[quote name='ThomBassmonkey' post='1167680' date='Mar 18 2011, 10:37 PM']Machines are so advanced no, they should be able to knock out instruments to a decent quality without having the prices sky high.
IME the price comes from having very high quality control (so you're paying for wastage) or having them hand built (which means better attention to detail, though not specifically anything better overall). Neither make the end instruments better, they just make it less likely you'll get a duff one. Brands like Westfield show that you can make cheap basses that are way above their price point in quality, but dogs can get through the QC.[/quote]
The main difference I'd pay for is having wood that has a specific tonal character. There are far fewer luthiers out there who can guarantee with any certainty what an instrument will sound like than many would have you believe...apart from well worn ash or alder or mahogany bodies are used with maple necks...especially when complicated combinations of wood are being used in one instrument. If anything I've found lots of different woods tend to make the instruments sound more generic. A bit like having too many ingredients in a dish.
I don't think its a question of boutique or not, more a question of construction. Better sounding instruments to my ears tend to have fewer woods used.