mcnach

[quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1441542023' post='2859625'] All this "I bring two basses in case one breaks" and "I buy superior quality gear because it's more reliable" just seem like mealy-mouthed justifications for what is simply an indulgence, although so many here seem to be unwilling to admit that's what it is. If you want to play at being a big-time rock star, if you do it as an indulgence, if you simply have more fun that way, just bloody well say it instead of getting all upset when I don't believe that you bring two superior quality basses to the pub "in case one breaks". [/quote] ... ok, now I see why some people get a bit annoyed that sounds a bit too judgemental, to be honest. It is an indulgence for many. And nothing wrong about that. Personally, I don't take backup basses to our typical gigs: they're rather loose and I can easily replace a string. However, for "serious" gigs I have taken not only a spare bass but a spare amplifier. Last thing I want is to travel 200 miles to a gig that we get paid well for, and have to say "ooops, my bass doesn't work". It's rare... but I have had an amplifier go "puff" with sparks and smoke on me, and... this is the crucial part... if I have spares, and can transport them, and don't inconvenience anybody... why not bring them along? I also have spare contact lenses and spectacles in my car.

[quote name='timmo' timestamp='1441542931' post='2859635'] Why should they have to justify what bass they buy? You have already said that it was just a clickbait topic. [/quote] I don't think anybody is being forced to justify anything. You only owe that to yourself and nobody else. A couple of questions have been asked. Some find them pointless, some don't and respond. Not everybody has the same views... erm, what's surprising? What I don't get is the "this thread is pointless" comments (if it's pointless, what are you doing replying to it?) or feeling like you have to justify anything or that you've been attacked. You don't. You haven't.

[quote name='TimR' timestamp='1441540210' post='2859604'] Well, I'm with Milty. It's interesting to see what motivates people and what lies behind their choice of instrument. I never understand why some people see words on a page to have any malice. Non have been written. It's all in your heads guys. I just thought there were two reasons for choosing a particular bass. Seems I'm wrong so the thread has at least been interesting to me. Rampant consumerism? Hardly. We don't buy an expensive bass as soon as it's released and bin the old one. The supply chain and exchange of second hand gear is far more complex than that. As I wrote earlier, if you feel you have to defend yourself then maybe you should look at really why you bought the bass. So far only one person has admitted to being an out and out poser. [/quote] my thoughts exactly...

[quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1441491139' post='2859299'] Aside from the cost factor and the law of diminishing returns. I don't disagree, however. Most high-ticket basses are better. There is an interesting phenomenon that simply pricing something higher makes it's disproportionately more valuable, which harks the old question "Is a Fender really worth it?". [/quote] Yes, I have to have at least one or two Fenders at home. It keeps my Squiers on their toes, so they try harder. Then I can gig with the Squiers

[quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1441313907' post='2857922'] I find this "I sound great, therefore I play better" attitude quite hard to understand. I consider sounding great to be relative to the people you are playing with, not relative to other basses. When musicians are on the same wavelength with each other, they sound great. It wouldn't matter if you had the most expensive bass in the world or not, a great jam is a great jam. [/quote] reread the "I sound great, therefore I play better" as "I love the way this bass feels and sounds, therefore I find it more inspiring to play, so I am more in tune with it and as a result I seem to play better - or I enjoy playing it more" that's how I understand it, at least. There was nothing wrong with my OLPs, and I've been known to be a bit of a reverse snob, but when I got my Stingray it just felt right in a way that the OLPs didn't quite match.

[quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1441299278' post='2857753'] Looking purely at the facts, spending £2,000 on a guitar to play 15 £200 gigs throughout the year doesn't make business sense. [/quote] but it may make all the sense in pleasure terms... 15 gigs a year at £200 a pop is clearly not a business

[quote name='Grangur' timestamp='1441972058' post='2863375'] Question here for the wise: Is there any reason why I shouldn't use it as an expansion to the CM121? I know that due to the watts rating, of course I'd need to keep it turned down. [/quote] I used to have a Schroeder mini10R. It was roughly the size of the Retro One, but heavier, and rated to 300W. I used it quite a bit with my CMD121P combo, and it was a nice combination. I played quite a few small bar gigs like that, where its small footprint was ideal, and it mnoved a lot more air than you'd think. I don't see why those two would not work well together. You won't break anything, so try it

[quote name='Grangur' timestamp='1441971756' post='2863372'] As requested. The combo on the left is a CMD121. Both have their back panels parallel. Coke can is standard size. It's really light to carry. I'd say making one that has a docking port to take the amp would be a cool option; so the amp is protected and saves you carrying it as a separate item. [/quote] ha ha! the perfect photo. Now we need a review comparing the CMD121P combo to the One+LMIII. Tone, output, girth... pleeeease

[quote name='Roland Rock' timestamp='1441961025' post='2863223'] Can you put it beside a can of Coke for scale purposes please (not one of the crappy tiny ones you get on airplanes) I can only truly guage the size of something if it's beside a can of coke. [/quote] yes!

[quote name='Beer of the Bass' timestamp='1441965719' post='2863282'] Nice, and it'll look good on stage. It has a bit of a Charvel/Jackson vibe about it, but thankfully without the pointy headstock! [/quote] that's true!!!!!!!! but yeah, not a fan of pointy headstocks. I did own an Ibanez RG548 (SSH, floyd rose, pointy headstock) but it was natural ash so a bit more subdued and not so "80s"... that's as far as I'd go.

[quote name='LewisK1975' timestamp='1441962207' post='2863242'] NICE! Lovely as it is tho, with a Delano MM pickup between the reverse P and the Bridge, you'd seriously have something special there!! [/quote] I did toy with the idea of adding a second reverse P right below the other one... but my whole point was simplicity and the hybrid thing: still fat, still reminiscent of a Precision, but a little more definition.

[quote name='ianrendall' timestamp='1441959748' post='2863209'] Thanks for the replies chaps! Also, why so many holes? [/quote] They moved production to Switzerland for a little while...

[quote name='TrevorR' timestamp='1441953664' post='2863161'] That's really not my kinda bass. But as not my kinda basses go that's one really really lovely not my kinda bass!!! Hmmmm... Starting to get seriously tempted by this brand! [/quote]

[quote name='Grangur' timestamp='1441957047' post='2863184'] New Cab Day! [url="http://i963.photobucket.com/albums/ae112/richard108/Mobile%20Uploads/2015-09/IMAG0683_zpsmmqh5nie.jpg"]http://i963.photobuc...zpsmmqh5nie.jpg[/url] I'm really pleased with it. Met Alex and learned more about their thinking. Great guy. He'll do well. He is doing well. [/quote] it's tiny! (and I love the way it looks ) I want to hear these minibeast! Especially with that very same amplifier

[quote name='zawinul' timestamp='1441922415' post='2863084'] Yeah i think you are probably right!! Still unsure of whether to order an ACG which has pre-amps i like or a cheaper but equally well built Adrian bass! [/quote] can you buy the ACG preamps?

[quote name='spyder' timestamp='1441901112' post='2862822'] Can't wait to see your new Maruszczyk. The basschat Maruszczyk club is starting to expand. My Elwood is having new wood covered Haussel pickups installed next week so I will post my new baby soon. [/quote] it's this one: [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/269295-nbd-maruszczyk-jake-4-custom"]http://basschat.co.uk/topic/269295-nbd-maruszczyk-jake-4-custom[/url]

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1441894040' post='2862720'] Eh?? I thought it was green. [/quote] It's the Jake 'sunglasses' custom 4 [quote name='discreet' timestamp='1441894040' post='2862720'] Credit where it's due. I was thinking along broadly similar lines myself. Less is more! [/quote] Indeed. After years of adding preamps and extra switching combinations to everything... I am now appreciating the beauty of a simple instrument: one pickup, basic tone shaping, volume to mute when not playing.

[quote name='Naetharu' timestamp='1441892803' post='2862690'] Loving it! It looks great with the bold red and simple colour config. Congrats mate What specs did you go with for it? [/quote] I went for the standard Jake design with a number of variations: Passive electronics - volume/tone Ash body Maple neck/fingerboard, vintage tint glossy lacquer 3mm diameter side dots 43mm spacing at the nut and 21mm deep at 1st fret (wide and wide spacing, but not chunky in cross-section) Hipshot ultralite tuners ETS bridge (20mm spacing, top-loading) Delano PMVC 4 AL-H pickup The pickup is in reverse orientation and slightly closer to the bridge than normal. Essentially, the DG coil is about 5mm closer to the neck than the standard Precision DG, and the EA coil just below it. I was playing with pickup placements a while ago on an old OLP, and that was roughly one of the positions I liked a lot. It was fat, but a bit more defined than a Precision, yet it still share a lot with the Precision. If I moved it closer towards the bridge then it started getting too much into Stingray territory, even using P type pickups, so that looked like a good place for a "hybrid". I love the Precision, but I miss the extra definition I get on a Stingray. This is my attempt to get something that would sit in between. Oh, it also has my band's logo on the headstock

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1441892997' post='2862694'] I beg to differ, it looks totally fantastic. But now I want the same in vintage white with chrome hardware... Would you mind very much if I was a bit nosy and asked you to PM me a few details? Cost, waiting time, etc? Thanks and congratulations on a really cracking bass. If it plays and sounds as good as it looks then you've got a winner there. [/quote] Thank you! I'll PM you tonight. Put the kettle on.

[quote name='Sibob' timestamp='1441892548' post='2862683'] Wow, that is......red! Congrats Si [/quote] RED? crap! my monitor is playing up again... it's supposed to be blue!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[quote name='mal2404' timestamp='1441892187' post='2862679'] It's official Adrian, simple does not make bad looking basses!!! Love it man and I can't believe it's ready so quickly!!!!! How long did you have to wait? [/quote] I ordered it in early-mid July... so about 8-9 weeks? I wasn't expecting it yet!

[quote name='Naetharu' timestamp='1441891283' post='2862657'] Any chance of a picture of your one? Give how nice all of the Maruszczyk basses are I very much doubt its anything but awesome. [/quote] It's here: [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/269295-nbd-maruszczyk-jake-4-custom/"]http://basschat.co.uk/topic/269295-nbd-maruszczyk-jake-4-custom/[/url]

Much faster than the 10 weeks I expected... my new Jake is ready! I'll not have it with me until next week, but Adrian sent me a picture to keep me daydreaming It's a very simple design, and not a looker compared to other basses, admittedly. I did not go for looks on this one, but for simplicity and I specified all hardware, pickup placement, neck profile/finish, even the side dots... Can't wait!!! ([b]edit: it arrived at post #20[/b])

[quote name='Naetharu' timestamp='1441876688' post='2862460'] Hi folks, I just got an email from Adrian this morning to say my new Maruszczyk Elwood has been finished and is on its way to me. He sent me a nice pic too so I thought I would share it with you all. [/quote] wow, that is seriously sexy! I also got a similar email from Adrian this morning... but although I love mine, visually yours is in another league entirely Mine is pretty pedestrian looking, by design, and I don't regret it, yours is a work of art... congratulations!!! I'll post mine separately... but it'll look like the ugly duckling next to yours

And my new Maruszczyk Jake is finished!!! I've seen it and it's gooooorgeous It'll be posted on Monday. The last few days are the worst to wait...