Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Kev

Moderator
  • Posts

    10,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Kev

  1. £18.50 on the door, £0.95 saving and not funding AXS greed. Works for me.
  2. Is there a way of actually buying a ticket for £16? It links to AXS on the site and comes to £19.45 with fees, which I absolutely resent paying. Can you pay on the door?
  3. Loving the new content, along with the website it really marks a big jump forward in online presence for sure. Nice one!
  4. Kev

    Neural Quad Cortex

    Ah okay fair enough, QC it is then! Its a different world, but once you learn how to use it i'm sure you'll find itll do everything you want, and tons of stuff you didn't think you'd need. I've owned since launch, replaced quite a hefty pedalboard, and no regrets at all.
  5. Kev

    Neural Quad Cortex

    I guess I'd open with, what is leading you towards to Quad Cortex, given your preference for what sounds like a very straightforward setup? Gut response is to go Nano, as it doesn't sound like you'll use anything but captures and IRs, but just curious.
  6. Kev

    Neural Quad Cortex

    The new updated has an OC-2 and Meatbox model, nice for bass to get some attention. No experience with a Meatbox, but the OC-2 model is bloody good , compares very, very well with the original '82 I have on the board!
  7. Its the position of the bridge that gives me the most anxiety...
  8. What is wrong with people! 😅 As above, this bass was a good deal for US players, anywhere else the cost of shipping etc takes it way above its worth compared to others in the range.
  9. Anything well built and. crucially, well set up will work, preferably with hum buckers. Getting a "good" B is 99% about making sure the neck and bridge are set up optimally. String gauge is preference, scale length is a huge 2nd to setup. I currently use a StingRay and Alpher bass in B. I left 5's behind back in 2019 in favour of drop tuned 4's, never looked back. Realised I never liked using a G string and felt much more comfortable on a narrower neck, so made total sense.
  10. Whilst still not being the sound you're looking for, it was still a big difference right? As those pickups and preamp should have transformed the sound, like taking a blanket off your amp. The far east Barts are not good IMO but swapping them out usually makes a good budget bass great.
  11. Stunning neck! 😍 I do find it odd that with Music Man the necks generally seem to be complete luck of the draw. You get the odd spec that vaguely says "figured maple neck" and they can be anything from a plain old bit of maple to the deepest flame. My PDN has a gorgeous deep roasted birdseye maple neck, whereas others i've seen from the same run are pale and the most ordinary grain imaginable.
  12. Sound clip with all four on in series, solo'd Oct 2 please.
  13. He needs to actually become a better drummer and learn to be able to play to the gig. Finding solutions to bring his volume down is nonsense, he just needs to accept his performances are bringing the band down.
  14. DM me the thread links @patrikmarky and I'll sort it 👍
  15. Just to check the obvious, are you getting this with multiple "E" strings you've tried?
  16. Note how they don't claim innovation though! 😅
  17. Phew. After all that, I'd let Innovation at least have the rest of the afternoon off.
  18. There once was a bassist named Hugh, Whose excitement was truly untrue. He waited all day, For Fender to say, "We've got nothing new, just for you." I suppose the 15th actually means sometime this evening?
  19. "Innovation never rests" Its bold if its just colours and a new name for the same pickup. Difference with Ernie Ball and Rickenbacker is they don't do the same thing. The Stingray Special was the first time they reinvented the wheel since the 3EQ model came out. Sure they have the Classic Series and the replacement Retro series and a couple of artist models, but they don't seem to drag their fanbase to anywhere near the same degree. Same with Ric. Nothing like the same marketing philosophies.
  20. Because I imagine Spector was the only artist deal on the table good enough! But I agree, what on earth is the point. I'd like to think if I "made it" I wouldn't just go with a brand for the money.
  21. Which, to be fair, is absolutely fine and they're still doing extremely well I'm sure. I hate the milking the fan base stuff with release after release, but ultimately that's down to players falling for it. But just don't claim to be innovators in your marketing 🙃
  22. Metal is rather broad! Not a tiny % by any measure. Point is, Fender don't dominate like they did 30 years ago, there is a LOT of choice out there now and their lack of innovation has caused many to seek choices elsewhere. Sure the traditional stuff has a place, but not every place 👍🏻
  23. Watch Fender launch a multiscale headless jazz bass with an asymmetric neck and humbuckers next week now...
  24. But it's the very small % bit I'm also disagreeing with. What % of modern Metal music, lets say the last couple of decades, would you say was recorded with Fender basses, for example? Don't get me wrong, Fender's impact and dominance in the 20th century can't be argued with, but I don't think its as B&W as it used to be, not anymore.
×
×
  • Create New...