Kiwi

we have a couple of members with Kubicki basses, I've only played one once and only briefly at that. I found the controls a little confusing without a layout diagram. BTW I believe you may have missed out one pickup selector setting, I only counted five and remember there being a 'woolly sound'.

[quote name='dannybuoy' post='324593' date='Nov 7 2008, 11:27 PM']It has two, 600 watt power sections. So you can run each "side" at 4 ohms. (quote from the Genz Benz dude at TB forums). The TBers were saying they wanted parametric mids[/quote] Thats definitely an improvement. I think the semi para eq is a good idea as well. It helps deal with dodgy onstage acoustics. [quote name='dannybuoy' post='324593' date='Nov 7 2008, 11:27 PM']and switchable tube/FET channels, it looks like they responded.[/quote] for the love of god why? Are they really going to be able to tell the difference in the middle of the first set?! [quote name='bass_ferret' post='324571' date='Nov 7 2008, 10:57 PM']Not a lot of bass players need two inputs, and there is always an EBS Microbass II if you have to have it. Works very well with my Shuttle.[/quote] Two inputs for those of us who gig with two basses of course. With one input, its too similar to the GBE750. Besides which, with the way that amp is designed, they just need to wire in an extra jack socket from the looks of things. Why pay for an overpriced EBS microbass when a player could get the same functionality in an amp plus 4ohms a side? Question is...how much and, as Bass_ferret pointed out, how does it stack up against the GBE750?

'ave another Son, g'warn, on the 'ouse.

[quote name='Protium' post='324597' date='Nov 7 2008, 11:28 PM']I think it's 250 posts.[/quote] yep, 138 to go mojoke, time for you to assimilate.

hi ade welcome

The one from Live Aid. The sound engineer should hung drawn and quartered. *WARNING* It was a cold day so you might need safety goggles before watching.

Sade is one of those rare ladies who start off jaw droppingly gorgeous, come across as intelligent yet grounded in interviews and 20-odd years later she hasn't aged either... :wub: SIGH :wub:

[quote name='deaver' post='324546' date='Nov 7 2008, 10:07 PM']I love you just the way you are. Was at a wedding featuring two old mates earlier today so i am little tired and emotional. A Bass Chat book might be an idea, along the lines of the Bass Player book maybe[/quote] lol, awwww you ol' softie!

[quote name='alexclaber' post='324419' date='Nov 7 2008, 07:14 PM']Just pointing out that drthirkenstein is quantifiably wrong about low frequency sound pressure levels attainable from certain lightweight neo magnet speaker cabinets - my own design is an obvious example for which I know the precise performance and am 100% certain that you cannot buy any other bass guitar cabinet of similar size (not weight!) which can produce as much LF SPL. If he said he didn't like the sound of them then fair enough! Alex[/quote] Yeah but because you made specific reference to your product its a plug too. Tut.

[quote name='wateroftyne' post='324538' date='Nov 7 2008, 09:55 PM']I think a ban on people who think there should be a ban on cat pics should be implemented, punishable by Sandy Toksvig in a leotard.[/quote] Mike, you say that like Sandy Toksvig is a bad thing.

With a single input and FET/Tube channel switching I'm not interested. That may be what guitarists like but it's probably not what most bass players really need. If it was 2 independent channels with two inputs and went to 2 ohms I would be VERY interested.

Judging by the photo, your other half is a bit of a looker too. Well done on both fronts, son.

not so long ago you could pick one up for about £250, if they're selling for £500 thats a hell of an investment!

Its all really interesting stuff guys! Thanks for the inputs so far. I hope it keeps coming.

Just so everyone is aware, the problems with the poll before were because the poll didn't let you answer only one question and then vote. Everyone has to answer all three questions before posting their vote. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I didn't realise this so I've added null categories to the last two questions as well.

Ped and I have been blatting back and forth ideas for how to develop the forum for quite a while now. The dilemna for us is that whatever we do, we would like the site to continue to grow. However, with the number of forums and the amount of opportunity there is for making the site more useful and easier, the off-the-shelf forum software becomes a little limiting because its not designed to be tailored much. It's designed for ease of management. It's possible we could potentially look at developing bespoke forum software if there was a way to tailor the site more specifically for the way in which its used by the members. However, obviously before any of this stuff is considered feasible, we need to test our assumptions about what would be valued by members and whether its worth doing it anyway. I know some of you will think 'whats wrong with the forum the way it is now'. Fair enough, thats why I've put a poll together. The core areas of interest that Ped and I see the site having for everyone are (in no particular order) 1) Socialising 2) Information 3) Promotion (Have I missed anything out?) There are some parts of the forum, such as the Off Topic that appears to fill the social networking side of things. Its possible, for example, that we could look at enhancing the site so that it had some features similar to Facebook/Myspace. Perhaps each member could be offered a more sophisticated profile page with enhanced features eg. media streaming, status updates from friends, photo album, band pages etc. There are some parts of the forum such as the Affiliates forum that caters for the promotional side of things, which we could potentially turn into more of a shop front. Similar to some of the online retailers such as Thomann. This would be contained under a completely separate section but it would be relatively easy to track orders etc. It would offer any members with commercial interests, but not enough expertise or time to set up their own web-based shop front, a way of getting a web presence for their products. In terms of information, the wiki is consistently underutilised by members but still provides a potentially valuable repository of collected wisdom. It would be nice to integrate that more successfully within the forum. OK. The reality is that, if this were to go ahead, unless we have a member within the community who would be prepared to help us develop the site for low upfront cost, then obviously someone is going to want to be paid for their time in programming new forum software. So the $64.000 questions are would you all, as members, be prepared to pay a yearly subscription for enhanced usefulness? If you didn't want to pay for it but still wanted the features, would you be prepared to tolerate additional advertising? There is the potential for us to approach a company I know of who would offer to cover the development costs in exchange for a share of the promotional revenue (I guess its a bit like a record company deal). NB: Just to make it clear - THERE ARE NO DEFINITE PLANS TO CHANGE THE FORUM. We just want to put out a feeler to see what people think about the potential on offer.

welcome mate, show us ya growler?

I'd better check my email box as well, looks like he sent a flurry out this evening. EDIT: nope I feel rejected.

all the F-basses I've tried have sounded even better than they've looked.

[quote name='ARGH' post='323779' date='Nov 6 2008, 10:12 PM']Well,not my opinon...but the Opinion of Spectors company and its associates,enough to warrent legal terms and thus the said deal,as reported in Bassplayer magazine,sometime in the 90s..If I recall correctly its was Spectors daughter that broke the news of the deal....the likeness was a little too close iirc.[/quote] OK, I'm interested to know why they didn't press ahead with legal action. Maybe they didn't register the body shape as a trademark outside the US perhaps. Still, a lot of it goes on.