Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

LukeFRC

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    12,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by LukeFRC

  1. @sifi2112 maybe? I think?
  2. That looks excellent!!
  3. having owned a L1000 and played L2000 ... I would use the L1000 passive bass treble and OMG wiring for it - it's' great.
  4. LukeFRC

    Jad Freer LUCE

    obv this is off topic!
  5. LukeFRC

    Jad Freer LUCE

    C2C is the diy arm of the same guy who does Sushibox effects. If you fancy getting the soldering iron out Klaus at Musikding can help
  6. A 21st century style user interface woild help
  7. He is based in Yorkshire and we have spoken before about both coming up!
  8. Interesting! Without giving anything away. No.3 which I disliked I kinda guessed right what that would be. It just sounded like there's a mid scooped to it to my ears. I personally would not want this one. No. 1 - When it started and when from 1st to 2nd on the P bass my first thought was "sound like 1 has higher input impedance than 2" which I think it does - I enjoyed it on the Sandberg, and less so on the P. This was ok. Number 2: Big sounding, colourful mids. This is a nice sounding preamp/DI. But I like this style of thing. I'ld use one. Number 4: was not expecting to like this one. It's clean, with 1 seemed to have the widest freq range- has that balanced warm unhyped sound that is good unless you're going to go for a colour. Enjoyed it on the P bass, less so on the jazz - which is possibly the higher freq of the rounds. (for reference, my dream sound is the old Warwick hellebore preamp, and the last 2-3 years the v2 Colourbox has been at the end of my pedalboard, so I like things with transformers in!)
  9. Posted without seeing the reveal Set 1: Number 1 - meh, brittle Number 2 - Rounder, middy, fatter I like this Number 3- sounds scooped, hyped bottom Number 4- sounds the widest and biggest Set 2: Number 1 - clean Number 2 - richer than No1 Number 3- still sounds scooped Number 4- warm and nice Set 3: Number 1 - sounds ok, nice bottom here Number 2 -mids give as bit of colour Number 3- still scooped Number 4- yeah good. Set 4: Number 1 - sounds ok Number 2 -sounds better Number 3- I don't like the tone Number 4- still good So from that... I'd say I like Number 4 best of them, then Number 2, then Number 1 and Number 3 Purely subjective obviously - I would enjoy owning 4 or 2. Can't wait to see what they are!!
  10. that was a wierd 30 min on google... I have an acoustic 6 string that was made by a Yorkshire luthier who then made resonators.... no google search joy but gemini tracked him down, different guy Steve Evans later Beltona resonators.... anyway I have put the date in the diary and will confer with the other half... tbh last time I came it was sunny and I thought it would be fun to walk up the hill behind the hall too!
  11. That's Quatschmacher isn't it?
  12. you go on another thread on here and people are still trying to nail Michael Jackson synth bass tones... people still have Gill Sans on their PCs...
  13. switching to IEM is enough of a learning curve without everything else!! I had a fun Sunday, the PA guys had mixed me really subby and not much middy punch... so after practice I may have been a bit naughty and turned the mids up on my preamp... sounded great. Took one of my ears out halfway through and my word people were singing loud!
  14. This is not correct for the Nobel preamp- it bb is not a parallel out. The xlr goes via two valve stages, the Jack out goes via all 4 stages.
  15. I saw this just after you listed it - oddly the other night I had a dream about it. I can't remember much of the dream, and I don't have space on my board for it... but have a super random bump!
  16. Oops - OEP was another pedal - this one looks to have proper big ones!!
  17. I just messed around with my hx stomp... using expression to change the time of a delay on 100% with a time of 0.00s to something like 800ms kinda does it. issue is after 800ms it repeats the note
  18. artefakt can do that on the second fs ... It's a pretty awesome envelope filter if you could make use as that. It's also £300 and lots of editing on a computer to get the best out of it so it's got that going against it.
  19. Surely not much over 5 octaves?
  20. See that’s naughty - that’s trade dress and PCB layout that looks the same
×
×
  • Create New...