Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Dad3353

Member
  • Posts

    19,054
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

Everything posted by Dad3353

  1. I'm the opposite, regarding double-pedal drumming. Used tastefully (read 'sparingly...), it's very effective, but 'blast beats' do nothing for me, except maybe get me to turn it off. I've not a long list of drummers expert in this (naturally, as that's what I don't listen to..!), but there are top folks such as Weckl, or Bozio (there are many others...) that get my attention when they dabble in this Dark Art. I do have a double pedal on my kit; I use it maybe twice in a typical set, rather as a suspense-building crescendo (think timpani rolls...) than as a beat in itself. In fact, at my last job, I had a double pedal under my desk, and spent the 'working' day exercising, but basically as muscle and reflex builder rather than as a musical instrument. As with much else, 'Less Is More', I reckon.
  2. I don't know of many amps that will not accept a load impedance of less than 8 Ohm. They doubtless exist, but not common, I'd say. Many combos, on the other hand, have an 8 Ohm speaker in them, but a socket for connecting a second cab, usually 8 Ohm too, so the amp 'sees' 4 Ohm. Connecting this 6 Ohm cab in such a situation would bring the total 'seen' by the amp to less than the 4 Ohm minimum (3.2 Ohm, if it's really a 5.3 cab...). Some amps won't mind this, as speaker impedance is not a fixed value anyway (it depends on many factors in Real Life Conditions...), but would not be advisable for long-term reliable operation, I'd suggest. Hope this helps.
  3. He read somewhere that 'modeling' guitars were where it's at. They're definitely dummy pick-ups, though.
  4. I don't drive fast, and, for medical reasons, I'm not an 'adrenalin' bod; when driving long distances this is the sort of thing I'd be listening to ...
  5. Didn't he hear the door-bell..? ... ... (Sorry. )
  6. It looks to have three speakers, so I'd guess that these are each 16 Ohms, and wired in parallel, giving just over 5 Ohms, arithmetically. Any amp that can deliver to 4 Ohms would be fine with this, and it would put out more than the same amp under 8 Ohms. It's not so unusual; there used to be many cabs with other impedances than 4 or 8. I don't know of any amps that won't accept less than 8 Ohms. Maybe an old valve amp with only a 4 Ohm transformer, but even then such a small difference is very unlikely to do any harm. It's not really an issue, unless pairing it in parallel with another is to be envisaged.
  7. Conversely, I'd never heard of The Chameleons, Comsat Angels or House of Love until you brought them forward (assuming that that's not the same 'Les Caméléons' that we crossed paths with in a past touring life...)
  8. Bof. I can't say I've ever noticed the fellow (yes, I was there at the time...).
  9. 'S'what comes of being 'picky', though, isn't it..? It's fine when the choices and opportunities are there, but becomes a bit 'painted into a corner' when the wheels stop turning. If there's only a few, limited situations that float your boat, get the work in in practising and learning, and wait for the golden opportunity to knock on your door, or start hustling to make it happen. It's not the easy route, though, so be prepared for either lowering your expectations (although that doesn't sound likely, given your stance...), or a struggle to meet all criteria. Go for the recording and take it from there, and use the occasion to strike up new acquaintances, open up the 'networking'. I hope it all works out, and BC is always here for ranting, kudos, jokes and (sometimes stale...) advice. Other than that : welcome back.
  10. Here's the Spoiler with the Composers, for those struggling for the last couple of faces ...
  11. Aha..! Two more (Boy George and that Somerville fellow...)
  12. Assuming that that's him in the corner (well, nearly...), only one, I'm afraid. Not his name; just the band's name (or did I dream that..?). Any better luck with this lot ..?
  13. I can't think of any valid reason for objecting to the taking of photos, especially if you're showing an interest in buying it. Such a refusal, without acceptable motivation, would make me assume the worst; that there's maybe something fishy going on, and I'd back away. Next time you're passing that way, ask the bloke; he should say 'Yes', especially if it helps identification. Just my tuppence-worth...
  14. Old posts refreshed (but there's a lot of dross in there, so not as useful as it could have been. A pity, that. ...)
  15. For the buttons, no, but for strap-lock tone, the new Basschat strap-locks cannot be beaten, and are excellent value for not much money. A brilliant touch of glorious BC colour, at just the right spot to set off any combination of strap, tone-paint or natural finish. Forget the old, worn-out clichés of beer-bottle washers and get the new Basschat strap-lock for maximum tonal quality. Don't hesitate, order 'em today (plus a few spares for those basses you're sure to acquire shortly...). Don't get caught out, get the new Basschat strap-locks fitted right away..! Here's a handy link, to save you searching ... Basschat Strap-locks ... You know it makes sense.
  16. My interest in chart music has yet to be aroused, so there's little point in me even trying to guess any of whatever is on offer here. No cigar for me, then, but as I don't smoke... ...
  17. It doesn't necessarily follow that 'new' or 'inventive' ways of playing a bass are good, although they can, all, be tried at least. It may produce some kind of music when attacked with a blow-torch, or dragged across the stage by the jack lead, but I doubt that these extremes would catch on and become mainstream. I'm not suggesting that there's no merit whatever in 'slap'n'tickle' or whatever, but I certainly don't rate novelty over standard playing styles. I saw a TV spot once, quite a while back, whereby two reggae top knobs were being 'showcased'. The drummer (maybe Sly Dunbar..? I forget...) started tapping on the bass strings with his sticks. Very novel, and both had wide smiles, but it was an awful racket, for nothing. Original (at the time...), but of no further interest. Just sayin'.
  18. On A Bicycle Built For Two - Nat King Cole
  19. Paul..? Did you say Paul..? That Paul..? Ooo, I must have a bid; I've got almost all of his records..!
  20. The Marriage of Figaro - Mozart (It's a newspaper thing...)
  21. It's definitely bettah. (The mix, I mean; what else..?)
×
×
  • Create New...