cheddatom

It is 2 years old though, I think, and I must have done 30 odd gigs with it before the band stopped, and the new bassist uses it every week at least. It should still be going strong, but I bet the switches are soldered straight onto the board. I shall see anyway. It's still amazing value for money.

I have had that problem with the footswitches on the B2.1U though. I don't use it much now I don't play bass in a band, but my bassist uses it and it's driving him mental! I've taken it home with a view to repairing it, so i'll post how I get on.

I don't know which schecter I have, it seems different to the one you mentioned. Mine has 3 band EQ and is neck through etc. Anyway, if mine is the one you want you're welcome to try it out sometime. Stoke's not so far. EDIT: It looks like mine is the "studio 6" which is the next one up I think so maybe no much use in trying it out.

Yeh and with the zoom there is the potential for her to get into recording on the computer via the USB and free cubase that comes with it.

Heh - she can borrow an amp for gigging, that's what every other 15 year old bassist does.

I have a schecter, I got it from the states from Ebay and i LOVE it. I also bought a brice 6 string from Ebay that's very nice.

A multi effects pedal to listen to through some half-decent headphones would be much more fun than a new amp!!

That IS a cool sound. I think a lot of that is down to the distortion on it though. I think he uses two dunlop wahs together? I can get similar tones out of my B2.1U, AND from my wah probe. I'm pretty sure he has some clean blended as well.

The loops can be run in series actually.

[quote name='bobbass4k' post='327591' date='Nov 12 2008, 01:53 PM']Have to disagree with you there, they're good for guitar, but i've only ever found the "dark and deep" usable for bass, the wahs were designed for guitar and they cut out the lows completely, i've A/B'ed them all against my crybaby and to me the crybaby sounds better, but that could just be me[/quote] Good point, I blend a clean signal with all of my effects pedals so I don't get that effect.

I like my zvex wah probe - it sounds great with a bit of distortion. There are some great wahs on the Digitech XP-100 as well. This probably isn't that helpful. I've never tried a conventional wah as these have been so good!

The display does let it down. I think they have a better display in the bigger models though.

I don't think a subscription is the way to go. I think perhaps the Donations link could be more prominent. I didn't realise it was there for my first few months. I've made a couple of contributions, and i'm sure others have as well, but then there are people who can't afford/don't want to pay, and I wouldn't want to lose them. It's not as though BC is in financial trouble is it? RE Social networking stuff - don't we have that in our personal profiles? The Wiki could be used more. I think some of it is down to not knowing how to use it. I have on a couple of occasions made long posts here or on other forums which I would have liked to put into the Wiki here, as well as other people's posts, but I don't know how! I did try once - can't remember what went wrong but something deffinitely did.

I've not tried this with bass, but it works well with guitar.......... Play in a silent room, listening through headphones, and record the acoustic sound of your electric bass with a condensor mic. It's a nice option to have when mixing IMHO. Has anyone tried this on bass?

I don't think Behringer do a blending pedal. The Boss LS-2 has a buffer in it, and some people feel that this "sucks tone" or is noisy. I have one and it's fine. I hadn't hear of the Radial pedal, just had a quick look on google and it seems to do what you're after. It doesn't give you the 2nd loop that the LS-2 has. It also has a buffer. Whether or not it's a better buffer than the LS-2 I wouldn't know. I use my LS-2 for blending clean, compressed signal with distorted signal, which you obviously couldn't do with the Radial pedal.

MArchall Jackhammer is a great pedal! It's good to see it get a mention. The EQ options make it really good for bass.

If you're happy with the 708 but want better quality, try a B2.1U!

I think the interface on the 708 is better than on the B2.1U so bear that in mind for the future! I might actually get a couple while I still can - I can always re-house it if I ever start gigging again.

Where's your night shot? I highly recommend you get a psu with daisy chaning and plenty of current output!!

I used the 707 one for years. The footwitches went dodgy so I added metal ones. It looked pretty f*cked but worked really well for years. As soon as the metal B2.1U came out I got one!

Sounds cool. Do you not miss a wah? I couldn't live without a wah pedal. Maybe you should try an XP-100? I'd lend mine to you if you were closer.

Why not? What wah is it Kev? And what's that DOD-alike OD? Get a whammy for your octave, it'll be more fun.

It is nice to be able to name patches, but even with my appalling memory, I manage with the B2.1U. I don't think i've ever used a wah that I liked on a multi-effects. I've not tried enough to make a sweeping statement, but suffice to say, using a standalone wah might be more pleasing to your ear! For OD, Chorus, Octave, Fuzz, and Ring Mod, I reckon the B2.1U has it covered, although some of the overdrive and fuzz models aren't great. If your patches on the 708 sound muddy, why not try to EQ them until they're right? If it ain't broke.......