Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

fretmeister

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    10,721
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by fretmeister

  1. 1 hour ago, martthebass said:

    I’ve always used a heavier gauge set on my shorties than the longies. Don’t know where I got the advice from; all mine are 50-105. I find I can easily pull the G off the fretboard on my G&L if I don’t do this…..crack handed, that’s me.

     

    Me too. I'm a 40-100 on a long scale, but 45-105 at least on a shortie.

    • Like 1
  2. Wampler pedals.

     

    Once upon a time they put out a book about effects. The book contained cut & pasted copy from a much smaller pedal maker to which Wampler had no involvement. They didn't even give credit to the original author, let alone pay them any money. No hint was given that the prose didn't belong to Wampler. The original prose was very specific to the original author.

     

    Other pedal makers such as the genuine legend Analogue Mike from Analogman quoted some of the original work and gave proper credit.

     

    Wampler can f*ck off into the sea.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. That’s an older shape.

    The designated Masterpiece aging was introduced relatively recently. I think there was some cross over of the old shape still being available and the Masterpiece but I don’t know the dates. I had an old shape in the heavy aged and it does look similar.
     

    Contact Gregor Fris via the Sandberg Facebook. You’ll get a quicker response.

     

    The Masterpiece includes vibration treatment and is a real step up in cost.

  4. My Superlight Lionel is passive and it sounds like a proper vintage precision.

     

    I think Thomann have over done it a bit in their chat.

     

    Do the Superlights sound different - Yes. They tend to have a snappier faster responding sound with a little less low end.... with all other things / setting remaining constant.

     

    Do the Superlights actually need active circuits to "overcome" the perceived lack of low end? - No. The bass and / or low mid controls on any bass amp can add or subtract far more low end than any choice of wood could ever do. My SL TT4 (Original Cedar wood) does have EMGS and the EQ in it. I use the Treble control a lot, and I use the bass control to reduce the lows in boomy rooms. I don't boost it on the bass. I do boost the lows on my amp - but only a little more than any other J type bass. On my Lionel (paulownia) I cut the lows at 65hz.

     

    Do I suspect that the Thomann people have plugged an alder body bass into an amp and then set up the amp and then plugged in a SL and left the settings the same? - Yes. And that's dumb. Every instrument needs something different. Strings make a vast difference too.

     

    Do all active pickups sound modern? - No. The original EMG J set is designed to sound like 1960s J pickups but without the hum. This is why they are the choice J pickups for Bobby Vega and Guy Pratt. This is one of the reasons I really like them. With steel rounds I can do Marcus Miller with it. With La Bella Flats and a bit of foam - it's Aston Barrett. It's all about the strings and the EQ on the amp.

     

    Does the "lack" of low end have any disadvantages? - Very subjective I think, so my view is very personal. To me, it's a bit like having an HPF built into the bass. I have 2 shorties and on the odd occasion when they are strung with the same strings I find I have to do less work on the Lionel to tame any boom. So overall I find it useful.

     

    I recognise the difficulty though - it's a lot of money to bang down to risk not liking something. I got my SL TT4 from Bass Direct and I swapped the pickups within about 3 months. It's stayed the same ever since other than having a ramp made for it. On the back of that I was happy to order a SL Lionel.

     

     

    Mike - if you are ever up near Northants you are welcome to pop in and try them out. 

     

     

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  5. 35 minutes ago, Boodang said:

    I came across the Galli strings as I was looking for something that not necessarily sounded like a DB but felt like my DB strings. I use synthetic core strings on my DBs and there’s a fair choice available but for BG it was all steel core, so I didn’t hold up much hope. Until I found the Synthesis strings. I believe, and don’t quote me, they are the only nylon core BG strings on the market. So the best way I can describe the feel is ‘buttery’, very much like my DB. I got mine from Bass Direct, they’re not the cheapest strings but like most flats it’s not like I’m going to change them very often. 
    Word of warning… the strings seem very robust when on the bass and under tension (they’ve stood up to live use, even when a guest tried to slap with them!) but they are v delicate out the packet and while you’re putting them on. They do warn you about this but be careful. 

     

    What's the tension like on the Galli Synthesis? I like Ti Flats and EB 40-95. Not a fan of anything higher tension than the EBs.

  6. 1 hour ago, Woodinblack said:

     

    ok! thought I must have missed something, so sorry for that.

     

     

    Indeed - it would have to be 18.47mm.. or close to 18.5mm

    So if you had a EHB or one of the later SRs you could probably make that adjustment on the same bridge!


    No apologies needed. Theres a very good chance I didn’t explain myself very well! 

  7. 28 minutes ago, Obrienp said:

    At the risk of keeping this hare running: in that case, I wish Ibanez had put a bridge with narrower spacing on the 5 string Mezzo. That way we could have had the benefit of the shorter scale without the extra neck width.


    I agree. Even just a little to 17.5mm to match a Stingray would have been very nice. 44.5mm. It would have been great as well.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...