[quote name='Truckstop' timestamp='1456501631' post='2989730']
I like it because I can perv at basses I wouldn't normally look at.
I say we leave it as it is.
[/quote]
I agree.
The problem with doing it otherwise is that it becomes a lot of work for the mods. What would happen if you dropped your price across a board boundary (so the boards go "up to £500", and "£500 plus", but you;ve dropped your price from £550 to £475)?
[quote name='tom1946' timestamp='1456504452' post='2989798']
How do you tell? I don't think so? help anyone? it has 22 frets.
[/quote]
.The scale is twice the distance from the nut to the 12th fret. (The bridge saddles are adjustable, so we don't measure to them.)
Possibly. I need to improve my playing, my reading, etc., and a group to do it would be good. However, I am a rotten player and nowhere near either of you gentlemen, so I am a little unsure...
[quote name='JapanAxe' timestamp='1455282181' post='2977752']
I change my right-hand plucking position to adjust the timbre of the notes, but I had never thought about doing this on a string-by-string basis. ...
[/quote]
Me too.
That is [i]ridiculously[/i] cheap... it's worth more than that for the pups! And the hard case.
I'm surprised at the nut width. Mine's a treetrunk - one of the reasons it's under the bed feeling lonely.
More pics of the back of the body than the front. Hmm. Though I suppose it won't show the dents...
I don't know how easy it will be to clean sweat and other stage grot off it.
It's too gaudy for my taste. And so is the instrument.
If I have it right it's a keytar with a mike on it. There is a whammy-style mechanism in it so you can wobble it about. The mike ouput can be treated by the electronics. The ergonomics look OK.
Close to pointless IMO, because it can't be played with a bow (needs a DB-type bridge and FB, which in turn means a DB-ish angle between neck and body).