Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Looking for helpful comments on band's first recording


ChrisJaxon
 Share

Recommended Posts

Our band is making a demo disk, just to help get gigs etc. We wanted a fairly 'live' sounding recording. Our first song which is being mixed is attached.

I think it is a bit 'muddy'. Keyboards too far forward, snare too far back (not snappy?)...any comments much appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ChrisJaxon' timestamp='1465246742' post='3066536']...any comments much appreciated!
[/quote]

Not much wrong with that, especially if it was (I assume..?) a 'live' take, all together..? It's got an authentic 'live' sound to it, with a nice (to me...) '70s feel. If you want to adjust, it's micro-measures, not tablespoonfuls. A tad (1-2 db..?) less keys..? Why not, but there's a healthy Al Kooper vibe in there. Snap on the snare..? Yes, maybe a tad, but it mustn't distract from the rest.
If I wanted to improve things, I'd go for a slightly wider stereo spread each side of the vocal.
Frankly, I'd say there was more lost in porting it to mp3 than much else. It's difficult to be more specific from that source; the mastering will make all the difference. If that's done correctly, that's not just a demo; it's good for release. If it's still being mixed, I'd say you're nearly there. Maybe give it a couple of day's rest and come back with fresh ears..? I was comparing with Youtubes of Butterfield Blues Band, Al Kooper, Mike Bloomfield etc; for sound quality your lot came out winners. Micro-measures, not spoonfuls.

Edited by Dad3353
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Douglas,

Many thanks for your comments. It was indeed a live take, with guide vocals which were then added afterwards (to avoid bleed into the vocals). Good point about the stereo spread, it would enhance it a little. Bearing in mind most landlords etc will either be listening on a smart phone, cd player or on the pub system, I guess it will not need so much tweaking!

Once we have this one right we will copy the settings onto the other 4 tracks we put down and see what happens. We did 5 songs in 4 hours, which we were pretty pleased about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything Dad says, sounds great. It sounds like there are two keys parts most of the way through? I'd probably pan them on opposite sides to free up some more space in the middle. Other than that, maybe a bit more reverb on the vocals or a bit of slap-back? But I'd whack a big dollop of master compression on there first, to see how it all sounds when it's loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for those suggestions. Yes the Hammond was added afterwards to fill it out, with the Rhodes sound alone it was a bit thin. Good idea to pan them each side. When mastering is finished I will put up the 5 songs for your delectation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='cheddatom' timestamp='1465292879' post='3066766']... I'd whack a big dollop of master compression on there first, to see how it all sounds when it's loud.
[/quote]

I did exactly this, through Reaper and EZMix, and it 'improved' the 'punch' quite well; all was lost when I rendered to MP3; I could no longer distinguish between the treated and raw tracks..! Mastering to the selected medium, and choice of final format will determine the final sound more than any tiny touches, or even the quite extreme 'wash' that I gave it (I was trying to bring up the 'snap' of the snare but couldn't, without isolation of the drum track...).
I think the panning will do enough; it's really not bad at all, especially, as you mention if it's not going to be listened to on monitors..!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='cheddatom' timestamp='1465294881' post='3066800']
what sample rate mp3 are you encoding Dad?...
[/quote]

My trial was 128, as I wanted a fairly lightweight file to post back to this topic. T'wasn't worth it, in the end; I didn't want to post a WAV, and 128 is usually good enough for Soundcloud, I find. Maybe I'll do another version, 'hiking' the bitrate, just to see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the best I could render in mp3 320, very highly compressed, just for fun...

[attachment=220955:untitled_2.mp3]

It's got a bit more 'air', maybe; a touch more assertive, 'in your face'..? It would sound better through a car radio than a hifi unit, I reckon.

Edited by Dad3353
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not bad dad! It does highlight the echo on the snare, mostly 200Hz ish (I guess) slapping back after every snare hit, which I really don't like! I'd just cut the low end out of that reverb (assuming it's not the sound of the room!). The vocals could take a bit more reverb or delay, but it's not essential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'd say is that the keys are not too forward in my headphones, the guitar certainly is, though.

Take the guitar rhythm work down a few notches. Why does the guitarist feel the need to double up on the bass part? Get him to play something more rhythmically interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...