-
Posts
7,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by dannybuoy
-
Set the EQ flat, attack switch on, gain around 25%, volume set so it's even no mattter where the blend is set, and blend set around 65%. Add an additional LPF module or speaker sim to get rid of the fizzier treble if going FRFR. I also boost my high mids but that's because my bass is passive and my strings usually pretty dead! And try it in a mix before making a full judgement - it's sonic signature is a fairly extreme mid cut around 500Hz, but the attack switch boosts around 1-1.5KHz, I find it leaves a nice hole for crunchy guitars and male vocals while still cutting through.
-
You can get closer to an OC-2 using one of the other random effects that's not even an octaver, pitchringmod or something. I did post the settings elsewhere a long time ago! Is that a new Mutron model? I wasn't blown away by the filters when I last dipped my toes in, but a decent Mutron would probably seal the deal for me!
-
Crossover points sound good to me! Don't confuse this with a speaker protection HPF like the Thumpinator, the HPF here only affects the high channel. You could rightly want a 30Hz HPF on the low channel, but that's not where the HPF is in the signal chain. The HPF just affects the highs going into the distortion and the LPF just affects the lows going into the compressor, both sides run in parallel like the DP3-X. You really don't want anything under 100Hz going to the distortion here, the other channel is taking care of the clean low end. Setting the HPF to 1KHz would be similar to the DP3-X which is fixed at 1.2KHz. Setting it to 500 or 100 would let you have more fullrange distortion without the big hole in the midrange that the DP3-X has. The only part I don't get is why the lowest setting on the LPF side is 50Hz and the lowest setting on the HPF is 100Hz. If you set the LPF to it's lowest setting you would end up dropping all the critical 50Hz-100Hz range (unless the cutoff slopes aren't that steep), it would make more sense to make 100Hz the lowest for both controls.
-
Best place for a buffer is first in line, unless you have any fuzzes that sound better connected directly to passive pickups. Once your signal has been through one, it is much less prone to signal degradation, meaning that your choice of cable after that point becomes less important. However if you are getting significant signal loss with an active bass, your bass already has a buffer in it, and adding another one won't make much difference. Signal loss after a buffer stage often means you have a damaged patch cable somewhere! I would go for one of the many solderless cabling kits, I've had noise issues with the flat cables due to them using unshielded plastic plugs.
-
And I'll do you a good deal on an OJ that has only seen 5 minutes use, still has the protective film on top! 😉
-
(READ IF YOU HAVE A) Fender '61 Flea Bass (Woes)
dannybuoy replied to hiram.k.hackenbacker's topic in General Discussion
Don't buy them from there then! £52 from Bass Direct for 4 licensed ones: http://bassdirect.co.uk/bass_guitar_specialists/Hipshot,_Licensed_tuners.html -
What kind of sound are you after and what don't you like about the BSF? That would help, as there are just as many that love the Mojomojo as there are that didn't like it. It's quite dark and squishy, great for Motown / Blues etc, but not really bright or aggressive if you want a more modern sounding pedal - for which it would be hard to go wrong with one of these:
-
The Aguilar Agro is worthy of investigation. Set to low gain and presence I can get Blueberryish tones out of it, but it can get much angrier from there!
-
-
The Line 6 product manager has been posting in the Helix HX thread on Talkbass: https://www.talkbass.com/threads/line-6-hx-effects.1324948/page-86#post-21687227
-
I recommend it, and I've been a individual-pedals-on-a-board guy since forever. The Z-Tron envelope filter, B7K and Sansamp models are my favourites, I could easily gig with just this. Although I expect to move to a Line6 Helix HX once they add the Sansamp model they've been hinting at! Much easier to use and better sounding (in terms of amp sims and dirt at least) than the B3 / B1on.
-
Contact Yamaha directly too. They quoted me a price on a set but it was a long time ago.
-
That’s just pretty much just a USB audio interface shaped like a pedal though, not quite what I had in mind. The closest thing in existence to what I’m talking about is this: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/modduo/mod-duo-the-limitless-multi-effects-pedal Various manufacturers could produce a range of devices from the size of the Zoom MS-60B up to the Line6 Helix that could all run the same common plugin format, with no need for a connected PC.
-
I'd be happy to go purely digital though once a few things had been straightened out. All we'd need IMHO is a commercially successful attempt at providing a universal standard for pedals to be able to download new single FX like you can for VST plugins on your DAW. Then you could buy plugin host pedals either as single pedal sized units or huge multis, that can all interchange the same FX, that can be bought from app stores, or from open source. You'd be able to buy either Zoom's, Line6's or Darkglass's own B7K model for example, and either load it into your cheapo Mooer pedal with a couple of knobs on, or your behemoth Helix style unit, or your DAW in the studio. One day!
-
The signal path is analog. In most analog compressors, the bit controlling the volume level (like the engineer's hand on the fader) is also analog (e.g. a light bulb for an optical comp). However in this case, the sidechain is totally digital. So you can have the flexibility of a digital comp where you can have control over tons of parameters like attack, release, knee, etc, but your output signal has been kept pretty pure by only passing though a simple amplifier stage rather than being converted to 1s and 0s and back again.
-
It stands for Impulse Response. Commonly used for cab sims and reverb modellers (to simulate the sound of a specific room), but most pedals you will see would be talking about cab sims. If you feed a white noise signal that contains an equal spread of all frequencies into a cab, then measure what comes out the other end, you end up with a specific EQ curve for that cab. That can then be used to apply a cab sim via digital processing, and you can download a ton of IRs from the web, e.g. one for an Ampeg 8x10. It's a bit more complicated than a simple EQ curve though as it takes time into the equation as well, but that's the general gist of it!
-
You could always run a splitter/daisy chain off the one 15V supply. However I don't recommend the Californiwah and it has nothing to do with the power requirements. I just could not get it to sound good at all!
-
Shame it's not multiband, I can't go back to single band compressors now I have been spoilt by the Spectracomp! Looks awesome though, touch controls show the future of what we might see in the range - I did say I'd like to see a system like the TC RH750's knobs and these look even better with no moving parts. The blurb suggests they were not aware of the Sonuus Voluum though, which is the first compressor with a digital sidechain and analog signal path that I'm aware of! The Hyper Luminal Compressor features the first hybrid design in a compressor pedal: an analog VCA controlled by a digital side-chain allowed us to capture and include the characters of some of the most legendary compressors in history while keeping the signal path completely analog.
-
Small Clone is a chorus, I presume you meant the Small Stone! Both the Small Stone and MXR Phase 90 are great on bass.
-
Splitting, then combining a signal
dannybuoy replied to matt-bass-sparkes's topic in Repairs and Technical
I would try a compressor in the clean low end channel by the way. Or just forget the whole complicated setup and go for a Tech21 DP3-X which combines a crossover, distortion and compression (as well as a tuner) in one small box! -
Splitting, then combining a signal
dannybuoy replied to matt-bass-sparkes's topic in Repairs and Technical
The LS-2 doesn't have a phase switch, no. It will be pretty obvious if you need one, as the volume will drop as you mix the signals together. I'd pick up a used LS-2 first as they're so common and see how you get on. There's not many parallel blenders with phase switches out there, but the Wounded Paw stuff will fit the bill. A phase switch won't always help though if the pedal doing the inversion is something that you want to be able to switch on and off, rather than leave always on. Although the bigger Wounded Paw units have multiple loops and phase switches, and you could place the troublesome pedal in its own loop. I have a Mosquite blender with a phase switch but it's only designed for blending one loop with a clean signal; however you can 'hack' it into being able to blend parallel chains if you have another pedal that can act as a splitter, such as a Boss tuner! -
Splitting, then combining a signal
dannybuoy replied to matt-bass-sparkes's topic in Repairs and Technical
Get a Boss LS-2, problem solved! -
I can't remember how the B3 works, but the newer B3n also overwrites patches as you tweak by default, but you can change it in the settings so that you have to actually press save. So check the manual!
-
Fender Okoume Jazz
-
Try the Z-Tron model for that RHCP track!