[quote name='Jimmyfingers' timestamp='1392853472' post='2373656']
Why is that when people go on about older guitars sounding better they are only ever talking about Fenders?
Back in the 80's you'd get people crowing on about 62 Precision or whatever, and I suppose they were pretty much the only brand that could have much of a vintage being the first production basses. So somehow a 20 year old Fender sounded better than a new one.
But now, you can get Warwick's or Status that are 20+ years of, and yet I've never heard anybody making claims for them sounding better.
Weird.
My first post, and I'm chuffed because I've just bought a 9 year old Warwick. My first bass since stopping playing about 10 years ago.
[/quote]
Interesting that you chose Warwick as an example, as I think there are [i]many[/i] people who feel the older ones sound and feel better. I don't know about Status, don't think the way they have been built has changed much at all.
I think in general it is not just about sound but about playability, aesthetics and the general vintage vibe, the latter being the only one a brand new 'custom built to your spec's' bass wont have. But, when you consider the costs of a 50's Precision or early 60's Jazz, you are paying an awful lot more than what most luthiers would charge for that vibe. Personally, I wouldn't even consider it. If you fancy a worn looking bass, play a new one for 30 years. If your impatient, get a Roadworn