andydye

[quote name='Musicman20' post='1305236' date='Jul 15 2011, 09:52 PM']I think the '9.0' is meatier came from Genz themselves?! Im sure it did. Whether its just headroom or voicing, the lows on the 9.0 are thicker and fuller, but the 6.0 will get there with tweaks. Then they went all out on the Streamliner and introduced and amp with SO much usable low end, that people are cutting it! The SL900 is a real 'meat and potatoes back to basics' bass amp. Clean tube fatness, but with a sweet high end, (nothing shrill). It sounds massive.[/quote] Streamliner 9 sounds perfect, I really need to get somewhere and try 'em

[quote name='stingrayPete1977' post='1305217' date='Jul 15 2011, 09:40 PM']If I had a pound for pointing out both the 6.0 and 9.0 have exactly the same around 37Hz Shelf with the low button engaged and 80hz shelf without I'd be rich! (well about £8 richer ) This myth started early on when a review stated the 9.0 as 37hz and the 6.0 as 80hz shelved, they can both do either and the internal components are exactly the same the only difference is the final output stage after any sound alterations have been dealt with. Any extra bottom end at regular volumes bearing in mind a 6 with a 4ohm 4x10 or 2x12 is good for a 1000+ venue without PA support I don't see many people having trouble with a 6 or a 9.[/quote] I love a good myth debunking, monster helpful! Thanks matey

[quote name='owen' post='1302639' date='Jul 13 2011, 05:50 PM']Andy, I feel your pain. Auditioning with your eyes instead of your ears as all of us who do not live close to any of the larger music shops is a total lottery. My answer will ultimately be to max out my credit card and order 3 or 4 candidates and mess with them with my own kit and then send all but one back under the distance selling regs which mean you can send anything back within a fortnight.[/quote] Cheeky but I love it!

[quote name='alexclaber' post='1302603' date='Jul 13 2011, 05:09 PM']Any accurately rated 500W amp will have almost as much headroom as an similarly accurately 900W amp! It's less than a 2:1 difference, which is less than 3dB. And when you figure in power compression the difference is even less. For differences in power to be truly significant you have to think in ratios of 3:1 or more. 400W difference is a lot if you're going from 200W to 600W (1:3) but almost nothing if you're going from 1200W to 1600W (3:4). When you're looking at these lightweight bass amps, the amp you like most will be the one that has the right feel for you, which will often be the one that reaches its limit in the way that you most like, and that too will be the amp that you deem loudest. Thus some will deem Markbass amps loudest, some Genz, some TC, etc... No-one's wrong but no-one's right either! [/quote] Eminently good sense as I'm coming to expect from you sir! Thanks again!

[quote name='jimrs2k' post='1302550' date='Jul 13 2011, 04:16 PM']I went for the shuttlemax 9.2 and paired with my fearful 15/6/1 and it the best sounding light weight rig ive ever heard, full stop. As the barefaced cabs are similar i would imagine it to be about the same. for me the the RH 750/450 were too coloured for my taste.[/quote] I think I've whittled it down to the point where it's becoming slight differences of opinion as to what is preferred by the posters (some like TC and some like GB), am definately very incliced towards GB (either Shuttle or Streamliner) and need to try them out! Thanks matey

[quote name='Musicman20' post='1302499' date='Jul 13 2011, 03:43 PM']Ive owned the S 9.0, and the RH450. I currently have the STL900 and the RH750. I can tell you from this experience that the TC RH amps are very very high quality, and the 'tubetone' sounds MUCH more like a real tube amp compared to the S9.0. The 9.0 tube sounded a little fizzy. Weight isnt really a factor when it comes to these amps. However, I found the Shuttle amps to be a bit 'flimsy' because they are SO light, and in fact, I was worried they would fly off the top of my cabinet. Wattage doesnt really come into it as all the manufacturers seem to rate them differently. Markbass 500W amps seem to have almost as much headroom as the Shuttle 9.0 amps...almost. The TC RH amps are VERY loud, and dont sound digital at all. If you want a real tube design in a class D amp, it has to be the Streamliner 900. Higher quality build and slightly high weight compared to the Shuttle series. Very very beefy in the low end, and sweeter highs than the Shuttles. The difference is night and day. The RH750 does everything you could think of...expensive, but a very impressive amp. Loud, light, high quality build, lots of headroom, great tubetone, etc etc.[/quote] Hiya, Life is never as simple at you might hope, I really need to go and try these somewhere, problem is nowehere near me stocks them, it's either London or Coventry! Which is why I asked if anyone had them/had tried them so I could lean on their experience to produce a shortlist... I need to try the Shuttle 6 and 9 and Streamliner 9 and also compare with the TC stuff even though it's more expensive and unlikely to fit my meagre budget... Thanks matey!

[quote name='chris_b' post='1302345' date='Jul 13 2011, 02:03 PM']How did you settle on the STL 9? Have you looked at the Streamliner 900 or the TC RH750? Both would be stiff competition for the STL 9.[/quote] The TC stuff looks a bit plasticky to me and the buttons sound a bit clunky on vids I've seen, the sound (being totally digital) doesn't convince me in the way the Genz stuff does but that's only comparing vid to vid, also features wise I like having real valves... As for the STL9 rather than Streamliner, it looks nicer? I guess it's mostly the features available, the parametric mids rather than preset mid selection are an attractive option to me, I like to be able to select a frequency if I need to, it's also a smidge lighter, I guess there's not really that much in it and it ought to come down to sound but I can't get to anywhere that stocks them to try them out, price wise they're pretty close too.

[quote name='Musicman20' post='1302325' date='Jul 13 2011, 01:47 PM']The DBs can be had for around £400 if you are cheeky. Bass Merchant are the best place for Aguilar...and cheapest.[/quote] oo, I'll have a look! Thanks again

still getting the error...

thus far my dream set-up is looking like... Genz Benz Shuttle 9.0 2x Barefaced Midget-T ...hhmmm just need to sell my Sixpack then

[quote name='Musicman20' post='1301932' date='Jul 13 2011, 09:05 AM']Aguilar DB112?[/quote] Same price as the GS but slightly heavier, JTUK mentioned that range too, there is much to consider! I'm leaning towards Barefaced I think, this is such a minefield!

[quote name='alexclaber' post='1301899' date='Jul 13 2011, 08:06 AM']A few things to point out! The Midget T has a 3" voice coil which means it handles 400W thermally all day long whilst the other cabs have 2.5" voice coils so they're in the 250W area thermally. The Midget T has a stronger magnet so it has greater broadband sensitivity, so it produces greater loudness from a given wattage input, than all the other cabs. The Midget T can move more air than the other cabs because it has more Xmax and greater port area and will handle much more power in the lows (550W) without distortion. Thus two Midgets will produce as much output as three AE112s or UL112s or Neox112s or four GS112s. This ability is borne out by Midgets being used singly in loud rock bands, which is almost unheard of for 1x12" cabs. Unfortunately due to the vastly increased cost of neodymium we're currently applying a £40/woofer surcharge to cover some (nowhere near all!) of this cost increase.[/quote] Thanks for the clarification Alex, I really like the look of your midget cabs and the quality of the feedback given, having looked at your website my only question is...2 midgets or midget + compact? Convenience for me would be 2 midgets so I can use one all the time and keep the other at home for practice and to wheel out or any bigger gigs, does that sound doable?

[quote name='owen' post='1301889' date='Jul 13 2011, 07:46 AM']I have an ACME 12" fullrange on the way in from the US which might well do it for you. Certainly worth throwing into the mix as something to consider.[/quote] Never heard of them, they look fun but I suspect they're near impossible to try before you buy...at least barefaced are a UK builder so there's a possibility of trying first?

[quote name='JTUK' post='1301268' date='Jul 12 2011, 04:42 PM']I am not sure I would say GS112 are not quite full enough and others are.... I wouldn't use just the one for anything but a jazzer gig I suspect that most single 12"'s would have the same limitations and you'd need to pair them as well. Used as a pair, the bottom end is massive and you'll handle a very good low B with defintion and authority at big volume..IF.. the bass is capable of giving that in the first place. That is a BIG IF, as well, IMV..but you can't blame cabs for that. My bass sound is 'lively' compared to a lot of bass sounds so I have to use a horn to get the full range but they don't lack anything, IMV. I prefer the the pair of 2xDB210's myself over 2xGS112's but that is a preference not a flaw, IMO. Our drummer..who is more into metal than I ever will be.. is amazed at the bass end I can put out of 2 tiny GS112's... and his other gigs are all about volume. I would say with these types of cabs..that the size..whilst appealing..has it limitations..but you'll be hard pressed to notice that in a pr of GS112's with a horn, IMO. all bets are off without a horn, IMO.[/quote] I suspect the general use would be single 12 used as on stage monitoring (so nice tight B will be important but massive bass not so) to augment and provide sensation over and above my iem with occasional crazy gigs requiring both cabs so that should work out nicely... I would definately be looking 'mit horn' rather than 'ohne horn' Thanks again for your help matey!