Dad3353

What explanation have you had from Fedex, and what counter-measures are they putting in place to prevent this happening again to someone else..? I'm presuming that the shipping cost has, of course, been reimbursed..?

One day I will understand, but that day is not today.

Personally, I would recommend having some air flow, such as a door or window open or ajar, keeping the heating to a minimum and wearing a jumper and/or dressing gown to keep reasonably warm. I've just measured the room temperature here; it's 18°. Later on in the year it'll drop to about 14°. When, outside, we start to get frosts, I may, of an evening, light the wood-burner for a while; in general, the stone cottage remains at about 12-14°, even in the totally unheated rooms. My 'den/workshop', for instance, has no heating; many of my guitars are stored there, and all my model-building equipment and wood etc. Temperatures of the sort are no problem for stuff, as longer as there's ventilation. It's better to have an unheated room than to use a heater for a while, then turn it off. If the space cannot be kept at a stable temperature, better for it to be cool/cold to avoid condensation. Wrapping up warm yourself when in such an environment is always the first step, before considering short-term heating. If a heater is used, a radiant panel heater, which heats only the surface, not the air, is a better bet. One feels the warmth, as from sunlight, but the room itself is not heated. I have one such panel suspended over my armchair, in which I pass much of my waking day, and turn it on maybe a dozen times a year; it consumes 360 W, and I feel warm enough under it. Amazon : Infrared Radiant Heat Panel ...

All the more reason to not use heating; very little of our cottage is heated, and even then, very little. The house is completely damp-free, however, being very well ventilated, with little or no real insulation, double-glazing etc. The doors are open much of the time, for most of the year. None of our instruments, amps or cabs suffer from condensation. So...... Don't over-heat (there's an economy to be had, there...) and have the doors and windows open often. Ventilation is the key, as long as there's no other ingress of water (from the ground wicking upwards...) or from above (leaking downwards...).

I don't agree. Cold and dry will work, as long as there are no rapid temperature swings. There are hundreds of dry, unheated cellars and garages, for example, but they must have some air circulation.

The only cure for humidity in buildings that are otherwise water-tight is ventilation. Finding a way of getting air to circulate is the solution. Hope this helps.

There's Shirley a tribute band that could stand in..? Who would notice..?

Is there no dep singer available..? How hard can it be with an autocue..?

Maybe contact all the various Bay City Rollers tribute groups; they may have it offered to them (if they've not got such a kit already...)..?

A Tin of Sardines..?

Here is my contribution to the September 2024 Basschat Composition Challenge, illustrated with a picture chosen by Jean-Luc Pickguard. I was waiting in the car, listening to a classical music station, when I heard a piece that brought with it visions of this picture. It's heavily inspired by the Beethoven concerto (Opus 19...) I heard, but using a maximum of elements relating to either Up or Down. The instruments are Philharmonik, with drums by Superior Drummer 3. All in Reaper, of course, with only my usual NY Glue Cockos compressors and a spot of Ozone 8 on the Master track. Thanks for listening, if you already have; if you're about to, enjoy.

Being some four decades their senior, it might appear to be a bit cheeky. But that's my deaf side, just like the other, so I'd reply 'Nearly three o'clock; time for another 'comfort break'.

Ponce. ...

Anything Trump-related has its place in the 'Bad Jokes' section.

Do drugs make you a what..? Whatever, man; leave that sh** for serious talk over a spliff, not here where some of us are trying to concentrate. Now then; what was I saying..? Ah yes. The question of... What question..? No, man, it all comes down to the question of whether drugs make someone play better, presumably referring to playing a sport or game, a complex one that requires us to consider various factors. Performance enhancement in sports is a topic surrounded by ethical debates and regulations, and the term "better" is subjective and can refer to different aspects of performance. Firstly, let's differentiate between types of drugs: 1. Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs): These are substances that are specifically designed to improve athletic performance. They can include anabolic steroids, human growth hormone, erythropoietin (EPO), and various other stimulants. While some PEDs might provide a temporary or artificial boost in certain physical aspects like strength or endurance, they come with significant health risks and are typically banned in professional sports. The use of PEDs can lead to unfair advantages, which is why they are often vilified and regulated. 2. Recreational or cognitive-enhancing drugs: These might include substances like marijuana, alcohol, or certain prescription medications used off-label for performance enhancement. The effects of these drugs on performance can be varied and unpredictable. Some may claim to improve focus or reduce anxiety, but they can also impair coordination, judgment, and decision-making. Now, let's consider the factors that might influence the relationship between drugs and performance: - Physical effects: Some drugs may increase physical capabilities such as strength or endurance, but they often come with risks such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, and potential for injury due to overexertion. - Psychological effects: Drugs can alter a person's mental state, which might affect their performance in a game or sport. For instance, they might reduce anxiety or pain perception, leading to increased risk-taking or playing through an injury. - Legal and ethical considerations: The use of banned substances can result in disqualification, suspension, or even a lifetime ban from competitive sports, which can significantly harm an athlete's career. - Long-term health: The long-term use of certain drugs can lead to severe health issues, including organ damage, addiction, and mental health problems. - Consistency and skill development: Athletes and players generally achieve peak performance through consistent training, good nutrition, and rest. Reliance on drugs might overshadow the importance of these fundamental elements. In conclusion, while certain substances might offer temporary or specific performance benefits, they often come with substantial risks to health and career. Moreover, the concept of playing "better" extends beyond just the physical aspect; it includes fair play, adherence to rules, and the holistic development of skills and strategy. Therefore, it's not as straightforward as saying drugs universally make someone play better. In most cases, especially in professional settings, the use of drugs is discouraged and often illegal, as it undermines the integrity of the sport and can lead to negative health outcomes. The safest and most sustainable way to improve performance is through dedicated training, proper nutrition, and rest. ... or something.

I got mine, but couldn't find my glasses to read it.

Well, I tried the experiment, plugging my Verithin into the Fender Bassman Export 50 into the HH folded horn 2x15. Sitting close by, with the volume of the amp at 9 o'clock, I can play, but only have to lean forward to get controllable feedback, mostly from the 'A' anywhere on the neck. I had plugged in through my Boss Fender Deluxe pedal, which has level and gain controls. Setting the level to match dry/wet, once I start upping the gain, it becomes pretty much uncontrollable. The 'A's, obviously, but just about everywhere on the neck sets off deep, unmusical feedback. I couldn't get any gain setting which brought overdrive of any kind, as it would start howling and honking first. I couldn't play even a basic riff with that racket going on. I also have a germanium twin Big Muff, but a didn't dare to plug into that, as it has gain and distortion in spades, even with my guitars, so... This is not a comparison with the Casady bass, of course, but I can now state that which I hitherto didn't know : my semi-acoustic bass doesn't take well, at all, to 'drive'. I don't know if this helps, but at least I've learned something today.

OK, thanks for that; I understand better what the problem is. Jack Casady is at the top of my favourite bass players, and, one day, I'll be able to afford his signature Epiphone. It has a rather unique pick-up set-up, with an impedance-changer for getting different tones with different amps and consoles. I would guess that the impedance of the bass is not working well with the impedance of the pedal. Does this effect change when rotating the impedance control, or is it at every setting..? My 'go-to' bass is a Hofner Verithin, as acoustic an electric bass as it's possible to find, and it is very delicate when it comes to feedback. Personally, I like this, as I can approach the cab (Fender Bassman valve amp into Fender Bassman 2x15...) and 'play' the resulting tones. It's true that I never use pedals, so I've never used an OD signal; I would imagine that, being hollow, it would howl like a banshee at the slightest provocation. We live isolated in the countryside, so I'll try it out to see what happens, though. If you open a window, you might be able to hear it from where you are..! I'll report back...

Any chance of a description of the issue..?

When the nurse stops wheeling you onto the stage.

You don't state which model of amp, but the spec for all of them gives minimum speaker impedance as 4 Ohm, so two 8 Ohm cabs in parallel would be OK. If either cab has 'daisy-chain' sockets, they simplify cabling; otherwise you will need an Y-speakon cable or a 'splitter' box to be able to connect it all together. There would be no problem for the amp, connecting both cabs in parallel at the same time.