[quote name='TomRichards' timestamp='1343601143' post='1752674']
I don't lump all players in this category, as the majority are good citizens. I have experienced, of late, that there is a rising lot that are starting this trend.
There is a difference in endorsement levels, but the statement that we in the industry look the other way for the big guys is actually the opposite.
Yes, I did a little rant here, but when I was active as a player in the 70's thru the 90's most of us were very respectful of our endorsers, and endorsements were very hard to come by. This recent crew has just been more blatant then I've ever seen.
If your deal is exclusive, and I give you several basses and spend oodles of time working on them to get them to your liking, and I also provide you with tour support, you better be using my stuff.
Ok, I'll chime out now. Not a problem. Just a warning, especially if you are seeking out endorsements. And there really is an understanding among all the makers.
tom
[/quote]
No need to back out Tom, this is a very interesting read. I agree completely that if the terms of the endorsement state 'exclusive' then I would be kicking up a fuss (and possibly making an example of one or two offenders, terminate contract and reclaim endorsement).
Out of interest is it more common to endorse a band or artist? For example if a bassist plays in two different bands, would they usually be expected to play your gear in both?