Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bottom F#. I need one. Where?


Owen
 Share

Recommended Posts

Like this??

[url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rotosound-RS66LH-STAINLESS-STEEL-BASS-STRINGS-85-175-F-drop-zone-plus-/271183236901?pt=Guitar_Accessories&hash=item3f23c7cf25"]http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rotosound-RS66LH-STAINLESS-STEEL-BASS-STRINGS-85-175-F-drop-zone-plus-/271183236901?pt=Guitar_Accessories&hash=item3f23c7cf25[/url]

Need to find a Rotosound stockist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='TheGreek' timestamp='1411575124' post='2560841']
Like this??

[url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rotosound-RS66LH-STAINLESS-STEEL-BASS-STRINGS-85-175-F-drop-zone-plus-/271183236901?pt=Guitar_Accessories&hash=item3f23c7cf25"]http://www.ebay.co.u...=item3f23c7cf25[/url]

Need to find a Rotosound stockist
[/quote]

The pure thought of a set that low scares me. I'll stick to 125 for a low A# for now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JTUK' timestamp='1409947910' post='2544976']
[size=5][sub]I would talk to Newtone to see if there are any issues with the tension the neck has to take.[/sub][/size]
[/quote]

A F# string will be lower tension than a low B (or a standard E string). You made actually have to slacken off the truss rod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up a Warwick .175 one which is OK but is tonally out of whack with the rest of the strings on the bass. I have ordered a set from Newtone and then I will mess with it for a bit to see if I can even get my head round an extra string. I can play a 5 without thinking. I can play a 4 without thinking. I have a feeling I will have to think while playing a 6. I am not keen on thinking while I play. I might even have to practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='woodyratm' timestamp='1411569139' post='2560744']
I have a rough question kinda in the same vein...

I want to use my 4 string lakland at drop A (AEAD) - what kinda gauge would be needed for this? Best to get a 5 string set and ditch the high string? Will I need to likely need to file the nut? It's 34" scale.
[/quote]

That should work fine. I strung my Jazz that way for a long time. It just depends on the nut really. Only one way to find out :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='sifi2112' timestamp='1411594106' post='2561090']
I've one for sale but Dingwall scale length ....?
[/quote]

Ugh! I wish! If I were to go for it properly I guess I would go fanned fret, but my £220 35" scale neck through Harley Benton will have to do for now. We do actually live in a wonderful age of lutherie - there is not a great deal wrong with it apart from being a bit heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very serious about it! I am awaiting delivery of a set of roundwound strings for my NS EUB to be tuned an octave beneath standard 4 string tuning. Excited does not even begin to describe it. I am dangerously close to fretting an EUB for the ultimate scale length.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I just thought I'd chime back in on this post as I am super pleased with my new F sharp string! - So for ages, I've been stuck using 175 gauge strings that have been good, but I've since learned that they were WAY off in terms of 'ability'. So, I ended up chatting with Chris from Kalium strings the other day about wanting to drop tune my seven string down a tone from it's F sharp note and what gauges of strings I should be thinking about.

After a natter, I ended up ordering a couple of samples to try out on my Shuker 7. They arrived on Friday - super fats delivery from the US and the first is on my bass already. I am so pleased that there has been a marked difference in the quality of the note, tone and volume of the open string as well as a much firmer feel.

I have a 182 string for standard F sharp tuning that I can drop tune, or for a permanent E tuning I also have a 190 gauge. IT IS HUGE in comparison to the 175 I had been using!

I must send a message of thanks through to Kalium; it's safe to say that my Shuker has a new lease of life!

Hang on, let me see if I can upload a pic....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dood' timestamp='1413211503' post='2575852']
Here ya go!!! 183 and a standard 130-30 6 string bass set. Low F sharp up to C
[/quote]

have just got a set of the roto's for my incoming 6er 175 low string which im looking to try for my low E as we tune down a step,

bit scary to think i might need to go for the 190!!!

andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dood' timestamp='1413211503' post='2575852']
Here ya go!!! 183 and a standard 130-30 6 string bass set. Low F sharp up to C
[/quote]

34" or 35" scale? I seem to recall 34".

I went .043 .051 .068 .089 .118 .160 (taper core on the 160) from Newtone and they feel pretty good at the moment. This is on a neck through 35" scale. Obviously I now have Dingwall 6 string GAS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I spoke to Chris at Kalium about the best gauge to use for my bass and indeed it is a 34" scale. However as those in the know will attest, my 7 string is no ordinary 34"er. The 175 I used for many years and looking back I wish I did this a long time ago. Really is a marked difference in the actual volume and note definition between my old string and these new ones. I would expect that Newtone's 160, which can be custom tailored, is superb but I think I'm am of the converted. The 190 will go on if I decide to leave the bass in that drop E tuning.

Interestingly my Dingwall, with it's 37" B string is so far staying in standard tuning. I want to get myself a combustion which will take the drop tunings instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1411584777' post='2560963']
A F# string will be lower tension than a low B (or a standard E string). You made actually have to slacken off the truss rod.
[/quote]

Not necessarily - but worth checking. For example, Kalium's 130 gauge tuned to B comes in at 36lbs and the F# string I have (182) comes in at 38.8lbs. The gauge of the string and it's core design matters, but I do agree that the 175 on an F# is a floppy lower tension string than any B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...