Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

HazBeen

Member
  • Posts

    3,155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HazBeen

  1. Stop doing this Robbass..... I love the look of this bass, but cannot justify the cost and adding of yet another bass to my collection.
  2. I sold a 5 and still regret it. Great tone and playability.
  3. I got a G&L SB1 in a recent (part) trade and really do not have any need for it so am sticking with my good 'ole L2500. Low exchange rate Euro to GBP mean I can offer this for 650GBP shipped insured to UK, maybe even 600 if I ship with neck detached. A real players instrument with dings, scratches and wear associated with almost 30 years of use.[list] [*]Neck is straight, frets have enough life in them [*]Pickups are the G&L MFDs, not the later Seymour Duncans [*]Neck is dated October '86, body November '86 [*]Old headstock shape [/list] Some particulars worth noting: The scratch plate is not original, pots are not original (capacitor is it appears), jack is not original, strap buttons are not original (although appear to be genuine G&L). All other hardware and components original; most importantly the MFDs are original. The scratch plate fitted appears to be a close but not perfect fit so you can see some little imperfections with how it is aligned and fitted to the body. Some people call it MOJO , sounds great. A P on steroids. Does not come with the original case (not present) but does come in a Warwick Rockbag gigbag. Apparently this came from USA as is but I cannot confirm or disprove. Looking for a sale on this only really. Anyone? Pics (sorry not great, but I tried ...): [url="http://s87.photobucket.com/user/welcometombh/library/GandL%20SB1"]http://s87.photobuck...ary/GandL%20SB1[/url]
  4. I can vouch for it, as loud as my GB streamliner
  5. These basses are great indeed (I have a SB4001), really good build quality and playability. GLWTS! P.S. Whilst I am on, please just remember to limit your bumping to once every 36 hours in line with the marketplace guidelines. Thanks!
  6. I hear what you are saying, but it is not a large enough "backbone gap" to be an issue in most situations. I had a Mesa MPulse for many years as well as full Tube amps, they have something extra over the D Class heads, but also and for me more importantly have the extra weight. For me the difference was not big enough not to go D Class. [quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1425813229' post='2710876'] The Streamliner was the best of the micros I tried, but I still thought - in keeping with the others - that it lacked backbone. The Walkabout gives me the tubey tone, and small-ish size, with the heft of a transformer. I've been happy since. [/quote]
  7. I feel like pedal chain order there is no real right or wrong here, so much depends on preference, type of amp, bass etc. Purists may say, you must do X or Y but I say let your ears decide what is best in your setup. Ultimately it is all about being loud enough to keep up with the band, with a tone you like. Marcus Miller and Lemmy have very different sounds.....
  8. [URL=http://s87.photobucket.com/user/welcometombh/media/image.jpg1_zpskvqzapd8.jpg.html][IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k147/welcometombh/image.jpg1_zpskvqzapd8.jpg[/IMG][/URL] My Genz Benz mini stack - picture taken at yesterdays gig. Streamliner 900 2x Focus 210T G&L L2500, Carvin SB4001 and a dirty Les Paul in frame.
  9. I just gigged my Streamliner 900 again yesterday, love it a lot. That said, I have owned and tried a lot of DClass amps now and if the old school vibe is what you are after a Tonehammer or Puma would give you that.
  10. I think we are all underrated to an extent, bass playing is just not as "sexy" in many people's eyes. I have several in mind many already covered in this topic but I nominate Tim Commerford of RATM and Audioslave. With my 90s rock cover band we play a lot of their songs and he just has so many cool lines. And Patrick O'Hearn, great fretless player and my favourite Zappa bass player.
  11. Fender has butchered SWR and Genz Benz and as a result their non tube amps (they already butchered Sunn for more tube tech) have become excellent amps, and at a great price. I have owned an MB 800, it was not for me, but Markbass have a strong following and are great quality as well as cost effective so we will see them around for a long time... Or until Fender takes them over and kills the brand I say Rumble, but best to try both and see for yourself which you prefer. But there are many quality class D amps out there nowadays. My Reidmar continues to impress me, the Puma 900 I had was awesome and the Aggie TH500 is a serious bit of kit too.
  12. A few years ago now, but same great experience. And never, ever been beat since..... But won't trouble you with some of the subsequent bad CS examples by other manufacturers..... mutters Fender....
  13. You are not the only one mate.......
  14. Didn't Thomann stock them? I used to have them on my Jazz, very good flatwounds.
  15. It is the universe mate.....
  16. I have both an STM900 and the Reidmar. Reidmar is clean and focussed, quite modern sounding. STM is valvey, gooey and old school. Different animals. Both loud (Reidmar is incredibly loud for its rating, possible as loud as the STM900) but very different. I am happy I have both but they are 2 sides of the spectrum. [quote name='JapanAxe' timestamp='1425222869' post='2705206'] Ah ok, if I wind up the gain on my Streamliner I can get a bit of breakup (mild distortion) from the preamp valves. Anything like that happen on the Reidmar? (Even if there are no valves on board!) [/quote]
  17. Lovely bass, but outside my price range by a factor of 5. GLWTS!
  18. Sobbing like a little baby...... If only this was a 2025...
  19. Agreed, 500 and change for an American made super PJ is a steal, such an under-appreciated brand. I will take both my L and M2500's over any Stingray any day of the week, this SB will make mince meat out of most Fender Ps, maybe even all.
  20. Caught the little accents nicely matey, well done. The Wick is very well suited for this.
  21. This NUTUBE stuff is intriguing. http://www.korg.com/us/news/2015/012212/ Wonder how long A it will take to make an amp with it, B how long it will take before bass amps are available to test. This would solve all issues (weight) with fulltube amps, IF they indeed sound like tube amps. [quote name='Subthumper' timestamp='1424472662' post='2696832'] No or not that I know of. It takes a lot of energy to reproduce bass frequencies and too small a transformer will result in saturation, which is where the iron core has absorbed as much electromagnetic energy as it can and then starts to distort and lose frequency response. Sometimes this is good thing on guitar amps as is forms part that amps distinct tone. In the early days guitar amps deliberately had small output transformers to limit the low end to preserve the frail speakers. I recently worked on a a couple of peavey 5150/6505 60 watt combos. One was an American one the other was a Chinese one. The output transformer of the Chinese one is about half the size and difference in sound is huge. The U.S. one sounds big and articulate and the Chinese one is rather thin and strangled sounding. Hence this is why all the best sounding valve bass have huge heavy transformers. There is some news on lightweight valves though. Korg have just announced their NUTUBE which is a miniature pre amp valve. Check it out. [/quote]
  22. BC solves yet another conundrum , the power of many.
  23. Found it! http://www.wikizic.org/Vantage-225B1/
×
×
  • Create New...