-
Posts
20,283 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by BigRedX
-
Looking at the photographs again it strikes me that because of the fan-frets the Dingwall has worse upper range access than the original...
-
[quote name='Muzz' timestamp='1457430313' post='2998349'] Don't ask me, mate, I just play it... Hammered wedding punters love it, though: there's unseemly jumping around and a lot of fun had by the crowd. Every single time... I've very very very rarely seen an originals band (present company excluded, natch ) play to that kind of reaction in a similar-sized venue... It is out of all proportion to the song, though: it's got a big chorus, but so have zillions of other songs... [/quote] I don't play it. I only knowingly heard it for the first time the other week. Even in my relatively brief stint of being in a covers band the question of playing "Sex On Fire" never came up. However we did play "I Predict A Riot" to which I had a similar reaction, although I quite liked the baseline in the verse on that. And I don't think the chorus on "Sex On Fire" is that big. On the whole the song doesn't seem to really get going until just before the end.
-
Not wanting to high-jack the thread but can someone please tell me what is so special about "Sex On Fire"? TBH I'm not really a Kings Of Leon fan. Their earlier songs were OK if nothing particularly special, but a photo of them in a music mag sporting ridiculous beards pretty much put me off investigating any further. A couple of weeks ago my girlfriend was playing their "Only By The Night" album in the car, and I got to hear Sex On Fire properly for the first time. I really don't get it. It's not the best track on the album by a long shot and not helped by the fact that the two tracks before it are far stronger songs, in terms of tunes, riff and general anthemic qualities. So what's the big deal? Why is a fairly mediocre song by a mediocre band such a crowd pleaser?
-
[quote name='EBS_freak' timestamp='1457427883' post='2998294'] Headstock proportion is still not right - matched headstock would be preferable too as you say imho. [/quote] I'd want the back of neck to be the same colour as the body - and fingerboard in wood that compliments that colour. Just having a matching headstock is completely half-arsed. IMO natural finished neck unless it's attached to a matching natural body makes the whole bass look cheap.
-
For an originals band I'd be looking to find a songwriting partner first, so probably a singer or perhaps a guitarist. IME it's a lot easier to recruit other musicians if you have a definite musical direction and a bunch of songs already written. For covers I would want to join an existing band that needed a bass player.
-
[quote name='EBS_freak' timestamp='1457400811' post='2998211'] The Dingwall Thunderbird. Headstock fail. [/quote] I don't have a problem with it. The fact that the neck and headstock aren't the same colour as the body and the super-tacky looking wooden scratch plate are far worse aesthetic faux-pas IMO.
-
IME slipping tuners are due to the bearings for the worm gear having worn out and not holding the two gears tight enough together. And I've never seen this on anything other than very old open style mechanisms. AFAIK the tension adjustment on modern tuners simply adjusts how hard (or not) it is to turn the worm gear and nothing else. To the OP are you sure the problem is the tuners? can you see the string post actually turning back when under string tension?
-
[quote name='thebassist' timestamp='1457389581' post='2998145'] There is no point, I'm just saying. [/quote] No point in what? What are you saying?
-
Unfortunately there's plenty of time wasters in all the corners of the internet. And that's because it's simply too easy to place or respond to an ad on those sites. Before all these join my band type web sites, if you wanted to be in a band, you had to make the journey into town and visit your local music shop (or hip record shop if they did band ads) scour the ads board and write down the contact details from any ad that looked interesting. Then you actually had to phone them up and talk to the person who placed the ad. Alternatively you could spend an hour going through the ads in the classified section of Melody Maker If you were actually looking for band members then putting an ad together and getting it up on the notice boards or paying for it to be in the music press was another level of commitment.
-
[quote name='EmmettC' timestamp='1457388172' post='2998123'] Nice, that definitely suits the image of your band, I still haven't found a bass I like that visually suits my alter-ego in my industrial band Metaltech. If I could find a nice 5 string Iceman with a full size body....... [/quote] Born To Rock F4B? [IMG]http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n249/BigRedX/DSC02174-1_zps72ba13f8.jpg[/IMG]
-
[quote name='EmmettC' timestamp='1457269325' post='2996852'] Sorry to dig up an old thread, I was just wondering about Foderas and came across this, so when there's guys selling Stingrays for £700 in the marketplace and Maruszczyk are putting out amazing customs below £1000 why do people buy Foderas? Is anyone using a Fodera at a paid gig, like theatre work or functions? I'm not against custom basses, but I play in a function band so my Sandberg and Musicman seem perfect for me, so I'm really interested to see if any other working musicians are using really expensive or custom stuff. [/quote] Do I count as a working musician? My band do about 40 paying gigs a year playing our own material and have just released our first full-length album which is currently getting airplay on 6 Music. If so... [IMG]http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n249/BigRedX/BigRedX.jpg[/IMG] That's a Gus G3 5-string. Last time I asked - about 5 years ago - a new one to the same specification would have set you back just over £5k. I bought it because it's a fantastic looking, sounding and playing bass. Stingrays and Maruszczyk might be far more affordable but they simply don't do anything for me and I find Fender basses and their copies awkward and uncomfortable to play.
-
Way over-optimistic price considering the condition, and not even the added John Birch pickup makes up for that.
-
[quote name='CamdenRob' timestamp='1457363261' post='2997758'] I've walked miles around London with my bass in an M80... It's very comfortable to carry and my basses are seriously heavy. Only slight issue is that it sticks up a bit too high and you have to be careful getting on buses etc. [/quote] I have the opposite problem. Because I'm not very tall the bottom edge of the case slaps against the backs of my thighs as I walk. Also for me the top anchor points of the straps are too close together which tends to push the case down my back and exaggerates the problem. Personally I wouldn't buy another expensive gig bag (more than £40) without trying out it for a good 10 minute walk with my bass in it first.
-
Has anyone seen the Bigsby-equiped version in the flesh?
-
Right case for the right situation. A cheap gig bag isn't much good if you need to load your bass into the back of the van. On the other hand I wouldn't want to walk half an hour to the rehearsal rooms with a flight case. Also IME all the decent semi-rigid gig bags take up as much room as a Hiscox case and some of them are almost as heavy. I own a Mono M80 and although it offers a good level of protection to the bass inside, IMO it is uncomfortable to wear while walking for more than a few minutes and therefore doesn't get very much use. I have a selection of suitable hard cases and comfortable gig bags to fit all my basses and these get used as appropriate instead.
-
[quote name='fretmeister' timestamp='1457350677' post='2997539'] The fan fret design belongs to Novax. They licence it to others. [/quote] IIRC the Novax Fan-fret patent has now expired so anyone can make a fan fret instrument without needing to licence it.
-
As others have said, if you are having fun playing music and being in a band then you are already way ahead of those people who can only dream about having learnt to play instrument. On the other hand although getting the "breaks" in music is largely a matter of luck I find that to a great degree you have to make your own luck. I think an awful lot of musicians are under the false impression that being technically competent at their chosen instrument is all they need, when in fact it may well be the least important thing when it comes to getting those important gigs or making a record. Yes there is an element of having to be in the right place at the right time, but the more you/your band are out there the more chances you get. The various bands I've been in over the last 40 years have had a modicum of success. Nothing truly massive but enough to keep me plugging away at it and also enough to know that all my "luck" has been backed up with an enormous amount of hard work behind the scenes to make those important gigs and record releases happen. And TBH putting out an album is not that big a deal any more. Since the mid 70s anyone with sufficient cash and the necessary drive can do it. And these days all it takes, if you are happy with a digital release only, is a recording and £50. The true test is being able to get someone outside of the band to pay for it all - and then of course to actually sell some copies!
-
[quote name='PaulWarning' timestamp='1457259531' post='2996714'] bit harsh there BigRed, nothing wrong with the first record, it's the second one that's the trouble, so any easy one to make a single album from, Armegideon time isn't on my version of London Calling btw [/quote] But IMO fair. I was a massive Clash fan based on their first two albums, but was so underwhelmed by London Calling. At the time of its release I really liked the single and then that was about it. I recently revisited it as my musical tastes have somewhat broadened in the past 30 or so years and found that I now like "Lost In The Supermarket" as well. And yes I know "Armegideon Time" isn't on the album, but in light of the weakness of the other material it really should have been there and not relegated to the B-side of the single.
-
Two caveats I would add to my answers. My spend on accessories is as and when I need to. Some years it's a lot others it's nothing. Buying a solution mention in the last question will very much depend on how useful it is to me. I have eliminated most of my equipment problems by having my amp and effects rack mounted into a single case.
-
Double Albums That Work and the One That Don't
BigRedX replied to spectoremg's topic in General Discussion
The only double album I can't think off that doesn't need to have some pruning done to it is "Tommy" by The Who. -
In the 80s my synth band used to cover "This Town Ain't Big Enough For The Both Of Us" It seems pretty straight-forward until you need to break it down in order to program the drums when it becomes apparent that the whole song is built entirely around the main riff and to fit the vocal line without any regard to making all the bars 4 beats long. Genius stuff.
-
The Clash - "London Calling" could be re-released as an EP: 1. London Calling 2. Lost In The Supermarket 3. Armegideon Time
-
That is almost a second hand price - IIRC they were over £500 new. There's one for £350 on eBay ATM.
-
[url=http://www.gear4music.com/Guitar-and-Bass/DISC-Epiphone-Thunderbird-PRO-V-Bass-5-string-Trans-Black/AYE]Gear4Music have a new PRO-V for sale at £399[/url] I tried one when they first came out as I really like the look and I'm a strictly 5-string player. Unfortunately I was completely underwhelmed by it. The pre-amp is a nasty cheap thing that you would normally find in an entry-level active bass and the whole instrument felt clumsy and awkward with none of the elegance of a 60s Gibson. I couldn't in all honesty recommend it to anyone who hasn't tried it for themselves first and liked it.
-
Which one is the best depends entirely on what you want out of a bass. IMO none of the Epiphone models (or even the current Gibson ones for that matter) have much to do with the original 1960s Gibson Thunderbird other than the name and the general body shape. There are 3 different Epiphone Thunderbirds all with different woods, construction and electronics so take your pick: The Epiphone Classic-IV PRO is the closest to the current Gibson version, although I don't think that means very much. The Epiphone PRO-IV used to also come in a 5-string version although AFAICS it has now been discontinued. You'll probably need to find one second hand if you really want a 5-string. Apart from the through neck this has the smallest amount of "original" Thunderbird features and has active electronics. The Epiphone Thunderbird-IV superficially looks like the real thing but it has different pickups and a bolt-on neck, however if you are Fender player you may actually prefer the feel and sound of this model. The only real way to find out is to go and try them all for yourself.