What has always turned me off high end hi-fi is the fact that, were I in the room with the musicians who made the original music at the time they actually made it, it would not have sounded like that. I always liked ECM recordings for audio quality but, after hearing loads of live Jazz, I never, ever heard anything that actually sounded like, say, Keith Jarrett's piano in real life. The closest I ever came to that, for instance, was Kirk Lightsey playing a good piano in the Norwegian Church in Cardiff Bay about 15 years ago (for those who don't know it, the music space in the church is a round(ish) room lined mosty in wood). The world of the audiophile is rarified but it is also a hall of mirrors designed to feature the equipment and not the music being played. If the music sounds 'better' on a player than it woudl if the musicians were actually there in the room, how can it be judged to be a 'good' sound?