I'd go much further than that, in suggesting that any 'luxury' items are at the expense of some poor sod in the world. It's my view that, once above a reasonable level (discuss 'reasonable'...), the 'wealth' accumulated comes from somewhere, and would be better spread out to those with less. This applies to holiday homes, second yachts, hunting lodges, eye-wateringly expensive motor cycles and cars and uber-expensive basses (list non-exhaustive...). An unpopular view, I know, and I've my share of hypocrisy in putting it forward, but until there's a better distribution world-wide, I'm rather Puritan where Luxury is concerned. I don't subscribe to the 'trickle-down' theories, either. Just sayin'.