Quatschmacher

Sounds like you’re already getting good and useable results from it.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/sep/06/brazilian-musician-sergio-mendes-dies-aged-83

Awesome, seems there’s a lot of later 70s Temptations I haven’t heard. Thanks for sharing. Just added a few albums into my list.

No one? @RigorMortens?

Have you played the V4? It’s as fast and accurate as that on the “accuracy” setting. Because it has to issue a MIDI note-on message, it has to absolutely know the pitch before sending so takes one wave cycle minimum. (Triggering synths via CV is faster as the gate trigger can be sent before the new pitch has been read (so functions exactly like the FI in “speed” mode where the previously-played note is used until the new pitch is detected).) In absolute terms, the latency when playing a low B is always going to be 33.333…ms minimum as that is how long it takes for one 30Hz waveform to be completed. There is work in progress to further improve the tracking reliability. Depending on the note quality of the input note, the detection circuit can take a few cycles before it has determined pitch. The work should get it so it will lock on within a single cycle most of the time. During the previous round of testing the new algorithm was really fast but caused some pedal lockups on occasion. Optimisation work has been done elsewhere to reduce processor load so that should no longer be an issue. Andras is doing further detailed work on training the algorithm via a neural net. This involves training the algorithm on real-world samples of pitch input so that it can know which pitch is being played. It will also help to work out what situations might cause mistriggers and help to compensate for those types of input. It’s pretty exciting stuff. Once machines become even more powerful, it may even be possible to do some kind of predictive analysis using only the rising portion of the waveform but I guess that’s some way off. I had suggested some kind of tailored, per-user learning, where the users trains their own pedal user their own instruments/playing style. Again, probably some way off being a reality as it would require a chunk of memory I guess.

More like dust bunnies.

Seems I may need to spell it out as my hint is too subtle: I’m triggering an actual DX7 using my bass! I’m sure you can work out the significance of my having posted this in this particular thread!

What’s going on here then? IMG_0052.mov IMG_0048.mov IMG_0044.mov

I just sold John my C4; all organised really quickly from initial contact last night to payment and collection this afternoon, with friendly communication both online and in person. I’d be happy to transact again. Many thanks and hope you enjoy the glorious synth tones.

Could someone who has a Mercury Flanger and access to the desktop editor please check something for me: If you load a phaser patch into the pedal and turn the “delay” knob on the pedal, does the “frequency” knob in the editor move? In the old editor the knob was labelled frequency/delay. Basically, I need to know whether it’s possible to control the phaser sweep’s centre frequency directly from the pedal; if so, I need to get one instead of my Lunar as that’s a far more useful feature to me than control over the LFO shape. Thanks.

You could perhaps run something in the C4’s loop and use it as a mixer to isolate what you need then sum to mono.

A sort of redo of the MKII but with envelope control. Sadly USA only though. https://www.chaseblisslegacy.com/billy-strings-wombtone?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0DkRrw735sXjKcOM3TTtwA9nqJrEZBWAn60_5zcDvGTgWnvXPFVSCMbrA_aem_fAFRAoTuFtJmNDy45crnKg