neepheid

Jack Casady uses his own signature basses live.

OBBM FTW.

Didn't sound like the friendliest bunch. I'll soon be trying out a couple of singers for our band and I'll be trying to make them feel as welcome and relaxed as possible so they can do their best. What's the point in making it difficult when you're looking for someone? Auditions work both ways after all.

Logo is wrong, serial is all wrong (never mind the 52 - this serial scheme didn't exist in 1952 and who knows what serial numbers will look like in 2052. It was made on the 909th day of the year.) Screaming fake.

Small update: another pass all over at 180 grit, it's beginning to actually feel smooth now and the swirly orbital sander marks are almost gone. Got some 240, 400 and 600 grit to come then I think it'll be ready to be sprayed. Also, the 4 way switch arrived. Of course it's different to the one in the schematic! So I had to do a bit of detective work on how the switch worked, make a translation table of pin numbers from old -> new then redo the schematic for the switch. Here's what I've got. Would anyone like to idiot check it? My switch works thus: Position 1: A -> 1, B -> 5, C -> 9 Position 2: A -> 2, B -> 6, C -> 10 Position 3: A -> 3, B -> 7, C -> 11 Position 4: A -> 4, B -> 8, C -> 12 A is wired to ground, B takes the (reversed) hot of the bridge pickup, C is final output to the volume pot. X means no connection. Position 1 should give both in series Position 2 should be bridge pickup only Position 3 should be both in parallel Position 4 should be neck only I think I'm right, am I?

Looks remarkably similar to a Gotoh GB7.

[quote name='richardjmorgan' timestamp='1366969558' post='2059552'] Do you know what I think would look awesome on this? White. [/quote] I'm sure it would. Maybe next time

Small update - more steaming/sanding. Also fixed a nasty bit on the back of the lower horn, wood was actually split - I have no idea how people manage this. I mixed wood dust and glue into a paste then filled the hole. Glad it's in the back as it turned out much darker than I anticipated. Still, at least it seems solid.

I had a very productive lunch hour at work, splicing together various bits of pictures from flyguitars.com (thanks Jules once again for your website) to come up with a mockup of what I hope the final result will be: The Ripper that never was! Also have ordered a few bits and bobs - strap buttons, 4 way switch, pickguard and screws.

Nice, the original G-3 was a great bass, this should end up being very similar. Looking forward to seeing it develop. You've maybe got this sorted already, but I found this very useful looking diagram from this thread on TB: [url="http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f38/cadfaels-collection-bass-wiring-diagrams-945744/"]http://www.talkbass....iagrams-945744/[/url] [attachment=133344:g3wiring.pdf] (it's a PDF by the way, so be sure to rename it when you download it, comes down as .ipb for some reason)

As long as everyone can hear me, I couldn't care less what I use. In fully kitted out rooms, I use what's there. If we're practicing out the road (rehearsal space in the middle of nowhere), I take my wee RedSub combo, which despite all the yada yada about the laws of physics is more than capable enough for the job of being heard. I'm not looking down my nose at people who want to use their own gear, I fully understand and can appreciate their arguments (familiarity of sound/operation, getting money's worth out of it etc.) but I'm basically lazy (I mean efficient!) and I CBA to lug about at stuff I don't need to lug about at.

Well, I had a successful day's sanding and steaming out dings. I'm glad I got the front sorted out, it looks like my original idea is back on - classic cherry red translucent. It's sanded all over to 120 grit, still some pink in the horns to get rid of. I guess if I go down the cherry red route then it'll look a bit like this "wine red" Grabber: (picture nicked from Jules' site)

[quote name='MacDaddy' timestamp='1366580687' post='2054528'] For the glasses wearers among us, do you wear them when gigging? I remember reading how John Lennon only had the confidence to wear his after seeing Buddy Holly. Has it ever been an issue? [/quote] It would be an issue if I didn't wear them, I'm so myopic. Also joined the gigging game later in life where I was in a position to say "I am what I am".

I wouldn't agree that parallel wiring of a humbucker makes the tone "thin". It's a non-invasive mod if you use a push-pull pot that's easily reversed if it doesn't do what you expect or want. Out of phase, now that's thin, anaemic and pointless.

Nice one, glad you like it. I'm still not talking to Gibson after my G-3 reissue debacle.

[quote name='Gust0o' timestamp='1366576128' post='2054429'] Sounds like a Grabber - though when they went to the G-3, they finally did away with the moveable pick-up and settled for three single-coils, with the a switch. I had a 1976 G3 and it was a great bass. Looks a very good project Neep. Assume non-standard colours are in, too? I mean, Gibson didn't always give bassists a lot of choice - but you could paint it anything. Red, maybe? [/quote] Well, I had a crazy idea of doing a translucent cherry red like an old EB, but that depends on how well I deal with the various dings on the body.

[quote name='tommorichards' timestamp='1366568732' post='2054237'] I thought the body on these was maple? Or was yours the year that they went to alder? [/quote] According to Jules' site - 1975 and 76 were alder years. All other years body was maple.

[quote name='Gareth Hughes' timestamp='1366558409' post='2053994'] NIce one. Go for the original black. I had a late 70's one that was as sexy as all get out. Were it not for my short arms I'd have happily kept the beast. [/quote] Nah, I'm not fancying black - I think it would be too stealthy with the ebony fingerboard and the obligatory black headstock.

[quote name='Billy Apple' timestamp='1366559057' post='2054005'] Is this all mahogany? [/quote] None of it is mahogany. Alder body, maple neck, ebony fingerboard.

[quote name='the_skezz' timestamp='1366543414' post='2053705'] Never understood what so many people have against Off Topic. It can get heated at times but it's a million times more polite and interesting than the OT section of any other forum I've used. [/quote] I think it's a gigantic waste of time. I also haven't set foot in there since I was rounded on for "offending dyslexics" by having the audacity to start a thread about common misspellings on eBay (Squire, kneck etc.). So it's OK for some people to poke fun but if you're not part of the OT gang then you're not allowed to even attempt to be observationally mildly amusing? Fine. That was years ago, but I'm a grudge bearer. Any time I've appeared in there since, the thread has been moved into OT after my contribution. OT can poke it.

[quote name='Billy Apple' timestamp='1366542070' post='2053670'] Will you put in original pups? Could this take something like the Thunderbuckers? [/quote] Yup, I want to put in original pickups. Or Seymour Duncan replacements if I can't find any.

When I said level, I should have said level, front to back. Nothing wrong with a difference of opinion between the height of the E and the G, whatever it takes to get the action as close to how you want it.

Yup, you should, because they sound great.

The front screw has the effect of tilting the bridge back and forth. Get it wrong and you could end up lifting the threaded inserts out of the body. I'd aim to keep the bridge level. I used to think it was preferable to have the front slightly higher, but I did that with my Epiphone Jack Casady and surprise surprise the G side insert began to lift out. As far as your particular predicament goes, just screw the G side down until you're as close to happy as you're going to get. You basically can only adjust the overall height at either side and hope for the best in the middle. Man, I dislike these bridges.

Mods are people too. Just sayin'.