Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

LukeFRC

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    11,582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by LukeFRC

  1. [quote name='TheGreek' timestamp='1405346200' post='2501024'] Very nice indeed...Looks like mine is going to have to come out from under the bed... [/quote] how many do you keep under the bed! play them all!
  2. I doubt it -and valve power stages are less prevalent for bass and my guess is it would be less useful.
  3. [quote name='pmjos' timestamp='1405234691' post='2499862'] I pm'd you........ [/quote] replied
  4. Ashdown rootmaster has only just come out hasn't it, can you qualify the unreliable claim?
  5. purely academically, but what kinda of super sensitive cab could make 30 valve watts work? Some kind of BFM cab?
  6. [quote name='TheGreek' timestamp='1405023329' post='2498091'] This comes as no surprise. When I was arranging the Herts Bass I contacted lots of companies for donations for our raffle. EB UK, Stuart Clayton and D'Addario all generously donated items and were welcoming and friendly. I contacted Warwick through their Forum and Florin contacted the CEO on our behalf - the outcome was they were [i]not in a position to help out[/i] with the event and declined to make any donations - a company that charges over £2,000 for basses can't even afford to give a grass roots event with their target audience a few sets of strings which cost them what?? £10?? I was disgusted TBH. My new policy is not to buy any Warwick products - they probably don't care cos that's pretty much their philosophy... Anybody want to buy a German Corvette?? [/quote] given they list how much they give to their local communities according to their website.... I don't think it's an awful philosophy - to not give so much PR type giving to things like Herts Bass Bash but give to the local communities where they are based.
  7. My one is from 1977 too! (but doesn't have the BB1200 on the headstock yet) great basses - not a clue why you would sell it!
  8. [quote name='Harry' timestamp='1404804434' post='2495755'] I will say overall my selling/buying experience on here has been great and i use the site a lot in that way, i do get fed up of the really silly offers though, i mean if i have a bass up for £2200, why would i sell it to you for £1200 , if that is what i wanted i would have stuck it up for that in the first place [/quote] It's the trade offers that make me smile. You've got an item that was £2000 new, they generally go for £1250 secondhand and your one is priced at £1100. Why do people get upset when I don't agree that swapping it for their bass that they value at £1100 but cost £1300 new isn't normally a good deal for me!
  9. if you don't really have the $$ what advantage will the limelight P give you that your current one doesn't?
  10. [quote name='dave_bass5' timestamp='1404752848' post='2495428'] I have a feeling you are on the right track, but I really don't want to get rid of my cab if I can help it. And I don't drive so getting around with things is tricky. I really think I just need a temporary change, after all I've used the same rig for a few years and never had any complaints. I'd hate to move the cab on and then find out I'm still not happy so I want to try other avenues first. I'm still thinking about the GK Fusion but want to try out one or two more pre amps first. [size=5][b]There is just something about a certain freq range In the mids that's bugging me.[/b][/size] If I can figure out what it is and how to control it I think I will settle down again. I thought a Paradriver would fix things but I could never settle with that, always tweaking things. I'm going to borrow Fran's VTBass for a gig, and see how that goes again, and if I like what I hear I'll get a VTBass DI and try that. The thing with the Darkglass is it's a lot of money for what is really only a subtle effect (in my case). [/quote] .... doesn't your cab have a very characterful midrange designed in? Still think it's the cab
  11. [quote name='Dad3353' timestamp='1404776249' post='2495675'] Surely not..? Why wasn't I told..? [/quote] I was thinking of you there too!
  12. [quote name='kerley' timestamp='1404725952' post='2494998'] If using a simple passive bass then the number of parts involved is pretty low and it is very easy to get a very nice sounding and great to play bass for very little money. They don't normally arrive like that but the fact that a few tweaks and low cost changes can make a £150 bass great to play proves the point. After that what are you paying for that is really required? More expensive woods - debatable whether that makes it any better Better level of finish - looks nicer but doesn't play or sound better Made in a country with higher labour rates - makes no difference at all Electronics - £10 of pots and wire in whatever bass you pick Pickup - just put the pickup from the £1000 bass into the £150 bass So unless there is actually something technically wrong with the lower cost bass, i.e. the frets are not positioned correctly, then no you do not need to spend anywhere near £1000 for any purpose besides looks. [/quote] the one thing I would add here is the quality of the metal parts used - I don't mean tuners and bridges here but the actual screws - threaded heads of cheaper screws is worth paying a bit more for.
  13. [quote name='Thunderbird' timestamp='1404764458' post='2495558'] I have noticed just lately there has seemed to of been a lot of time wasters about in the market place I have seen quite a few threads that go along the lines of "I will take that mate PM sent" Then 2 or 3 days later on the thread the seller will say " Hi Mate have sent you lots of PM's and you have not answered and you have been online X amount of times since" I have had a bit of this and it really gets on my wick its not the fact that they don't want the item any more even though it would of been nice to sell it is the fact the they are so bloody ignorant and just ignore you I would not be bothered if they just sent me a little message saying "sorry I cant buy this from you I dont have the money" or whatever at least then you can plod on and sell it. Now I know this kind of thing happens all the time on sites like ebay of gumtree etc etc but FFs we are supposed to be a community here and look out for each other that is what makes this place so great. Anyway moan over lol [/quote] I signed up here in september 2007. Ever since I joined it's apparently been getting worse, there's been more time wasters no one has TIM and it was always better in the old days. It was ALWAYS better in the old days, even if it wasn't and we just saw other time wasters and scams and idiots doing stupid things. Maybe it has got worse in the time since you joined - but I suspect, much like humanity, we've always had a selection of utter idiots and totally solid great people - and every gradient in between. Even drummers.
  14. [quote name='Dingus' timestamp='1404731085' post='2495083'] Without wishing to start a row ( but I almost certainly will...) , I really don't think a '78 P Bass is an instrument worth stretching yourself financially in order to own. The kind of money I see a lot of Fenders from that era going for ( especially in vintage guitar shops ) is a joke, quite frankly. Yes, there were some good ones made back then ( if anyone has one then I am genuinely pleased for them ) , but most were dogs , and even the good ones are not what I would call an in-the-region-of- over £1500 + bass in terms of sound, playability or construction. In light of that , the Stingray is a better bet, providing you like Stingrays. With both basses though, a lot depends on the price in regards of whether either represents a good investment. [/quote] +1 what that man said. Just not worth it for the P - the Ray will always have more collector's value (if you care about that) and.. you've got a P bass- why get another one that will cost more but probably not be better for you? And if looking for something old, you need not even spend that much - my 1977 BB1200 is similar age, I would wager would come off as the "better" instrument in some kind of mass bass off against the Precisions and cost a fraction, a fraction of whatever you're thinking of spending on the '78 P bass. So my curveball - if you are going for something old, and you're a precision player.... Leo perfected his original idea.... track down a G&L L1000
  15. I've got a feeling you would do well to go to a bass bash, or visit bass direct or somewhere and try lots of things. Part of me would start to think that if the amp and lots of different pedals/preamps in front of it aren't scratching where you're itching maybe it's the cab that you're not liking
  16. [quote name='molan' timestamp='1404665753' post='2494546'] Pick a brand, literally any brand, and you'll find plenty of negative comments on forums about them unfortunately All I can offer is my personal view, based on user experience, and that of customers I meet in an everyday working situation. [/quote] it must be a bit annoying for some of these wee companies to go on forums and find loads of negative rubbish about your product. mind you if you can be this season's trend on talkbass you've got a 4 month window to make enough to retire on!
  17. [quote name='JTUK' timestamp='1404660281' post='2494480'] Quite understandable as their big amps are the real beans, IMO. Well and truly stolen Ampegs clothes by doing vintage vibey thing better, which is something your good friend will say as well.. The EQ is subtle and as long as your bass sounds good, you don't need a powerful EQ stage, which is a throwback to pre semi para EQ's stages.. and all the better for it, IMO. Mappings are ok in amps and perform a function for some... but the DB amps are matched very well with the cabs to an end goal... and there should be no reason why you do anything other than spend a while setting them up and there on after, complete plug and play... IME. Not a fan of class D amps I've tried. Not that I wouldn't have/buy one... but it wouldn't do the more discerning or important gigs as I have other options... I'd say the same about NEO as well... Can't explain it... but its there, IMO... My smallest amp is 400w into 4 and it is my practice amp at home... [/quote] can we have a limit to the number to cans of worms you open in one post!
  18. [quote name='GrammeFriday' timestamp='1404654772' post='2494424'] Thanks for this info, LukeFRC. To be honest I tend not to read manuals, and I don't work in a bass shop - I just play bass, listen with my ears, and form my own views on what sounds good. [/quote] I used to run sound systems and PA's long before I learned Bass so I have an interest in how something is working as much as if it sounds great or not. In my experience something that sounds great in one situation won't in another - why that is is interesting. Interestingly, in a thread about the upward creep of amp's rated wattage the TC electronics stuff is a useful anomaly where the RH750 putting out a continuous 236w RMS into 4 ohms - which is probably not that much different to your old 80's trace elliot stuff. Which is interesting in itself. I know which one I would rather carry!
  19. [quote name='molan' timestamp='1404654092' post='2494418'] There's only one dedicated cab brand that's really unpopular but that's not something to debate in an amp thread. [/quote] I did tell you that that Bugera stuff wouldn't go down well with your customers!
  20. [quote name='Grissle' timestamp='1404633282' post='2494212'] Actually the power section distortion has as much or maybe more effect on a nice overdriven sound. So its not all the preamp. It's the whole package. Pedals like the VT work to emulate the power section being pushed as well as the pre and explains why its done so well. [/quote] In my mind if a solid state power amp is giving you any noticeable amount of distortion it's not working properly. [quote name='GrammeFriday' timestamp='1404646088' post='2494356'] Interesting post - thanks for your thoughtful reply, Molan. The RH 750 does have an onboard compressor, but you have to dial a dedicated knob to activate it, so [b]I'm not sure about there being any artificial compression baked into it as a default setting[/b]. Maybe, but not that I'd noticed. On the contrary, to me it sounds very neutral when everything is set flat. In fact that was one of the things that I most liked about it when I first tried it out. But that leads me to wonder … how does anyone really know what the "natural sound" of their bass actually is? OK, there is the acoustically natural sound of an unplugged bass, but once you have plugged it into an amp - any amp - it is going to be coloured to some extent by the characteristics of the amp and cab(s) you are plugged into - which means it comes down to personal tone preferences - which are often very subjective, and probably only perceptible to us as bass players anyway. And to be honest I think the differences between modern amps are much less significant than the similarities - if you have an Aguilar, or a TC, or a GK, or a Genz, or a Markbass, or (name your own favourite modern gear) then you probably have a really nice sounding set-up, and the only people who are going to tell you that your tone sucks are other bassists who happen to prefer other brands of amp. So, when you say that people complain that the TC amp robs their bass of its natural tone, I can't help but wonder whether they really mean that it sounds a bit different to the amp that they usually use and are most familiar with - which is in itself no more 'natural' than the TC sound. [/quote] if you look at the document TC link to to describe their amplifier's power spec - here - [url="http://service.tcgroup.tc/media/tc-electronic-power-rating-and-active-power-management.pdf"]TCE Power rating and Active Power Management[/url] - you'll see that a "baked in compression" is part of the design of their amps. And quite a clever one - if it in practice makes any difference to the amps is up for debate (as Molan said based on more experience than me) If you look at the long term W RMS at 4 ohms the RH450 can put out 236 w - interestingly the RH750 also puts out 236w - BUT the burst power it can put out is almost double the RH450. So it's got less of the limiting and compression than the RH450, but my guess a similar low end roll off built in at 50-60hz mark. As a bass amp goes - this could be one of the highest end most conceptually developed bass heads ever made. It's certainly clever. But it's not neutral at all - or trying to be. (ps theses a couple of articles here that are useful in seeing how the RH450 works... http://btpub.boyd-printing.com/publication/?i=76122 )
  21. [quote name='Meddle' timestamp='1404551039' post='2493614'] Irony. People want ridiculously clean amps with massive headroom, so they go out and buy Tech21 VT pedals to put the dirt back into their sound. [/quote] People do generally, normally, want a clean power amp. The preamp makes the difference- so sticking a different preamp before it isn't the stupidest thing.
  22. [quote name='VTypeV4' timestamp='1404515342' post='2493498'] And to my knowledge they never made a production 4 ohm 410 or 115 to get 300w per side.. Cheeky! Most of the time I ran mine with 1153 (compact 15) and 1048H (410 + HF) which was pretty pokey.. I found the 400w model to be pick of the bunch tho.. [/quote] the AH400SMX is one of the amps I would like to buy and have- when you look at the weight and power rating on paper it's quite hard to justify!
×
×
  • Create New...