Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

neepheid

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    11,750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

neepheid last won the day on December 22 2025

neepheid had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About neepheid

Personal Information

  • Location
    Aberdeen

Recent Profile Visitors

22,464 profile views

neepheid's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Great Content Rare
  • Basschat Hero Rare

Recent Badges

11.9k

Total Watts

  1. I have joined the club! I'm hoping that part of the reason I don't play at home much is the suitability of the stuff I have - the Markbass Mini CMD121P IV combo is neighbour annoyingly loud at like 1 on the master, has no aux in, no use for practising at all. Up until now, I have been using my backup head (TC Electronic BH250) and that's OK, but it's headphone only unless I trot out a cab too, and while it has advantages (like the built in tuner) and has aux in, it's just a PITA to set up, especially for a quick blast, so I tend not to bother. I've seen this thread with interest and watched a bunch of videos which didn't seem to be full of excrement which showed it in a favourable light, so I decided to go for it. Got it on a deal on Amazon (ordered 12th December, in case you were wondering if a confession was needed in the Gear Abstinence thread...), took a while but it finally arrived today. I'm very impressed! I went in with reasonable expectations - I know it's not going to pull up any trees, and it's going to inevitably be a bit on the boxy side of tone, but it isn't half bad for all that. Better in headphones than out loud, but not awful. Bluetooth is less laggy than I was expecting, which is good when you're following music/tab on a screen whilst playing - it's still a wee bit behind but a lot less than previous Bluetooth devices I have tried to use to make aux in be cable free. Haven't played with the USB audio interface part of it yet, but I've been using it for over 90 mins now with Bluetooth on, and the 11200mAh@5V power bank I have been using it with is still showing 4 out of 4 lights - which seems bonkers to me! It'll probably just switch off all of a sudden, but it's still working as I type! I may return with more thoughts at a later date, but I think this is an excellent piece of kit and I'm very glad to remove at least one excuse for not practicing as much as I should...
  2. Ha ha, a swing and a miss, it happens.
  3. Out of those I can do the following: Sunday April 19th 2026 (last choice because got a gig on the 17th, hence why I can't do the 18th) Saturday April 25th 2026 Sunday April 26th 2026 Saturday May 9th 2026 Sunday May 10th 2026 Had some close calls around these dates with band and personal stuff recently so it would be good to get it tied down soon.
  4. It subtly changes the sound, and gives people yet another thing to endlessly debate the virtues of on an electric bass
  5. I'm pretty sure even my privileged and well enough off self doesn't eat enough fruit.
  6. Most Gibsons issued in 2024 had a "120th Anniversary" inlay at the 12th fret... Not the anniversary of a manufacturer, but there is the 20th Anniversary Epiphone Jack Casady...
  7. Ahh, but showing you're keen and going for extra credit isn't the same thing as being given 10 songs to learn straight off the bat for an audition...
  8. Right, let's get @paul_5gate out of the way. The way I read it, I reckon the majority ruling is T2 failure, but still OK for T1. Everyone OK with this ruling?
  9. I'll be "that guy" - what are you wanting to achieve by changing the bridge?
  10. I think it's a free choice, and it's none of my business what any of you choose. I don't really feel like sharing my personal opinion on this, because someone will likely come along to tell me how wrong I am, as is always the case in threads like this.
  11. Thankfully well out of my price range, even their more "affordable" offerings.
  12. I used one of these inline things when I was testing/repairing my Epiphone Jack Casady - I had to take the stock transformer out of the equation to prove that it was faulty.
  13. Seems more complex according to this diagram:
  14. I think I was referring to the electrically clever nature of it. Obviously too clever for me to implement (I hear you, I think it's (functionally) daft too)
  15. Yes, I would imagine so. It's not in danger of turning into a singularity any time soon...
×
×
  • Create New...