neepheid

[quote name='davidpike' timestamp='1389965582' post='2340046'] Hi All, Apologies if this type of post has been created before - please point me at the original if it has. I am looking to buy a new bass, and I have very specific requirements. The problem I have is that I have very few shops within easy reach and those that are never seem to have the instrument I want in stock. Searching on the web, the bass I want is in stock at GAK, Thomann and others. However, I am wary of ordering a bass online that I haven't actually played. I am a pretty experienced bass owner and feel confident that I can set up any well-built bass to my satisfaction, unless they ship a complete lemon. Does anyone have any comments, good or bad about ordering a bass online? Just as important, how do these companies react if the bass turns up and it [u][b]is[/b][/u] a lemon? Cheers Dave [/quote] I returned two sub standard basses which I had bought online to PMT in Birmingham. No quibbles. When the replacement also had issues, I was refunded without problem. Even if they aren't faulty and you just don't fancy them, firms are obligated to honour the Distance Selling regulations. You might have to pay return postage, but how much would it cost you to travel to the retailer only to find you didn't like it? It doesn't matter, trying stuff at distance costs money whether you do it in person or remotely. Just remember to keep all the packaging until you know you're happy with your purchase.

I'm not signing this. The parties directly involved need to get down to some proper dialogue and compromise instead of the polarised, defensive nonsense that has gone on so far, of which this petition is part.

You probably don't need a new/better bass, but if you want it, providing it doesn't impinge upon the maintenance of the roof over your head or the regularity of your meals then go for it. If it's street cred you're after then don't buy a Gibson bass - you'll be met with a mix of disbelief, confusion and ridicule in about equal quantities A Gibson SG will feel kinda familiar to you and I guess the addition of the bridge pickup will give you some variety, but for a complete change of sound it's probably best to go in a different direction. Fender Mustang will be completely different to the EB-0 but equally limited with the single pickup (but that sound might be exactly what you're looking for). If you think you could stretch to 32" scale then there's the Squier VM Telecaster Bass Special, which has a Wide Range humbucker at the neck and a Jazz pickup at the bridge. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkcmO1DunDU[/media] Just some ideas.

I've just used SoundCloud for that exact purpose. It's dead easy and the sound expands into a nice wee widget in the Facebook post. [url="https://www.facebook.com/TheInevitableTeaspoons"]https://www.facebook...itableTeaspoons[/url] Simple answer to the "does Soundcloud sneakily purloin your rights?" is no - [url="http://help.soundcloud.com/customer/portal/articles/243748-does-soundcloud-claim-any-rights-to-my-music-"]http://help.soundclo...ts-to-my-music-[/url] Long answer (from [url="http://soundcloud.com/terms-of-use"]http://soundcloud.com/terms-of-use[/url]) "Any and all audio, text, photos, pictures, graphics, comments, and other content, data or information that you upload, store, transmit, submit, exchange or make available to or via the Platform (hereinafter "Your Content") is generated, owned and controlled solely by you, and not by SoundCloud. SoundCloud does not claim any ownership rights in Your Content, and you hereby expressly acknowledge and agree that Your Content remains your sole responsibility. Without prejudice to the conditions set forth in Your Use of the Platform you must not upload, store, distribute, send, transmit, display, perform, make available or otherwise communicate to the public any Content to which you do not hold the necessary rights. In particular, any unauthorized use of copyright protected material within Your Content (including by way of reproduction, distribution, modification, adaptation, public display, public performance, preparation of derivative works, making available or otherwise communicating to the public via the Platform) may constitute an infringement of third party rights and is strictly prohibited. Any such infringements may result in termination of your access to the Platform as described in the Repeat Infringers section below, and may also result in civil litigation or criminal prosecution by or on behalf of the relevant rightsholder. We may, from time to time, invite or provide you with means to provide feedback regarding the Platform, and in such circumstances, any feedback you provide will be deemed non-confidential and SoundCloud shall have the right, but not the obligation, to use such feedback on an unrestricted basis."

I enjoyed that, it's got a definite pace about it, it's travelling, it's agile and it's crisp. I think it's well mixed, vocals are clear and prominent, but no elements are overpowering. It's got that weird feeling of space and at the same time being ballsy and substantial. Bass tone has an enjoyable bit of grit in it when the song requires it. I don't have anything to gripe about in 3 listens. Nicely played, everyone involved.

I enjoyed that little clip. It's hard to talk about something which is intended to be in the background of some visuals in the same way as one discusses foreground music, so I'd rather tell you what I imagined was going on in the accompanying film. I either thought of someone trying to remember something/someone at the beginning, then they find what they're looking for in the calmer next bit, then something bad happens to them when the pace quickens again. Either that or a safe cracker or someone disarming a bomb. Concentrating, moment of slo-mo where they turn the dial/cut the wire, pace quickens as they think they've messed it up, then it's OK. Musically speaking, it's probably good for running underneath some accompanying visuals - atmospheric without being overly attention seeking, changes mood with what I guess to be scene changes or story twist/turn.

I'm sure I've said this before (like the last time there was this bellyaching) - if you want a bass with no pickguard, then buy one which was designed not to have a pickguard

[quote name='Lowender' timestamp='1383353254' post='2263636'] What did you think you'd never like, later to find it suited you well? [/quote] Goat cheese

I tried D'addario half rounds and I also found them rather sticky when sliding. I am unlikely to try them again on the basis of that experience.

Also BOX on Sauchiehall Street. [url="http://boxglasgow.com/play-here/"]http://boxglasgow.com/play-here/[/url]

Ugliness is contagious, it would seem.

Modified Epiphone Les Paul Standard bass. Everyone knows the story around here, but a brief synopsis - black carved top body with cream binding, rosewood fingerboard with trapezoid inlays, black neck, black headstock with flowerpot inlay. 2x EMG-HB pickups, EMG-BQC 3 band EQ with mid sweep. Added pickup selector switch in the usual LP location. Black John East knobs. The only one I have sold and missed. Contacted the guy I sold it to a while back and needless to say he's in no hurry to sell it back to me

Fat and contented, nothing to gripe about, eh? Subvert it - gripe about having nothing to gripe about. Aha!

No point in having basses lying around not being played.

It's probably just clever lighting and good photography, but I think it looks particularly awesome in Thomann's pictures:

[quote name='Prime_BASS' timestamp='1383303083' post='2262788'] That's rather simplifying my arguement which isn't my main focus at all. its a disgusting looking thing. However, I find it weird to pay the sum they are asking when I can easily get something cheaper, made in the same region or not, [b]and it just be as good, if not better.[/b] If it's worse, for whatever reason, it's not hard with the left over change to make it substantially better. I don't think they've been out long enough, but the secondhand market will be the teller of how much value these really have. All in all I could care less about where it's made, I'd have any bass from anywhere providing I like it. And I hate this one. [/quote] [b]Tsk, assumptions.[/b] Well, my real beef was with the fact that you obliquely referred to me as an indie hipster, seeing as I like the thing. Not that I'm entirely sure what that means, but seeing as you associated the term with a bass you so vehemently loathe, I can only assume it is pejorative

Anti-Chinese bass sentiments? What is this, Talkbass?

I think my fondness of the slightly rounded body shape stems from my ownership of a Gibson G-3. And it continues - I have owned 4 BBs (currently have 2) and have a Gibson Ripper in the process of being refinished/rebuilt. I suppose my Epiphone Jack Casady isn't exactly sleek either...

Well, they've reached Edinburgh. Getting closer.

[quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1383227423' post='2261810'] Nothing wrong with that aspect is there? [b]I just get a little fed up with cover band advocates slagging off unfamiliar originals bands because of perceived quality issues[/b]. Those of us in originals bands know how hard it can be to create a body of work and build an audience, regardless of the perceived quality of the music. There's no monetary gain to speak of, just lots of hard work for the pleasure of playing to often indifferent audiences. [/quote] And people in covers bands get fed up of people in originals bands looking down their noses at them for being unoriginal, selling out, making more money for perceived less effort/artistic value or whatever the damn beef is. At the risk of sounding like a total sap - we're all performing music here, can't we all just get along?

[quote name='Paul S' timestamp='1383225667' post='2261776'] This seems to have regressed into a 'covers vs originals' thing again. [/quote] [b][size=6]AGAIN[/size][/b]

Yamaha TRBs = "Fender copies", really?

They all sound equally slappy to me

School bass? What school bass? I played some recorder at primary school and we had some (probably classic and cool now) Casio keyboards at secondary. Cellos and violins were the order of the day for instrumentation for folks who took it seriously IIRC (I didn't do music at school beyond second year). If I knew then what I know now and all that.

[quote name='Lowender' timestamp='1383160466' post='2261041'] Hmm, this was downloaded from my itunes as an mp3, not a phone. Not sure why it's not opening. [/quote] See post above.