51m0n

At least MS comes from a Soul background, you can actually get away with being quite funky on it if thats your bag, rather than just the usual 12 bar blues fodder that you get in covers bands. Its at least a small step in the right direction for me. I'm the only guy in my band who wants it to be funky at all - the rest like blues rock. Its a battle of wills sometimes, but I generally get to subtly undermine them with a bouncier bassline than they though could possibly work OP, I'd swap your day job with mine in a heartbeat mate. Sounds absolutely fine to me!

Reaper. Its the canine undercarriage. Not strictly free but a very open ended try until you buy license.

[quote name='bobbass4k' post='395562' date='Jan 30 2009, 05:07 PM']does Tia Carrera count?[/quote] Who cares? I never even saw the bass.......

I cant stress how much I think you'd help yourself by switching to right handed now if you've only been playing a little while. My son is a leftie, played violin (they only come right handed, picked up bass rightie, and now plays upright as well (and they also are almost always right handed). There is no problem playing wronghanded, it just takes a little while to get used to, and it certainly hasnt stopped the likes of John Patittuci (sp?). All your lefty small market issues and not being able to try basses disappear too. WRT what bass is good for what genre, literally any bass can be made to sound fine in any genre. I'm not kidding. It might look very out of place but if its half decent it can sound fine. What you want to concentrate on is playability and bang for the buck (resale value is a good one too). Mostly whether it works for you in your hands though. You can upgrade electronics, but you will struggle to make significant changes to the inherent ergonomics of a design. Pick what works for you, I bought my Vester in '94, as it just fit my hands and body right, upgraded the electronics to EMGs a few years later (just like buying a new bass in terms of sonic difference, but like keeping the old one in terms of muscle , memory and feeling 'at home'). I only just felt the need to upgrade to a big boys toy (the Roscoe) - sure the workmanship is in a different league, but there is nothing wrong with that - it cost 3 times as much! I dont think I would ever lose a gig because I turned up with the Vester rather than the Roscoe, unless it required 5 strings. Oh and my Vester is the one commonly called a Warwick clone, although actually it really isnt - there isnt a single Warwick that looks the same (vague resemblance to a Thumb) but the hardware is closer to a Spector (esp the brigde which is a complete clone - a very very good!) - in any event it is a really really good mid range bass, that you can easily upgrade the electronics on when the time comes. I'd also strongly recommend you check out the Ibanez SR stuff - even the 300 series is a super playable bass!

Played on one yesterday Not so far away from my sa450 to be honest - I didnt AB them and couldnt tell you any startling difference in tone that stood out for me. Has an even more powerful eq section (4 sweepable eq bands rather than 2) though if thats important to you. I'd recommend the sa450, LMII, LMK, or the ta5## to anyone though, so you might be asking the wrong guy

Another vote for the Ibanez sr300 Got one of these [url="http://www.ibanez.com/BassGuitars/model-SR300M"]Ibanez sr300[/url] for a female friend as her starting bass, and its amazing the tone is fine, the action is great (admit I did have to tweak it abit though), but it weighs nothing, and is so incredibly slim and ergonomically well sorted, its no wonder she's loving playing and really turning into a super bassist. My first bass was utter $@*& in comparison!

[quote name='silddx' post='397941' date='Feb 2 2009, 03:06 PM']All I remember being aware of was the pulse and the accents. It was tight, musical, thrilling, improvised but I was only half aware, like in a dream. Doesn't happen very often, we usually have rigid structure and don't deviate very much, because the song is king. We have a lot of comms going on on stage usually. It was sort of instictive I suppose. Drummer's eyes were closed, he was trippin too.[/quote] [quote name='The Funk' post='397948' date='Feb 2 2009, 03:10 PM']That's a good thing. It's being in the zone![/quote] Beat me to it Mr The Funk sir. Not only is this Zone a very real thing, its been studied, and its said to be the reason behind a lot of top sportspeople's success. I get it sometimes too. Funnily enough I was well in the zone for my entire driving test (many years ago) the examiner was just a disembodied voice, it was retrospectively quite a bizarre experience, essentially just concentrating so hard that you lose yourself completely to the moment. I also find that zone when I'm recording sometimes - then its almost always a really great take, so I'm not surprised your recording turned out so well silddx, not at all! Of course dont mistake the zone with being stoned off your gourd - sometimes it can feel very similar (so I'm told ) but on the one hand you play brilliant and dont realise and on the other you think you played brilliantly but didnt realise you just pissed yourself in front of everyone....

[quote name='birdy' post='397908' date='Feb 2 2009, 02:37 PM']Congratulations!! Lovely bass :-) Steve[/quote] Cheers, I'm loving it!

Hmmm bright green Vester 4 string and as of Saturday's visit to BassDirect the Roscoe Century Standard....

sa450 and a berg ae410 - its the absolute epitome of quality tone for me.

[quote name='alexclaber' post='394349' date='Jan 29 2009, 09:15 AM']Go back fifteen years and we thought 300W was a lot of power and 500W was as much as you could ever need! Many cab makers have hardly moved forwards with their speakers but their amps are far more powerful than then - all that extra power is simply wasted unless you have cabs that can make use of it. And that does not mean you need to look for a cab that is rated at 500W or a 1000W or so on because that only tells you how much heat they can handle - even an expensive 1000W rated neo 4x10" can't handle more than 300W in the lows without distortion.[/quote] +1 my old rig (circa '94) had 2 410s each rated at a then very respectable 280w, driven at 150w each (also had a couple of 15's rated at 250w a piece, driven at 300w each, if you belived crown's specs). This was considered huge overkill. I now have an amp rated at 500w and a cab supposedly capable of coping with 800w RMS (god knows what the peaks are like) - I've certainly not given it even close to enough beans to make it stressed. Frankly the new rig is significantly louder than the old one too, it just doesnt fill the back of a club as well

I need three things from my gear:- Reliability (its GOT to keep working) Functionality (It has to give me what I require in terms of what it can do for me) Tone (I have to like how it sounds) Its also really handy if I can afford it (ever the realist eh!) Seems pretty obvious but it means I have played the same bass since '94, although I did swap out the pickups to improve the tone. And thats a Vester; which many people look down their nose at - but the neck just works for me better than anything else I've ever played yet.... My amp and cabs stayed the same for years, but I recently upgraded very significantly, mainly because my old gear was literally worn out. You know the best thing about that? The advances in technology wrt bass gear over the past 14 years have been enormous! So much more noticeable for not having bothered with it for ages. My only piece of equiptment I wish to upgrade now is my trusty old Vester - again because I ahve worn it out - which is the universes way of telling me to upgrade. [b]Now upgraded - see sig [/b] In truth you only need one bass and one amp and one cable to play bass (and power) and you can play in any style, with a huge range of perfectly useable tones. But all that lovely stuff just keeps calling doesnt it

In: Berg ae410 Focusrite compounder Korg dtr2000 Hartke LH500 (for my son) Out:- Nowt - oops! Not looking to good on the balance sheet is it??

Well in my case my left wrist clicking is a warning that my RSI is about to kick off if I dont a) lay off clicking it and rest it as much as possible and c) make sure I'm not putting it under any undue strain typing at work. I'd keep a close eye on it if I were you....

Fantastic recording and playing! Just really shows what you can do when you work within the limitations of your equiptment. Also a lesson to anyone who is utterly slavish to the click. Really inspirational grooves, must get home and get the bass out now

Cracking effort sir!

[quote name='alexclaber' post='384952' date='Jan 19 2009, 01:55 PM']You can borrow the one I'm currently building once it's done - give me a few weeks! Alex[/quote] Cheers chap, definitely take you up on that!

Replacement LH500 turned up Friday. Major hassle getting it - Coda music struggled to get a replacement since apparently the distributor changed (Korg now?) or someone was pulling my leg. To be fair Coda's communication was excellent throughout, and they tried their best to offer a whole host of solutions before I got a refund and bought the last one from Absolute. Plugged in turned on, first diff was start up time - knackered one took 15 seconds, new one about 3 to click into life. Sweets. EQ pots are now noise free (result). Tone is also better (bit fuller I think). This thing is really really loud too! Its a real beast thru the ae410, wow! Not as refined as the MB sa450, have to be very careful to tame the highs, but that seems to be my lack of experience wiuth this tone stack - I agree its a very very musical thing though. Easily the best amp I've heard to date for that money (not that I've looked at that price range for years so that probably doesnt mean a lot). Struggle to know if it has a 'built-in' tone really sonce the tone stack is from another world to me, really weird idea that one. Son number one really likes it - he's well and truly made up. His Ibanez BTB sounds great through it - very nice indeed. Now he's really on the look out for a cab to run with it - so Alex when can we have a listen to your compact 15 then mate!!!

Billy Sheehan does a lot of his in one of his instructional vids, if you can get over the hair and clothes long enough to stop laughing and watch the playing (he's interviewed by the most annoying c*ck rock wanna-be throughout - its a dreadful vid) Always called it tapped harmonics myself, one of those techniques that really comes to life with a nice bit of compression and plenty of bridge pickup with sparkly new strings Alex - surprised you'd ever noticed it Alex

Practicing techniques/feel/time/groove? Get a metronome, start of with 4/4 quarter notes, 8th notes, 16th notes at a sensible bpm (70ish) Just a single note, absolutely on the button. Now alternate staccato, legato through the above. Now reverse so you are going legato, staccato. Try to do this for 1 minute without losing the feel at all. This is unbelievably zen like, you should really concentrate. Now halve the speed of the metronome. Repeat all the exercises exactly as before, except the metronome only clicks on 1 & 3. Now the real deal, repeat as before except the metronome clicks on 2 & 4. Now go back to the beginning and do the same with an arpeggio or chord, try repeating each pitch twice, before changing to the next (dont forget the staccato legatto variations either. About now you (probably a good couple of hours after you started) may want to kill me, but now play a couple of your favourite groove to that click. You are now about a million times more accurate than you were. Now repeat all the above but at different dynamic levels, use crescendos etc etc, explore playing against a rigid time measure such that you provide all the groove and feel. And now we repeat with slapping. Want to make it hard? Slow the metronome down, slower is harder with time keeping. Wnat to write some tracks/noodle about? Start up the drum machine and waste 4 hours playing at programming it, then play 5 notes on your bass having been uninspired by the weakness of the beats you've programmed.....

[quote name='Mr.T' post='380002' date='Jan 14 2009, 09:40 AM']Simon... Thanks for some sound advice (pardon the pun). I agree that 'cutting' is the way forward, as I think that what I am trying to do with my sound is iron out a mid hump in my neo cab. I know that most people seem to mainly use the two filters to get their sound, and that is Ok... but not doing it for me. I have found that the VPF filter (which cuts at 380hz) is taking out clarity in a band setting with my cabs, and that I need to cut a little higher at about 500hz (I am guessing) to get my sound more balanced and even. My band never have the luxury of a sound check and rarely rehearse, so it is important for me to really get to know my new amp/cabs so I that I don't spend half the gig 'faffing about' getting my gear set-up. I have read that neo drivers have mid humps.... does anyone know at rougly what frequency?[/quote] Pleasure mate. The cab is as much to do with the mid hump as the driver, so I think the question is does anyone know what the mid hump frequency is for cab blah - which I dont. My suggestion for how to go forward would be as follows:- Get to your next gig first and set up your rig. Plug in turn on tune up. Set your input gain with the master on 0 (usual stuff, play some hard 8th notes bring up the gain till you see the blue light and back off until you dont) Bring up the master until the cab is running but not too loud, so as not to unduly annoy the clientelle. Apply ~6-9dB (ie a healthy dose) of cut in the lo mid. Set the frequency as high as it will go for now. Play straight 8ths and sweep back through the frequencies (should take around 4 or 5 seconds to complete the sweep all the way through the frequencies). Take a mental note where the cabs stop have the mid hump, return the frequency to where it just sounded best then adjust the gain to taste. When you get really practiced you'll just go a little past the best point and then track straight back to it, which is even quicker! Total time to set the eq should be about 20 seconds - really. Even quicker when you really get the hang of it. Too much cut and you will affect that 380Hz area you like a bit too much. In which case cut less. Turn up to 'gigging grunt' master level. It wont hurt to run through the procedure a few times at home to familiarise yourself with it. Should be done before the drummer has his snare stand out of the coffin I also never seem to get a soundcheck and rehearsals are clearly for other people too, so I know exactly where you are coming from. Its a lot of the reason why I ended up investing as much as I have in my rig. I just dont have the luxury of tweaking with it when I do get to play out, in fact I even have to rush when recording and if I'm going to mic the righ for that purpose it needs to be almost spot on from the very start. These MB heads really help in that eqing a semi-parametric is so much faster than a graphic IMO.

Coming from a recording engineer background, and having an sa450 too, I'd definitely suggest you go with a (slight) variation on the boost it, twist it suggestion. SInce that is the ethos behind almost all mixing desk channel eqs. My variation is dont boost to max, since that is soooo much that it can make to very hard to hear anything useful. You want a good 6 to 9dB of boost and then sweep until you find a frequency you like, then back the boost right off. Play a bit more then gradually bring on the boost (otherwise you tend to over egg the pudding). Once you get the hang of it you will almost certainly find that semi parametric eqs are far more intuitive, easier to use and accurate than a graphic for tone setting. A useful piece of advice is cut first. Really, boosting an eq tends to accentuate the noise of that eq circuit, it also increases the chance of overloading things further down the chain (poweramp's limiter section in this case) which can be a bad thing! Definitely use your ears, since this isnt your Trace amp the 'same' eq settings (even if you really could get exactly the same eq settings) will _not_ give the same result anyway. It is a completely different amp design after all. IME of the sa450 I would think the eq is easily powerful enough to achieve whatever you need, and it sounds cool just about anywhere you might try it (some settings are seriously not for the faint hearted though!!) Also if you like the sound of your bass then you will probably find (as I did to my surprise) that I was using less and less eq as time went by with the MB stuff. Just a touch of Low or Lo-Mid is about it now, after carefully setting up my tweeter attenuater. It just sounds so darned nice Last point, and I know its been said again and again, but it is always worth a mention to anyone trying out MB stuff, the two 'magic' filters (VPF and VLE) are only off when rotated fully counter clockwise, whereas the eq gains are off at noon. Not trying to teach nan to suck eggs - promise! Enjoy finding _your_ sound again!

Just in case anyone is in doubt The Big One wont fit in a 10 yr old BMW 3 series boot, in case it makes any diff to you Just about goes thru the back door to fit on the back seat though. Mind you not a lot of bass gear does!! The two frequency plots are very revealing, proof my ears aren't entirely shot then Cant wait to hear this with the new Xover Alex, I think it'll be staggeringly good for its weight.

[quote name='dave_bass5' post='374181' date='Jan 8 2009, 04:21 PM']I think Ken likes a middy sound and so i can understand him not having the VPF up too much but ive used it at 12 o'clock on a few songs and it works very well. I agree though, its best used in moderation unless you are after a specific sound.[/quote] Well that fits my point, live if you want to cut through you need mids. Sure you can eq anyway you like, I dont care mate , but if you suck all the mids out you'll move furniture but no one will hear a note you play. KJung has always said he likes a hi-fi(ish) sound, very balanced, with plenty of extension (as long as its in 'useable' realms). I dont like overcooking the bottom end cos you need megawattage to do it and then, as I said, no one can hear a note. Also I dont like a really clacky scratchy top and thats the other thing thats left. So you'd probably think I had a very middly sound (esp since I use an ae410), I think I have 'enough' bottom and not too much zing, with loads of definition and punch. Horses for courses. It would be interesting to see if we've got the measure of each other though eh