[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1344066409' post='1759253']
I'm unconvinced by the appropriateness of using a coloured-sounding DI for recording.
Ideally the sound of the rig is the correct one for the recording in which case the right mic appropriately placed will do the job. Otherwise get a clean feed directly off the bass and either re-amp later in the session when the final sound of the track is coming together, or use an amp and speaker sim in the DAW.
[/quote]
Ah, this is a, possibly 'the' biggest philosophical debate in recording.
Do you record the sounds you want in the mix, or do you record the source from which to make the sound in the mix.
A really really good coloured DI or mic pre sounds different from (and that can mean better or not) than an amp sim, more importantly it may make the player feel the instrumetn differently (in some cases better) than a clean DI.
A real master at tracking is always looking to the mix, a lot of less able recordists, with less of an ear for the mix, or in a situation inappropriate to attempting to capture the mix to tape will be forced to use less colour, less final sounds when tracking.
If I'm mixing a project for someone, and need more tracks from them recorded in a less controlled fashion, I always ask for no eq, no fx. If I'm tracking in an environment I know and trust, I get the final sound at source, which means I use the plyer, instrument, amp, pre, Di, whatever to get the sound right before it hits the AD converter. Because I know what I'm shooting for, and I'm in that place where I'm recording the mix a piece at a time.
The less I have to do in a mix the better!
I very rarely track, more often then not I'm mixing stuff that has been tracked pretty well, but is often flawed ffrom the mix perspective. Then I get out all the tools and fix it as best I can in the box.
The point is that if you are in a position to be able to tell what is right from what is not, the most appropriate solution is always the one that sounds best.