stages I play, and earplugs protect me but I sometimes can't hear much, and I don't want to make things harder by just turning up up my amp onstage since it generally just makes things worse... I don't really want to be wired, but maybe that is enough to give me a more enjoyable experience and meanwhile I keep learning so that I can decide what I really need, as a decent IEM system, wireless, is not exactly cheap.

.
bass player with Sea Bass Kid - http://www.facebook.com/seabasskid & http://www.seabasskid.org

and ska/reggae band Urang Matang - https://www.facebook.com/urang.matang & http://www.urangmatang.com


(1) MusicMan Stingray (2002, 2EQ - now with John East MMSR 3-band preamp), natural with maple fingerboard.
(2) MusicMan SUB (2003, 2EQ). white/rosewood
(3) Squier Jazz (1994) red, with J-Retro
(4) Maruszczyk Jake 4 P/JJ (2015), natural, maple fingerboard
(5) Fender Precision Classic 50 (2014), fiesta red, maple fingerboard

and also:
Maruszczyk Jake 4 revP (2015), red, maple fingerboard / Maruszczyk Jake 4 Jazz (2017), trans-purple/maple / Squier Precision JJ Matt Freeman (2014) vintage white & maple
JHS Vintage EJM96 Jazz (2005), black/rosewood / Squier Precision Mike Dirnt (2007) olympic white maple / Sue Ryder RP-1 (2011) fretless white /
-
MarkBass LM3 (2009) +
TKS S112 (x2) / Barefaced Two10 (x2)
Busking amp: QTX QR10PA (rechargeable battery)
-

FEEDBACK: My feedback thread is here

#659 pete.young

    Hyper elite member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,903 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ipswich

Posted 21 January 2017 - 08:07 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 21 January 2017 - 08:02 AM, said:

Correct!
So if this works, would I be right in thinking that you wouldn't need to spend lots of money on expensive ear buds with multiple drivers, because you wouldn't need to reproduce the bass frequencies with in ears?
Feedback: http://basschat.co.u...-for-peteyoung/
"Just another crouton, floating on the bouillabaisse of life"

#660 owen

    Low achiever.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,471 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 January 2017 - 08:24 PM

View PostEBS_freak, on 21 January 2017 - 01:27 AM, said:

I've bought one... but for those that are kinda sold on the idea too, I've posted this so you have the opportunity to get in on the cheaper price. Of course, when I get it when they are shipped, I'll give it my full appraisal.

I'm in.
Double Bass, it's an airfix kit waiting to happen.

http://soundcloud.com/owen-lloyd-evans

Feedback





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users