Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Phil Starr

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    5,591
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Phil Starr last won the day on November 10 2025

Phil Starr had the most liked content!

Personal Information

  • Location
    Chard,Somerset

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Phil Starr's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Basschat Hero Rare
  • Great Content Rare

Recent Badges

4.6k

Total Watts

1

Community Answers

  1. I was talking about the difference between carrying RCF 310's and 8" cabs. The 310's are big enough that they can be a significant lift and carry and take up space in the car if you are also carrying a bass and bass ammplification. That may not have been very clear
  2. The simple answer is about biology rather than physics. As usual in science with a few provisos. The smallest change in sound you can hear is roughly 1db, you'll notice this when you turn the amp up or if you switch between two cabs but if a punter left to go to the bar and came back after you'd made a 1db adjustment to your bass they wouldn't notice. If someone asks you to turn up a tiny bit you'd probably go for 3db. It makes a small but noticeable change. Now the provisos, your 500W into 4ohm cab will probably be rated at 300W into 8ohms. You won't get double the power availability because the power supply won't perform at that power level. The difference in sound output at full power is roughly 2db but at anything under flat out the power will double and you'll get a 3db change when you swap speakers from 4 to 8. However (that word that means its getting complicated) if you are running flat out the amp and speaker will get hot, the hot components increase in resistance and the available power will drop. This power compression is significant and in the end will dwarf any changes to the impedance of the cab you are driving. Doubling your number of speakers will mean that at the same power the speakers will heat up less as the power is shared between them. Inside the amp a lower impedance increases the current and the heating. At this point it all depends upon what the designers have done about heat sinking components and it is all beyond your control. So the short answer is: technically it might sound a tiny bit louder, but you wouldn't really notice and the difference would disappear if you ran everything flat out, which probably isn't something you will do. Relax, don't worry, just play bass.
  3. I've offered to buy them back at the same price
  4. Hi Andy, it's very much horses for courses. I use my RCF 310's with my duo but we are pretty loud. Bass, guitar and two vocals with programmed drums all straight through the PA and pretty loud we regularly play for 50-100 people. You might need that much but you might not. The argument for these is that they would do everything you were likely to ever need including putting bass through and leaving your bass amp behind. The argument against is that you'd be carrying a lot of hardware you'd rarely need. I guess you are playing with a bodhran or something similar as your loudest percussion which wouldn't be too difficult to match with even a pair of decent 8" speakers as has been suggested. That's not a bad shout as a compromise between versatility and ease of transport. The RCF Evox would be good too and I quite like the sound they make. Some of the other stick on a sub systems can be a bit disco with slightly over eq'd responses though so make sure you have a listen before you buy.. The only way you'd find out if one was enough would be by trying it and being prepared to buy a second if that wasn't up to the job you wanted.
  5. I'm dying to come across to hear these John. I gigged in a small venue this Saturday with my band and my RCF ART745's were just way over the top and physically narrowed the stage. The volume limit was restricted by feedback so I was just carrying a lot of cabinet for no reason. My duo sound every bit as good with just the ART310's and I'm thinking a smaller rig for smaller venues with the band might be justified. We rehearse in a bigger venue than we usually gig so I've got the opportunity to try out a smaller system.
  6. I'm always slightly worried when somebody buys equipment I've reviewed so I'm really pleased the Flow 8 is working well for you. Mine is sitting on my desk doing it's thing so much better than my old Alesis without a hiccup despite being on 24/7. I've only used other peoples Alto 408's a couple of times at open mics but I'm really impressed with the sound for vocals /acoustic instruments which I find better than the Alto 12" cabs.
  7. Yeah I don't think using different frequencies on the crossovers is a good idea. you can easily end up with a gap in the frequency response which is audible and hard to get around. Far better to just use the sub's crossover. The response of subs is often far from flat but a 24db/8ve crossover is going to keep a lot of problems under control. I know I set a bad example in the past but that ws in the absence of any sort of crossover, if I'd had one I would have used it. By all means experiment with aux fed sus but I still think your best result will be to use the built in crossovers, it aids set up times too once you have the relative levels set between subs and tops.
  8. I think that by 'noise' we mean pink noise, electronically produced random noise filtered to mimic music content. The idea of hundreds of watts produced by 50 bass players all playing different things... No, wait,that is a Bass Bash 😁
  9. Absolutely, firms like Mesa, solidly grounded in engineering, are exemplary in terms of presenting data, especially if you dig deep into their manuals and technical documents. Long may it last. The problem is in many countries that regulation has become a dirty word, it's become quite a brave decision to be honest with your customers when your competitors are 'cheating'. There aren't many chief executives who want to genuinely risk being brave
  10. Only quoting this bit because it raises an interesting question which your post does go on to mention. Everything goes to pot once the marketers get hold of every bit of printed and broadcast material. It's the governments fault. To a large extent it's the voters fault and to a greater extent it's the non voters fault. Anyone who ever proudly says 'I don't vote, they are all the same' it's definitely their fault. Companies are over claiming figures massively and across the board, they routinely measure their amps output power then simply multiply the figure by four. Literally just that, times four, no science, no measurement just barefaced lie. To be fair some even admit it. In the small print you'll see "**calculated figure". Frequency responses are now given +/- 10db rather than the +/-3db used decades ago and sometimes even less honestly. The problem is that once one company does it everyone eventually has to. Who would buy a 500W PA speaker from RCF when they can get a 2000W one from Yamaha. And that's the thing; for years you could buy really cheap 'party speakers' from the likes of Maplin advertising 1,000W PMPO which we all knew weren't serious speakers, but people who wanted to party could buy something good value for money and claim they had a 2,000W system. Then firms like Alto and Samson started to use the same PMPO figures and ate into the market. "I know it's only an Alto but is sounds OK and it's 2,000W so it's got to be as good as a 500W Yamaha" In the end Yamaha and others cracked and started using the 'calculated power' fiction and everybody else had to fall into line or let their sales fall. I notice that even Wharfedale have cracked and FBT are quoting the silly 4x power figures and then giving the maximum output figures of their PA in real money. So why is this the governments fault? Because there are laws in this country, and the rest of Europe to prevent advertising lies, to protect the public but the laws aren't enforced. The penalties for dishonest advertising aren't particularly severe but all of the funding for public protection has been slashed by politicians of all the ruling parties in the name of cutting spending and goverment red tape. The refgulators have almost no power over the sectors they are reglating and everything gets a little more s**t. Literally in the case of the water companies and some of the hospitality venues. Meanwhile with the loss of interest in politics and membership the parties are all now dependent upon 'donations' from rich individuals, lobbyists and the companies they are supposed to be regulating for our benefit. We go on voting for parties that promise tax cuts and cuts to the nanny state so now all the major parties promise to do just that. (whether they do or not you can judge for yourselves, there's not a lot of advertising standards in politics any more,though they aren't all the same in how brazen or even plausible their lies are. We also seem to enjoy being lied to, you can work out an amplifier or a speakers power if you know a bit of simple physics and can be bothered to do the sums. I could name dozens of people on BassChat who do this routinely several of whom have already posted in this thread. The trouble is that people love to say they bought a 2,000W bass amp and that their PA is 10,000W just as much as they like to say they voted for the party that will fix the £16billion worth of potholes, cntinue the triple lock and promise to cut taxes and borrowing at the same time.
  11. I don't know why you would use 15" tops with 18" subs really if you are buying these new. You'll be crossing over well above the frequency where 15s give any potential advantage over 12's. I have a Passat estate I can take 15" tops plus two 15" subs, 10" monitors, my bass gear with leads, stands and several lights with careful packing but it is tight and it would be far quicker to pack into something a bit bigger. You can't see out of the back either. I rarely use the subs as there is not much the 15's can't do on their own but starting again with 12's might be better.
  12. Hi Pete as we say in the West Country "if that's where you want to go I wouldn't start from 'ere" The attractive hillock of top end with the Fane would have to be removed to successfully integrate a tweeter and its a lot of hillock and would make for a very complex crossover. Other 8's have a much smoother roll off like the Celestion Pulse in your 110T and you'd be far better looking at one of those.
  13. I just cross my legs and go for it
  14. Yeah next level in some cases. It's why I enjoy playing pop, there's often a load of work gone in by people who are anonymous session players but with huge musical knowledge. The best of them do what is right without needing to show off. I've looked at a lot of Abba but their songs do look challenging. I've only managed Does Your Mother Know to date.
  15. I'm a fascist when it comes to this. So many covers bands waste huge amounts of time at rehearsal by not pre-agreeing an arrangement. It's a bit like sending your bus driver out without deciding where to put the bus stops. I send out a spotify list with a version I think is OK, if people object I'll go with the majority feeling but if someone objects once we get to the rehearsal room it's too late, the rest of us have spent time learning the 'original' from the spotify list. You've let the band down, let yourself down, let your parents down basically it's up to the person who has done an alternate version who will have to adapt. Once we've got the basic song working we will always look at starts and endings and often make decisions about taking bits out or more often adding extra choruses and we may then come up with an own, arrangement. The guitarist and I live close to each other so we've usually met up by this stage to iron out issues. For instance theres a little decending scale in Maria played on bells that I do. I also try and reflect the piano part at the beginning of One Way or Another.
×
×
  • Create New...