BigRedX

[quote name='mentalextra' timestamp='1457022333' post='2994573'] Although [i]Sparks[/i] were/are not my 'thing', I was interested to read about how apparently, when they moved to the UK and hired a bass player, with a distinctive 'rick' type sound, and he wouldn't change his tone when they went all 'disco', that he lost the gig? I know that the BC collective is a mine of information and I'm interested to know if the story is true? [/quote] Looks like that story is complete bollocks. From the band line-ups from there were 4 different bass players on the 5 albums from "Kimono My House" to last before they made before "No 1 in Heaven".

All his devices need to be sync'd together. Probably using MIDI clock or even better MTC. One device needs to be the master tempo source and all the others slaved from that. If he'd just letting them all run independently of each other and hoping that they will all stay in sync then he's on to a losing battle. Also bear in mind that not all iPad apps are capable of outputting or responding to clock information. To help further we'll need a lot more information like what apps he is running on the tablet and Mac and what versions of the OS they are running under. What interfaces he has on each device and how they are all connected together. Then it might be possible sort out what is going wrong and how to make it work if possible.

The Thompson Twins' "Love On Your Side" has a line that goes "I played you all my favourite records…" which is followed by the main keyboard riff from their earlier single "In The Name Of Love".

"Rip It Up" by Orange Juice references "Boredom" by The Buzzcocks not only in the lyric but also in the the guitar part that follows.

[quote name='cocco' timestamp='1456993110' post='2994219'] That's gorgeous, But what was wrong with Pelham Blue? [/quote] Pelham blue is pretty nasty IMO. Although not as nasty as "Sonic" Blue - probably the least sonic shade of blue I could imagine!

[quote name='TrevorR' timestamp='1456988110' post='2994189'] Wow, so did BC get threatened or have an injunction slapped on for passing on and/or trading/abetting the trade of counterfeit goods? [/quote] IIRC there used to be a pinned thread about it in "Off-Topic". The general gist of the matter was that RIC were unhappy about Basschat being used to advertise Rickenbacker copies for sale either in the sales forums or by providing links to instruments for sale elsewhere on the internet. Despite the fact that their claims probably have little legal standing in the UK, Baschat relies on plenty of 3rd party suppliers from other countries including the US for its functionality, and RIC could make life very difficult for the forum if it really wanted to. The outcome was that all sales and mentions of sales elsewhere of Rickenbacker shaped instruments - real or copies - has been banned on Basschat, as it is the simplest way of ensuring that the forum does not upset RIC. Anything else was deemed to complicated and time-consuming to police by the Basschat moderators.

[quote name='Twincam' timestamp='1456993190' post='2994220'] Never thought about this but do I need to get my te combo pat tested to take it to rehearsal rooms and such like? [/quote] If you've seen the state of most of the gear in the average rehearsal room you wouldn't need to be asking this question! ;-)

Illustrator is obviously the professionals choice for this (although you may find that you need Photoshop too depending on what graphical effects you want), but it's not particularly cheap. However if you Mac is sufficiently old enough to run OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard you might be able to make use of the free version of Creative Suite 2 which includes both Illustrator and Photoshop. Be warned that this version was pretty buggy under OS X 10.4 and I can't imagine that it will be any more stable under a newer OS. Otherwise if you think you can master the program enough to do all your work in a month you could download the trial version of Illustrator CC 2015 and use it until it expires. Inkscape looks as though it might be suitable and as it's free you don't really have anything to loose except time if you want to try it. If you want to incorporate and manipulate your conventional score items you will need to be able to export them as either .eps or editable .pdf files.

[quote name='Greg.Bassman' timestamp='1456795749' post='2992379'] Hi all. I'm on the market for a gated (synthy) fuzz that works well with active basses. When I was a passive man, my weapon of choice used to be the Zvex Woolly Mammoth; however, it's become common knowledge that they don't work so well with active circuitry. I've found this to be true [i]and[/i] false; the tone is still great, but the 'pinch' (gate control) doesn't appear to be effective anymore. Any recommendations? Cheers. [/quote] Why doesn't the Zvex Woolly Mammoth work properly with active basses?

Using an external photo host such as Photobucket is a much better idea since it allows you to show far bigger photographs which are far more useful when it comes to selling gear. For some reason the Baschat uploader reduces the size of everything so that you end up with tiny images that don't show of what you are trying to sell in the best light.

[quote name='TimR' timestamp='1456844579' post='2992822'] The fonts are held in the Font Book. Otherwise open your word processor and look through the installed fonts. You should be able to just type the symbols into the word processor and cut and paste. [/quote] People actually use Font Book? The quickest and easiest way to all the glyphs (charters) in a font is to install the character viewer. Apple Menu > System Preferences> Language & Text > Input Sources. Then check Keyboard and Character Viewer which will be at the top of the list above all the different language options. This will but an icon in your menu bar to the left of the time from which you can select Keyboard viewer to give a floating palette showing all the available glyphs.

TBH I don't think there's going to be any one program that is going to be able to create what you want. The problem is that there doesn't appear to be any "standard" way of displaying non-standard musical instructions. The links that others have provided are either standard notation applications or programs for turning coded instructions into sound. Whereas AFAICS what you want is some way of easily taking your visual ideas and combining them with conventional musical notation to produce a score that can be interpreted by musicians to create a piece of music? Also from my brief look on the internet at composers who produce scores like this it is obvious that they do so because they have a background in visual as well as musical arts and are often just as accomplished in them as they are in musical composition. If graphics and art are not your strong points (as it appears from your OP) then your are left with two choices. Either get practicing in order to develop and refine your graphical skill; or find another way of presenting your musical ideas. After all isn't that the point of the course?

In normal situations I'm a bit lacking in the social skills department, but with the right musicians I can get on with them easily and have lots to talk about. And finding the right musicians is what this is all about. Don't worry about gear. Away from Basschat no-one really cares what you have, so long as you can play it sufficiently well to do the music you want and it works reliably.

[quote name='ambient' timestamp='1456796334' post='2992380'] What software could do something this, could you do it in Word ? Only my handwriting/drawing is awful. [/quote] Word is essentially a glorified type-writer. While it might be possible to do, you'd probably spend as long (if not longer) trying to learn how to achieve this as you would actually doing it. You need to right tools to do the job properly but you also need the right skills to use them (a bit like music really). If I was looking to create something like this I'd probably be looking at a combination of Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign as well as a more traditional notation program, together with a Wacom Cintiq for getting it all onto the computer in the first place, but then, I've already go the tools and the know-how to use them, so I'm not going to be taking a lot of time to learn a whole new set of skills. There seems to be a lot of misconceptions about computer programs for graphics and an incorrect assumption that just owning one will automatically give you all the skills you need. No-one here would assume that owning a DAW automatically makes you an ace composer or producer, so why would graphics be any different? Which brings me on to: [quote name='Dad3353' timestamp='1456799490' post='2992384'] Do as [i]they [/i]do; pencil and paper, I'd say. Just get a roll of ceiling wallpaper (is that a contradiction in terms..? ) and fill it up. In a century or so, those scrolls will be auctioned off for oodles of [insert your favourite predicted currency here ...]. [/quote] And TBH this is still the way I'd do it. The computer is great for getting things neat and accurate, but the roughness and hand-drawn look is what makes the images you posted originally so compelling. And be creating a true "original" you also create extra value to you score should you ever become well-known enough as a composer. You can't replicate the uniqueness of the one-off original manuscript with a computer file. Also even if I was to go with the software approach I'd still be starting with something hand drawn on paper which I would then scan in to use as a template. Again it's a question of using the right tools for the job. [quote name='ambient' timestamp='1456829929' post='2992564'] Thanks ��. It's for part of my MMus portfolio, so needs to be neat ��. [/quote] Does it really have to be neat? I'm sure the composer(s?) of the manuscripts you posted originally would have something to say about that. Of course it depends on what you are actually going to produce. IMO so long as what you produce is legible and understandable by the musicians who are expected to perform the music from your score, then it is neat enough. EDIT: If I didn't already have the skills and tools to do this on the computer, I'd be investing my time an energy in improving my basic drawing and penmanship using pens and paper.

[quote name='karlfer' timestamp='1456822875' post='2992462'] I've done some to Europe. I stipulate to them, 1. They need to pay me by bank transfer. They need to know sometimes this will take 3 days to clear. 2. After funds have cleared, THEY need to organise and pay for INSURED courier, simply telling me what day the courier will collect. In the rare event something goes wrong with a courier, well, if worst comes to worst in UK, I can get in the car, drive to the firms HO and eyeball the gaffer. I can not do that in Europe. I stipulate the above for fairness to both parties. It has cost me sales, but it's the only way I will do it after a couple of expensive and worrying nightmares. NEVER PAINPal! [/quote] As a buyer I would probably walk away from any deal requiring me to organise the courier, not because it is difficult, but because IME it's the easiest part of the process and because I am then responsible for the delivery but have no actual control over how the bass is being packaged. Lose-lose all round IMO. Also the one time I have allowed a buyer to organise their own delivery for an item going to Hungary, the courier who turned up was the Hungarian equivalent of a man with a (Hungarian) van. Luckily it wasn't a very expensive item so I was prepared to take the risk and lose money if it went wrong (it didn't), but there would have been no "Gaffer to eyeball" if there was a problem unless I was prepared to take a trip to the continent.

You don't need to worry about using PayPal provided you use a decent courier where the same company does all parts of the transit process. That immediately rules out any postal service options, where delivery will be handed over to one of their "partners" once the parcel leaves the country. That way you have a single "paper trail" of the parcel's journey and a single company that is accountable. This means using one of the big well-known international companies such as UPS or FedEx. I usually use UPS booked through Interparcel, as all parts of the collection and delivery are handled by UPS (however check before you send as it may not be true for every country - you can do this by clicking on the ? icon on the Interparcel page which will show if any part of the transit process is being handled by another company like some of the cheaper TNT options). The other important things to do are to pack the bass properly. That means the bass really ought to go in a hard case with plenty of padding inside and then the case should then be wrapped in bubble wrap before being boxed in a strong cardboard box. Cut down bicycle boxes make excellent containers and generally are far more robust than the average guitar packing box. If you don't have a hard case then double-box the bass. That means put it in a smaller cardboard box first before bubble wrapping and packing in a larger one as before. If you need to make an insurance claim for damage, the packing is the first thing the courier company will look at, so make sure that it is more than just adequate. In fact if the hard case is an important part of the deal then I would suggest double boxing the case with the bass inside! I've had to use Interparcel's insurance claims service twice - once for damage and once for the loss of a parcel (neither were musical instruments or particularly expensive - both under £200). They paid promptly and without fuss on each occasion, but with the damage claim they insisted on seeing photos showing exactly how the item had been packaged and that the packaging had been sufficient by their standards (which are on the Interparcel website) before paying out.

[quote name='Dad3353' timestamp='1456774138' post='2992182'] Indolent so-and-so that I am, I copy the Imgur link, then paste that, as is, directly into the text box. Other OS may be different, of course, but the less I mess about with codes and stuff, the better I feel (done it for too many years, now... ). The icône to the left of the Imgur code field even does the copying for me, so it's all win. [/quote] The whole point of modern forum software is so people don't have to bother messing around with code - even the relatively simple IP Board tags. However it's always useful to be able to look "under the hood" and understand what is going on when things don't work as expected.

It looks like we have a result!

[quote name='Big_Stu' timestamp='1456773681' post='2992177'] Interesting......... I can't replicate that & get a result! [/quote] Have a look at my reply above. Check your code by clicking the light switch icon top left in the reply window which stops the Forum from trying to parse the code and shows what has actually been typed/copied/automatically generated.

Right. I think I've worked out what the problem is. It appears HJH is using the correct link but then placing it in Basschat with the image button effectively wrapping it in 2 sets of IMG tags: [code]" class="ipsImage" /> Nope. Doesn't like Imgur either.[/code] If the link you copy from your photo-hosting site already contains the IMG tag you can paste it into the reply directly without having to use the image button. HTH. Edit: it would help if I actually could type the right tags myself!

[quote name='Big_Stu' timestamp='1456773058' post='2992163'] Edit: Looks like a similar route to BRX. [/quote] No mine is exactly what HJH was trying to do except that I accessed the photo URL directly and then made my own IMG tags in the Basschat reply.

Very weird. The only way I could make the image actually display in the forum properly was to copy the URL from between the IMG tags into the address field of a new browser window and then copy the address again into the reply field in Basschat with my own IMG tags that I typed myself.

I think the problem might be with the way the code is being entered into the Basschat reply field. If I go to that Imgur link and make my own IMG tags the photo appears OK (in the preview window at least). If I try to quote your Imgur post the code appears to be broken - the opening IMG tag is lost, but then the photo appears after quote. Like this: [quote name='hiram.k.hackenbacker' timestamp='1456772280' post='2992146'] " class="ipsImage" /> Nope. Doesn't like Imgur either. [/quote]

[quote name='hiram.k.hackenbacker' timestamp='1456771738' post='2992134'] Yes, exactly that and it will not work for me. Just doesn't copy the link form where it used to on my old PC (exactly where you have circled). [/quote] That's because your new Mac doesn't have Flash installed. There's a little .swf (Flash) element on the page that automatically copies the contents of the link field that you click on, into the clipboard of your computer. IIRC without Flash installed you can't even select the link let alone copy it. I always copy my links from the thumbnail view in the album, which doesn't rely on having Flash but you do have to manually copy the code (either using command-c or from the edit menu). I don't worry about the link giving away my album, because I have a separate Photobucket account just for use with Basschat.