Andyjr1515

And just how splendid is that! Beautiful.

Someone asked if I was going to add a fingernail scoop for the control hatch. I solve the hatch access in a number of different ways and sometimes do carve a scoop in the body. However, I'm no skilled nitro painter and couldn't be sure that it wasn't going to look a bit naff, so used an alternative that has worked pretty well on a number of builds. It's simply to shave half a mm or so off at one end of the rebate, so that a firm push in the right place lifts the whole thing that can then be just lifted off: I've had a decent day at it today: - fretboard re-dressed - neck re-slurry-and-buffed - still have to tidy up the wiring with some ties, but we have sound! So far I've just tried the 'tap test' - but the sound difference from the three different voices of the Fluence bodes very well indeed Tomorrow I'll get the neck and strings back on and see what we've got. Then that leaves just a tidy up around the now-fitted Dunlop flush strap locks and I reckon it's done. And the plan is to meet @Happy Jack at the forthcoming SE Bassbash, in a couple of weeks' time, and hand it across.

Just got back and had a cup of tea! Great, great day. Excellent to catch up with old friends and make new ones. @scrumpymike , MrsScrumpy and the Scrumpettes are all beyond legend for the organisation, the endless teas and coffees and, without question, the best lunch in the South West.

Lovely job

I'm in. Anywhere OK

And - the action is perfect! That is a genuine surprise. And it's useful too because it means that @Happy Jack will still have a fully-interchangeable-with-no-adjustment-needed fretless neck when he gets bored with the whiteness of his Mike Lull and decides he wants that repainted in pink too! There is very little to do with the neck other than sand any glue wipes away and re-slurry and buff it. Same with the fretboard. It's starting to look like a bass: If I get some time this afternoon or tomorrow morning, I'll have a bash at fitting the electrics.

Well, that's gone surprisingly pleasingly well! And even more surprising pleasing, is that it's flat! : So tomorrow, when the glue is fully cured, I'll get it on the bass and see what I need to do to get the action where it should be Bridge earth is also done so pretty soon I can see if I can get it wired up and making a sound or two.

The trussrod's arrived and so the clamps are out!

Lovely job

Strictly speaking, because the Fluence is an active pickup, the circuit shouldn't need shielding - but better safe than sorry: The knobs and inset straplock ferrules have arrived too. The body has buffed up nicely - the stripes are a reflection of the bars of the grandchild's cot: The trussrod is on its way - hopefully with me tomorrow. Main activity tomorrow, regardless, will be drilling for and fitting the bridge earth, drilling and fitting the ferrules - and then, all being well, wiring it all up Then it's just refitting the fretboard and finalising the neck angle.

Yup - I like it

Within reason, you can be fairly adventurous with the body wood/woods. As long as the timbers are seasoned and the bridge can be held rigidly, most other characteristics are not critical. For neck wood, though, it is best - especially for a first build - to ensure that the blanks are from someone who supplies specifically for instruments to ensure that the cut and consistency is fit-for-that-purpose. The most common (for common, read 'relatively reliable and workable') timbers used are mahogany or maple. Maple is harder to cut/shape/sand but is stiffer and more durable. Mahogany is generally lighter-weight, softer, easier to work with but a little more prone to dints and scrapes. It's a generalisation, but David Dyke (www.luthiersupplies.co.uk) neck timbers tend to be available planed and 'ready to glue' ...but therefore can be quite pricey. Some of the other suppliers' neck woods will be more 'ready to plane' but sometimes correspondingly cheaper. You will find most of the bigger specialist suppliers quite approachable and will generally be happy to advise - David himself or any of the team at David Dyke's and Kirk Bolton at www.exotichardwoodsukltd.com are particularly helpful.

I spoke to my band mate Pete to see if he'd got the Piccolo Bass at home but it's out on loan to one of his friend's who's recovering from a knee operation, so it will be just these two I'll be bringing: Clearly, the one of the left is the Camphor Singlecut and the one on the right is the SWAPAATBWADS fretless (Same woods and proportions as a Thumb but, wisely, a different shape) The Camphor Singlecut is the one that needs a good home. Offers around £1500 will secure. This was the 'No Treble' Bass of the week it was awarded in 2016: https://www.notreble.com/buzz/2016/06/20/bass-of-the-week-ajr-guitars-singlecut-bass

I like that contrast

Coming along nicely Good move with the Nova

Fascinating stuff @Hellzero (and NICE bass ) Only issue is that I don't think ebony expands...certainly ebony fretboards shrink...but that would bend it the other way... But certainly the answer is somewhere in this kind of area and most definitely linked to the weather. Like you, I've come across loads of folks who have had all sorts of things go on this summer. A pro-player I know asked me about his mandolin - honestly, the neck was like a banana! I suggested, especially as they don't have truss rods, that he waits until the weather cools down and then check again. Within three weeks it was completely back to normal!

OK I can't be certain which - and both are equally improbable - but there are two possibilities or a combination of those. A significant factor is that Jack shipped me the neck in early July. And July in the middle of the UK was the hottest month on record with temperatures up to 40 degrees and days above 38 degrees. The neck was kept in a spare room wrapped in bubble wrap and away from direct sunlight. It is likely that the trussrod was still tensioned to give back-bow as I hadn't asked Jack to relieve the tension and didn't start working on the neck itself for some months after receiving it. @Happy Jack had been using the bass and had not experienced any buzz or trussrod issues - which he certainly would have if it had already gained such a degree of Back-Bow (remembering that I was unable to make any tangible difference to that back-bow when I strung it up to full tension this month) So one possibility is what @Hellzero suggests: - that the maple neck wood shrank in length over that period. If it did that, and the ebony stayed the same length, then it would act a bit like a bimetal strip used in thermostats. The maple would try to shrink at the back, the ebony, though, would stop it shrinking at the top (the glue join) and so it would bend. But if that was the case, you would expect that there would be at least a hint of that back-bow remaining once the ebony was removed, as that maple at the top will have been held at its original length through the hot weather and now back to largely normal temperatures. Also, this is fully seasoned rock maple. And shrinkage, even when it is freshly cut, tends to be tangential and radial as the sap hardens and shrinks. There is pretty much nothing in the wood structure that would make it shrink lengthwise. It's why sharp fret ends can often be a problem over the years - the fretboard is shrinking in width - but I've never come across, say, an acoustic with fixed bridge go out of intonation because the neck's getting shorter! The other possibility is: - that the high temperatures allowed a miniscule softening of the glue. Yes, 40 degrees is far short of the 180 degrees that I've just used with my iron to get it off. But remember that it is probable (my bad) that the truss rod was still tensioned throughout that period and the neck would have had a back-bow on it...and normally with a bass or guitar, the neck is straight because the strings are also on so even if softening did happen, nothing would go anywhere. So if there was even the smallest amount of softening, over weeks of very high temperatures it is at least feasible that the fretboard and neck would slide relative to each other, in the same way that laminated sides of acoustic guitars are made. Once the temperatures cooled, the glue would revert to rock-solid and the curve would be permanently set - until the laminate (fretboard) was removed. But there lots of 'ifs and buts' with this possibility too! Both possibilities are in the zone of things I've never ever come across before. It's a bit of an enigma But the good news is that, whatever the cause, the neck IS straight, the fretboard IS undamaged and so all it needs is a clean off of the glue from the mating surfaces and a new truss rod and we will end up with a straight serviceable neck closely followed by a fully playable shell pink bass

No So no

Yes - I don't think it is quite that, but it almost certainly to do with what those two woods have been doing in the unusually hot weather of this summer...and maybe the glue too... I'll post shortly.

That's my fault. I should have said - ignore the truss rod itself on those pictures (which is a single action one). I was using the pictures more to describe which way the neck bends with string tension or truss rod.

It's easier if you think of a bow and arrow bow.

OK - let's start with the basics. With acknowledgement to theelectricluther.com who's website has this picture: For clarity, I'll use this terminology above in the explanation of what I think is going on. Oh - and bear in mind that this is an Andyjr1515 interpretation of the physics of a bass guitar But first of all, some basics and where it was that this neck didn't respond to the basics So - what we are aiming for is pretty much the Flat-Neutral neck when the strings are tightened to pitch But if you didn't have a truss rod or stiffening rods in the neck, the string tension will pull the neck into a bow - Up-Bow in the above diagram. And so what the primary aim of the truss rod is to apply an opposite force - a Back-Bow So if the Up-Bow of the string tension = the Back-Bow of the tightened truss rod, you should end up with a Flat-Neutral Neck. "What about neck relief?" you ask. That's simple. Pretty much ANY Back-Bow will cause the strings to buzz in the middle of the fretboard. So, the way of making sure that, regardless of 'normal' temperature changes and minor tuning differences, you never end up with Back-Bow, is to add a little Up-Bow. And so, if you take the strings off a bass and the neck off, but don't loosen the truss rod, it will have a back-bow, created by the truss rod: And when if you then loosen the truss rod, it should return to how it was when it was made, Flat-Neutral: Our problem was that when I loosened the neck, it still had the Back-Bow. And a big one - at the centre of fretboard it was 2mm higher than the nut and heel That in itself is not that unusual - often a neck will end up with a 'set' bow...and, depending on the circumstances, this can be in either direction. But it is usually small. And with a two way trussrod - capable of bending in either direction - easily correctable. And usually, if it is a back bow, then simply fitting the neck and strings and bringing them up to pitch will straighten it. But in my case, with the strings fitted, there was still a back-bow...and a big one So I turned the trussrod in the opposite direction as much as I dared to create an Up-Bow force so that the trussrod was adding to the tension of the strings to try to counteract the back bow. It reduced the back bow, but only a small amount - from 2mm to 1.5mm. So I put a clamp on at the middle of the neck to try to force it straight and hope that the wood would 'remember' the new position: And after two days of this extreme force... ...as soon as I took the clamp off, it sprang back to exactly where it had been to start with, with a severe back bow with or without the truss rod acting to counter it. And so: - the fretboard just bends to what the neck is doing - and so it must be the neck underneath the fretboard that is bent - and when I take the fretboard off, I would find that the maple neck has a 2mm or more set back-bow in it that I would need to plane flat Hmmm...no. As in the previous post, the neck beneath was flat. Completely flat. Conclusion in the next post

Well...maybe not. Remember who made the neck in the first place

And so, the fretboard removal. Pretty straightforward. After masking the paint on the headstock (I don't want to have to do that again ) I made a small jig so that I could apply pressure from the heel end without having to clamp, and thus possibly damage, the neck: To remove a fretboard, the good news is that almost all manufacturers and builders use Titebond or similar...and it softens with extreme heat. The really good news is that I made this neck...and so I know it's used Titebond. So first tool is an electric iron. I use a cheap travel iron: It takes a LOT of heat. Max temperature and sitting on the wood here for at least 15 minutes before I even start (and this is a thin fretboard!). After 15-20 minutes, I test the joint with a single-edged razor: Then I 'borrow' one of MrsAndyjr1515's pottery tools to start ease the thin steel end between the fretboard and neck: And that allows me to start sliding my perfect-for-the-job piece of sheet steel (it's actually a proper tool designed to help hand bend acoustic guitar sides) into the gap. Then, mm by mm, you can inch (there's a contradiction) the iron and sheet steel forwards. This is after about 45 minutes after the initial success with the razor blade: Patience is the name of the game. Any attempt to rush risks snapping the fretboard. And around 1.5hrs in total - it's off, with neck undamaged and fretboard in one piece : Note the amount of forward bow that trussrod was trying to apply to counteract the 2mm back bow of the neck. So - that maple must be SEVERELY back bowed to resist that truss rod and still bend the wrong way, right? So I put my levelling beam along it, expecting it to be sitting on a substantial hump in the middle of the neck: Flat as a pancake! And that has led me to the position of having never, ever seen something like this and not believing, if it hadn't been right in front of me, that what has happened could happen. But explaining to those interested what has happened will take me a little while. The good news is that all it needs is a new truss rod (because this one is now comprehensively f****d ) and then the fretboard gluing back on

Normally, I would say yes. But in this case no - not needed. It will take me a couple of posts to be able to explain (I'll have to draw some diagrams) but what I've just discovered, I wouldn't have thought possible. Good news is that it is easily fixable. I'll update the progress shortly...but the conclusions will take a little longer.