I appreciate that you don't remember the details; most wouldn't, and only a few would.
Personally, in this case I'd remember some details, but probably not all.
Still, I guess I must've worded my post poorly, so I'll try to reword:
A BC owner told BC readers about his experiences as a member of the audience at the name person's stand-up gig.
That name person somehow learned about this and started threatening BC with a court case. Owners told us the very existence of BC was under threat.
Trying to be in BC's corner, I asked my questions, and, instead of answering the questions, that person tried and partially succeeded in making me look like the bad person.
Some people on BC thanked me profusely; others started the blaming and the namecalling.
Since, every now and then someone refers to me as a bully or as the one who "has hounded off" said person.
I've kept silent after BC owners asked me to.
I think there was no "hounding off", and if there was a bully, it was not me.
Instead, I think I was someone attempting to help BC remain in existence, by asking three simple questions.
The relevance of something said at a stand-up performance exists (solely?) in that the story was told on BC by one of its owners, and the name person then threatened to drag BC to court.
I think there was no subject matter of people trying to treat said person badly over his reported racial stereotyping or over musical choices he may have made. I at least have not seen such treating him badly. On the contrary, I saw people submissively treat him like someone on another, higher, level.
The subject matter as far as I could see it was only his threatening BC with a court case.