Jump to content
Why become a member? ร—

BassTractor

โญSupporting Memberโญ
  • Posts

    5,905
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by BassTractor

  1. Googling and googling, I found the same question on TalkBass, and there they didn't solve it. When I started this thread, I though it was a well-known bass and therefore easy, but now it seems to me this isn't easy at all. So I think it's not worth the energy, and that it's best to put this at rest. Thanks again, everyone! Bert (However, for those who love stuff like this and who are not gonna be stopped, let me try in different words: Basically, it's a Thunderbird shape. No Non Reverse, no other things that make it weirder or more regular. However, if you can see the Thunderbird as basically a bendy parallellogram, then this bass still is a bendy parallellogram but less pointy. As a result its body probably is wider, or seems wider. Neck has large inlays (though that may have been an artefact of the resolution). One-part bridge near end of body. It looked rectangular and chromey. Two single-coil pups, or pups that look like them. I saw no scratchplate, but it may have been there Headstock not seen.)
  2. Love them, me, and have done so since the early 70s - a period when we could just walk into our local music shop and try and buy Renaissance instrument copies. What a wonderful time! Based on my experience with the viola da gamba, I'd say: "Do it! Do it!" ๐Ÿ™‚
  3. Thanks, guys! As to @EssentialTension's Stormbird and @Chiliwailer's Non Reverse T-bird, I'd seen those earlier and then thought to myself that if they had had the typical Thunderbird non-reversed reversed non-reversedreversedness, they could be rather close. The Cataldo too is close, but in my eye somewhat closer to a T-Bird again. In the mean time, I've been trying to find the tv-programme online for a screenshot. Will keep you updated. Thanks!
  4. Thanks, folks! None of those I'm afraid. Think of it as a bass that you immediately think is a Thunderbird, and then, milliseconds later, you realise it's a copy that tried to be just different enough. It's slightly in the direction of a rectangle - with for example a lesser pronounced lower horn than a real Thunderbird. I think it existed in the seventies, but as my memory is lacking I cannot be sure. In case I think eighties is a fair guess. In the mean time, I've done some more googling, and the Schecter Sixx Bass comes very close, see below, without being exactly the one I saw on tv, which seems slightly closer to a rectangle again and which had pronounced inlays in the neck. Again, this is not important stuff. I'm just interested. Thanks again!
  5. Today a bass (I think) was almost seen on tv that I remember from days long gone, and it was obviously like a Thunderbird, but made so as to discern it from it, making for a more modest, more rectangular-like shape. Anyone any idea what it could have been? It's not an important question, but I'm trying to build up my memory again.
  6. I was saddened reading this. Also, it's so unnecessary! In my book, you still look like Donny Osmond! ๐Ÿ™‚ (That said, these days Donny Osmond sadly looks a lot worse than even Barry off EastEnders.) ๐Ÿ˜
  7. Methinks its about time you othah numbskull's started to respec my noledges. It's diving! Scooby diving! (OK then: AKA Scubaru)
  8. I think you misunderstand. He meant diving. ๐Ÿ˜
  9. They were great musicians though, and IMHO had many very well made songs. Also, Jan Akkerman could improvise with relevance to the song in question - nearly as if the improvisation was composed.
  10. Aye. I've been confronted with that trick several times as a seller, even without the need for a physical return. These blokes (always blokes) would inform me beforehand they wanted the invoice for the cheap item (paid with bank card) and didn't need the invoice for the expensive item minus the return of the cheap item (paid in cash). Whilst I'm not in favour of cheating one's better half, I feel like defending some of these guys a bit - in some cases: some better halves are just terrible, and one tends to try and survive and compromise etc for some time - - especially when one had kids. Been there, done that (not the cheating bit) when I needed musical instruments to simply get bread on the table at all.
  11. I knoooow.... and it also reminds me of the story of my friends - classical musicians - who went to the sauna and talked about music together. Some bloke there started chatting with them: "You're musicians, aren't you? So am I." My friend asked about what he was, and who, upon which he replied: "I'm in Focus. I'm Jan Akkerman." My friend: "Never heard of." Jan Akkerman: "๐Ÿ˜’" ๐Ÿ˜
  12. The new job was just depping with some guys I knew and some guys I didn't know. So far so good. One of the lads had brought his granddad, who seemed a nice enough and modest man when we were having a coffee before the rehearsal. To my surprise (and admittedly slight annoyance) granddad decided to follow us into the rehearsal room and get seated just behind where I was to play the piano. He didn't do anything wrong, mind, but I just didn't feel it was the done thing. OK, so the rehearsal proceeds and after some time I hear a sound from behind me. Looking half over my shoulder I see that granddad produces a little harmonica and starts blowing into it. My OMFG annoyance doesn't get to develop to its maximum before I recognise timbre as well as style: OMFG! I'm playing with Toots Thielemans!... ๐Ÿ˜‚
  13. Didn't see this one coming. Nice though:
  14. They rolled it from Gdynia to Gdansk, saving a lot of man hours that way. Fact.
  15. Was gonna say my 1988 Yamaha TX802 synth box and other similar items, but the thread taught me to think outside the module, so... My school days recorder and my ca. 1970 flute. Used the flute just a few days ago, so I think that counts.
  16. You're lucky. I've done some more digging, and... her name is Gerald.
  17. Story of my life. - What? Another 65-stop pipe organ? - No, love, just one that had some fret work done. Great craftsmanship! Fast turnaround!" - ...
  18. I have to rectify something. In a now edited post I said Kaspersky were dodgy from the start. They may well have been, but I wouldn't know. See, I've just found out I was instead thinking of a Norwegian company with a similar Russian-sounding name. Sorry for any possible concerns.
  19. Exactly, and that's where the concern lies. (BTW, I wrote encryption software myself and am too aware of what software developers can do.) Thanks for a good post though, and for the tip on the offline managers.
  20. We will never reveal how we managed to film you through the thick stripe of insulation tape over your laptop's webcam. ๐Ÿ˜ˆ BTW the script thing seems to be a thing of the past due to better protection these days, but it might come back, so I routinely switch off any preview window. Password managers concern me though. My daughter swears by one and it's Russian. Who is to say it's not the Russian mafia acting as the good guys for some time before getting nasty? I don't know the answer to this, but don't take the (imagined) risk. As a result I have all my passwords (different for each site) in an encrypted file on a memory stick. There must be vulnerabilities in my approach too, but I feel I'm doing what I can.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...