Andyjr1515

Hi [url="https://soundcloud.com/andy-rogers-6/custom-eb-3-style-sound-clips"]Re-done the sound clips of the 6 positions through our small Yamaha PA here[/url] The sound difference between a couple of the notch positions on the recording is subtle but live is definitely discernible and is more apparent with different styles of play Sorted the brass nut, replacing the zero-fret: Just got to tidy up the back of the neck, get some round-wounds and a case and it's done

[quote name='Oopsdabassist' timestamp='1477432069' post='3162266'] Those notch filter sounds are very nice, the bridge on its own is too zingy for my taste, but a great range there I reckon! [/quote] Thanks I'm going to try it through the PA speakers later this morning. Ref the zingyness, the tone knobs are on 10 and do tone it down nicely. However, the surprisingly zingy one is the 'both on'. For certain things it is very useable, but it surprised me that adding in the mudbucker to the bridge makes it even more metallic! I checked to make sure I hadn't inadvertently set it out of phase but pretty sure it's not. In this setting there is also a sweet spot as you tweak the bridge vol down where there is a fuller sound but still different to the others. Pity Pete will probably just use one tone...and that one will be the one that the selector just happens to be on when he plugs in

Ooo....getting to the exciting stage where it starts to look like a real bass

[url="https://soundcloud.com/andy-rogers-6/custom-eb-3-style-sound-clips"]Comparative sounds, now through a small PA, here[/url]

OK Back from Scotland this afternoon and straight down into the cellar to sort the soldering I was cogitating about while I was away ...and, as far as the electronics go, it's finished This is what it finally looks like: I have it now set up as:[list] [*]Pos 1 - bridge only [*]Pos 2 - bridge and neck [*]Pos 3 - neck only [*]Pos 4 - neck with notch filter incl 0.001uF capacitor [*]Pos 5 - neck with notch filter incl 0.010uF capacitor [*]Pos 6 - neck with notch filter incl 0.047uF capacitor [/list] This gives me six fully usable and distinctly different sounds, with positions 4, 5 and 6 being variations of position 3 progressing towards the bass end. I've done some sound clips through my little Vox electric guitar amp which I will post but tomorrow I'll also see if I can get some better clips through the PA speakers. Tomorrow should see this pretty much finished excepting popping some roundwounds on (any suggestions anyone?) and getting a hard case for it.

The bridge pickup looks like a hofner staple pickup to me....

That looks superb. Great job, Grangur

[quote name='Bastav' timestamp='1477309026' post='3161224'] Well, not much. Ive been moving house and this coupled with the fact i dont have a dedicated workspace has led to a forced building hiatus. Also i started another project, so ive now got three builds to distract me from more important things [/quote] Sounds good...means we can hassle you three times as much

[quote name='TheGreek' timestamp='1477226789' post='3160671'] He'll need one of these eventually: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Gibson-SG-bass-hardcase-/361773242199?hash=item543b5d9757:g:Z-8AAOSwYIxYA8Sy Not mine... [/quote] In fact, Pete's asked me to get him a hard case. Trouble is, I'm not at home and can't be sure what length this build is...

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1477212786' post='3160519'] High pass and low pass are easy - you only need a resistor and capacitor. For high pass, put a capacitor between the pickup and volume pot (i.e. in series with the pickup). If you are using a 500k volume pot, then try cap values of about 2.2n (0.002). Bigger values give more bass/lower corner frequency and vice versa. [/quote] Brilliant - thanks, samhay Will be back in the workshop on Wed. I'll let you know how I get on

I may well run out of time, 3below, but I think I should be able to rig up a working high pass filter as one of the other switch options Although my original attempt failed, that was probably more due to a wiring error I corrected when I followed samhay's diagram and the suggestion of a much lower resistor. Had I done the same two changes on the parallel version, I may well have come out with a fully functioning high pass! In that all I'm trying to do is give a variety of usable sounds with positions 4,5, 6, options of high capacitor notch, low capacitor notch and high pass could be a good plan (if I can get it to work!)

Any more progress with this, Bastav?

The body has come up wonderfully well

Although they are sometimes viewed as a bit of a poor relation, I highly rate the DiMarzios I fitted a Model P to Kert's Camphor single cut PJ based on very good user reviews and it sounds wonderful. The Model One I've just fitted to the EB3 style present build is equally impressive.

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1476980736' post='3158995'] 220n would make for an incredibly dark tone control on a passive bass or guitar. In any case, I have a good stash of caps and am happy to pop some in the post if you want to try other values. [/quote] Thanks also for the offer, samhay I should be OK I think

[quote name='3below' timestamp='1476995636' post='3159176'] Andyjr: If you have a shopping list of resistors and capacitors pm me. You never know what might turn up in the post [/quote] That's very kind of you, 3below I think I'm OK - I've ordered a 20k trim pot and a .001 cap that were only a couple of £'s. A three year course in electrical systems and electronics would be useful, though, if you've got a spare one of those lying around

[quote name='3below' timestamp='1476995049' post='3159162'] Andy, are you now getting useable or even better tones from the varitone? Samhay, would you be able to model the mark1 RLC circuit? [url="http://www.flyguitars.com/gibson/bass/EB3_schematic.php"]http://www.flyguitar...3_schematic.php[/url] I am still intrigued what tfrequency response this circuit will produce taking account of the pickup as a voltage source with inductance and impedance. I do not have access to suitable modelling software (this tells me I should get some for the day job). Thanks. [/quote] Hi 3below I'm not convinced there is any really useful difference between the notch capacitor options....probably more a case of picking the best one...but I think the general difference to the main three unnotched settings is dramatic and usable. Very close in some terms to simply dropping down the tone to zero, but in someways quite different. Certainly now got a usable level of volume. Whether it is what it is supposed to sound like, I have no idea, of course, but then again nor will Pete Really grateful for all the effort and info from the three of you though - and I really do now know the difference between a low pass filter, a high pass filter , a band stop filter and a band pass filter. Trust me...that is real real progress for me and which you, BigRedX and samhay are wholly responsible

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1476988665' post='3159084'] The baritone circuit that I have for the Gibson 355 guitar uses 0.001µF, 0.003µF, 0.01µF, 0.03µF and 0.22µF capacitors for the 5 filter positions (the 6th is a bypass) if that helps? [/quote] That's useful info, BigRedX. I've got a 0.001 cap on order - I'll be interested what it sounds like compared with the others.

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1476989645' post='3159092'] That's correct for the notch filter. The corner frequency will be different for a more conventional low pass filter (tone control), but vintage p bass tone controls use 100n, which most consider to be about as dark as anybody would ever need. 220n is darker. [/quote] Ah - I understand what you are saying. Yes - in normal tone position, a capacitor of .047 is about as high as I go. [url="https://soundcloud.com/andy-rogers-6/eb3-notch-comparisons"]This soundclip here[/url] is not terribly useful because somewhere along the line something is clipping, but it gives some idea of the type of sound coming out. It sounds like an old fashioned moog synthesiser to me (think The Persuaders theme). I announce each of the settings, but on the file, all neck pickup, is : no notch, tone at 10; no notch, tone at zero; notch with .011 capacitor; notch with .047 capacitor; notch with .022. You can't really hear it here, but through the amp the .22 does sound brighter and clearer. However, the .047 is noticeably louder than either of the other capacitors. I'll try and record some better quality samples next week Thanks again for all the input, folks Andy

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1476980736' post='3158995'] 220n would make for an incredibly dark tone control on a passive bass or guitar. In any case, I have a good stash of caps and am happy to pop some in the post if you want to try other values. [/quote] If I understand the figures above, doesn't the 220n knock out the low frequency 280Hz? (It must be said that I probably don't understand the figures above )

Thanks again, samhay I've got .011uF; 0.022uF and .047 on hand. If PRS have ever fitted 0.22uF (because that is what seems to be written on the side of a cap out of a PRS circuit, then I may have one of those too I may be able to find a bit of time this eve and I'll try them out. Failing that, it'll be middle of next week. Either way, I'll let you know I'll also order a 0.001uF - it will be waiting for me when I get back

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1476972286' post='3158922'] Great - sound like we are on the same page. Below is the simulated frequency response of an RLC filter (image a few posts above) with your transformer (1.5H inductance and 148 ohm resistance in series with this inductance) and a 22n capacitor. The top graph shows the output when driven by a perfect voltage source. The bottom graphs shows the same filter driven by a simulated guitar (not mudbucker) pickup. Notice how there is a lot more treble rolled off, and this will get worse with a bigger pickup like the mudbucker. In both cases, the resistor is varied from 1k-100k. As the resistor gets larger, two things happen: 1. The notch gets broader 2. As this resistor works as one half of a voltage divider with the volume pot (I asssumed 500k here), larger resistances give additional signal lose at all frequencies. Bottom line - less resistance is more signal. Also, the original varitones switched in a range of capacitors, and this is still a good thing to do with the rotary switch. I can suggest values if you tell me how many values to suggest... p.s. look like a resistance of about 10k would be a good choice, so it seems the computer agrees with your ears. [/quote] Brilliant! Thank you so much, samhay, BigRedX and 3below And thanks particularly for the above, samhay I have switch positions 4 5 and 6 so it would be three different capacitor values. The present one is, as you say, .022uF

Ah.....but I DO have a 25k linear pot! Just wired that temporarily and think I'm getting somewhere! With the pot about midway, it's almost same volume as the clean neck pickup, it's in the same tonal range as the neck pickup with tone rolled right off but a tad different. I think this is usable The other two switch positions, taking it through the inductor's split primary and full secondary, make very little difference to going through the full primary. As such, I might have a look to see if, instead, I can use the three positions to bring in three different values of capacitor... Still got no idea what I'm doing but it's immense fun (other than I should be doing other things today ) I will get a trim pot to replace the full size pot so I can use that in the final version. Thanks for all of the input so far, folks. I think I'm starting to clamber up some of the early foothills of the enormous learning curve mountain

[quote name='samhay' timestamp='1476967398' post='3158874'] >I think the above is what could be predicted? Yes - that sounds about right. The mudbucker has considerable resisance - perhaps 30k, so you probably won't want to add much additional resistance to get this work (2 x 100k resistors in parallel are 50k total resistance). I have seen some design(s) that use a resistor to balance between pickups, but these are mixed before the signal makes it to the volume control. The transformer will have somewhat variable inductance (this varies with frequency) and non-negligable resistance. If the resistance is more than a few k ohms then the notch becomes very broad. Are you using a blue LT44 transformer from Maplin? [/quote] Hi, samhay No - its a Xicon 42TL021-RC (but is indeed blue ) I wondered about trying a much smaller resistor but don't think I have any in my bits box. Shows how much I know though - I assumed the higher the resistor the narrower the band. If the garage do some magic fixing my car later today, there's a Maplin near where I pick it up from. If so, I'll get a variety of smaller resistors to try them out. What value(s) do you reckon is worth a punt?

OK, folks I've done a few experiments up to the point that MrsAndyjr1515 has 'reminded' me that there are more pressing things to do today I've basically wired it like this (as far as my little brain can work out): ...which my newly acquired education tells me is a Band Stop Filter. The results are interesting, and I think as the notch filter has been described:[list] [*]With a 100k resistor, definitely different to the mudbucker alone. Similar to the bucker with the tone turned right down, but less boomy. Very quiet in comparison, though. [*]With 2off 100k resistors in parallel (ie 50 ohms?) it is louder - not as loud as the clean mudbucker but again bassier, fluffier but without the boom of the bucker with tone right down [*]With no resistor, similar in volume and tone to the mudbucker with the tone wound right down [/list] If I have understood the theory right of what the notch is trying to do and what the resistor is doing within it, I think the above is what could be predicted? Anyway - must go and do some other stuff!