cheddatom

[quote name='niceguyhomer' post='168563' date='Apr 2 2008, 05:03 PM']Here ya go [/quote] I knew you were talking about that and that's why I asked. I specifically said They have great songs, fantastic ability, fiendish riffs, and very cool tone. I listen to a lot of the hendrix experience, and I was expressing my opinion in a reasoned manner. It genuinley annoys me when I can hear a great band with a crap sound/sound engineer as this is what I aspire to be, and this is where IMHO my talent lies. I was not "bashing" Hendrix and/or the Jimi Hendrix Experience. I'm sure the wink at the end of your post is supposed to signify that i'm not to take it too seriously, which I really am not, but reading this post back, it does come accross very confrontational/defensive. Sorry about that! I would take longer on it but i'm off home now

[quote name='bilbo230763' post='168552' date='Apr 2 2008, 04:47 PM']I think a bit of genre bashing is no more sinister than banter.[/quote] Was that to me bilbo? Sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound serious, I was trying to "explain" to homer that no-one was trying to ram their opinion down his throat, and that no-one had "bashed" any of the artists he mentioned, nor had they bashed old people. Anyway, sorry, it wasn't worded very well (as usual). Has anyone else seen Evlis recently?

Homer - I don't think anyone was being ageist or even mentioned the fact that you're really old ( ) Who the hell rubbished Hendrix? or The Beatles? Anyway, yeh, it's weird that you started a thread about finding something new and fun and people decided that it was necessary to use it to voice their musical opinions. If you read back, I think there's only one person with something negative to say about Elvis.

[quote name='Cantdosleepy' post='168532' date='Apr 2 2008, 04:25 PM']Glad you pinpointed the moment the Manics went a big wrong.[/quote] IMHO The Manics have always been up and down. The Holy Bible is on of the best albums ever created, and that means I listen more to their other stuff than I normally would. They have certainly created a lot of crap both with and without Richie.

[quote name='Richie Edwards']20ft. high on Blackpool promenade Fake royalty second hand sequin facade Limited face paint and dyed black quiff Overweight and out of date[/quote] I'm dissapointed that my Evlis' corpse kicking up a funk joke isn't doing it for anyone. I honestly thought that might get me into the famous quotes thread. F*ck you bass chat!

[quote name='Rayman' post='168412' date='Apr 2 2008, 01:04 PM']There's absolutely [i]nothing[/i] wrong with Elvis Presley, what's wrong with him?[/quote] Well, he is a bit rotten! I suppose bassists will appreciate that these days he can really kick out a funk.

I can't see the point in buying an amp that colours your tone that much. I have pedals to colour my sound, and amps to amplify it.

IMHO If you're recording live drums, and you're a rehearsed band, there is no need for a click track at all.

Bob the Blender? EDIT: That wasn't very helpful. I mean a DHA Bob the Blender has all of the features you need (I think). You can talk to Dave Hall on this message board, or go on his website for info.

[quote name='alexclaber' post='167681' date='Apr 1 2008, 02:57 PM']Actually, I can. I'm special like that. Alex[/quote] Pics to prove it.

[quote name='bass_ferret' post='167609' date='Apr 1 2008, 01:36 PM']Ah - so thats why Cream were such a crap band, and the Jimi Hendrix Experience. They were all 3 piece bands that did not have a bass player chording on a C string.[/quote] No need to be flippant. Jimi Hendrix Experience IMHO sound crap. They have great songs, fantastic ability, fiendish riffs, and very cool tone, but the overall sound is thin. If they were around today, i'm sure Jimi would be begging me to come and sort out the sound. ( ) Anyway, bass distortion and harmonies would have helped this, not extra strings. I occasionally play a 2nd guitar part in some more chilled out sections of music, or where the bottom end isn't required. God knows why people are talking about retaining the low end on a high C string. It's a high string!

I have two six strings and a 4 string acoustic. I take the 4 string to acoustic nights and such, but when I play it I really miss the low B. I use the High C to play chords, and to play guitar parts in the contect of a 3 piece band. I think that it works quite well. My High C certainly doesn't sound like a cheap imitation guitar, but I have a slightly unusual set-up. I don't NEED any more than my E and A strings to play "bass lines". I sold my 4 string because I can play the 6 string just as easily, and it provides me with flexibility. RE: Alex - You can't play 5 string chords on a 4 string bass!

I use different techniques to do the same thing. I'd love to try that though, I might try and modify my backup bass.

Do you have two outputs on your bass to do this? That's cool!

I really, REALLY hate dream theatre. So so boring. This kind of music is basically there because musicians like to show off, and other musicians like to watch musicians show off. If musicians didn't buy music, dream theatre would be flat broke. Someone mentioned the Mars Volta, who I have seen with Juan Alderete who was pretty astounding. I thought he had left the band now though?

We always find out exactly how long we're allowed on stage, and then practice our set so that it's comfortably within that time scale every time we play it. This doesn't stop people cutting us short though. I wish more gig-organisers would be strict about this so that the bands who are actually wasting the time get cut short, rather than the bands who are actually punctual.

[quote name='The Funk' post='161546' date='Mar 21 2008, 07:23 PM']We'd probably give them away for nothing - although a S.A.E. would be appreciated! I'll keep you posted.[/quote] Astounding pun!! Well done. Please let me/us all know if you sort out a disc and i'll be happy to pay.

[quote name='Higgie' post='160797' date='Mar 20 2008, 01:37 PM']Massively cheap.... Just kidding [/quote] You wrotter! I might sound massively cheap though, it's only my opinion.

Cheap stuff doesn't have to sound cheap. It depends what you do with it. I gig with 20 odd cheap pedals and I don't sound cheap, I sound f*ckin' massive! (IMHO)

Heh, I haven't seen that one actually. I have the same model but in blue. If you put a guitar through it and make the pre-amps distort it gets pretty nasty in a way that I like.

[quote name='aryustailm' post='156858' date='Mar 13 2008, 05:12 PM']My point is, it should never be subconcious. You should actively know what you are playing, and not just 'hope' for music to happen.[/quote] I suppose it depends what you're doing. If you're improvising a solo infront of an audience then obviously you'll need to know what you're doing incase you f*ck up and look a c*ck. If you're just sitting at home playing around while you watch tv or whatever, you can let your mind wander while you play. I do this, and sometimes it comes out with some really cool stuff (IMHO). I agree with everything else in your post (and it's a good one!), except [quote name='aryustailm' post='156858' date='Mar 13 2008, 05:12 PM']If you truly have no problem analysing music just by listening, and no problem getting your ideas across, then you should be able to hear something once, and play it back perfectly. (Ignoring speed/physical aspects, just melodic lines/chords/phrases/rhythm).[/quote] That's not true at all. ANYONE can analyse music just by listening and thinking about it, not just musicians. Whether or not they can communicate those ideas is limited by thier language skills. I don't see why you would have to be able to totally analyse every single detail in a peice in one listen. Are you comparing this to reading music or something?

I think that there are rules, but i've no idea what they are. I'd go with personal taste.

I see, that's a great example then! Do you play a piglet with your foot or what?

Heh, that's quite crap. Does your phone not do it? Also, i've just remembered a bit of kit I saw in the "other musically related..." for sale forum. I think it was Tascam, and it was a digital recorder with two built in mics for high quality XY type recording. It'd be more expensive, but that's kind of what you're looking for. I wish I could remember a product name or number or something. You'd do well to find the for sale thread.