la bam

Sorry, posted in wrong section.

Anyone know what's happened to Quilter bass amps? I loved my bb800. Then they brought out the 802, now seemingly nothing?

It was a polite way of saying be humble, just like the real top guys on here are to everyone else.

You do know theres all kinds of bassists on here? From beginners, pub players, club players, pit players, pros, people who do it for fun, touring bands, famous bands, famous bassists and a lot of genuine legends. No ones opinion is worth more than anyone else's. That's what makes this site great - it's a discussion forum, not a platform for im right and youre wrong statements.

I emailed them through their site about a month ago and heard nothing back. I think you have to physically ring them for a response.

I think they're a good basic product. I think they're suffering a bit as lots of people are using the term 'upgrading with.....' and with 'superb Wilkinson etc etc'. They're good. They do a job. But they're not a significant upgrade compared to other brands renowned for being an upgrade.

Yep! Interestingly as well, someone pointed out the similarities between stus amp and his old hartke ha amps. Makes perfect sense.

I always wanted this amp. Everything a class d amp should be. Banded eq, valve and s/s mix and loud and light.

I forgot to add..... most of these higher end speakers also have a kind of mini mixer on the back now, so you can always add in other instruments in there for yourself if needed.

For me, frfr is only used as a fresh canvas to colour. I've gone iems in one band and whilst the other bands are still in rehersal I'm going to talk them into it, but I'm currently at rehersal going straight into the pa. If it helps the very best addition to the sound through the pa is a fantastic 8x10 sim I found. That added (to of all things) a behringer bdi21 gives a fantastic sound. The pa we use isnt cheap - yamaha dxr15, but it's good. Around £500 per speaker. So, if I had to get an amp for any of these bands I'd just get one of them and plug my pedal board into it. Or, to be fair I'd probably end up putting everyone through it and have it as a personal monitor for myself. QSC, RCF all great, but with yamaha you want dxr or dsr. Dont get lesser ones as they are a different quality.

You can make any bass for any genre. All you need is a bit of time to eq and learn how to eq properly. And how to get the guitarists to stay in lane and stop coming into bass territory. If they come down there that's why bassists struggle to be heard or think they have a bad tone. I've played all range of cheap and not so cheap p basses, j basses, stingrays, spectors, pj basses, all sorts in all sorts of music and bands .... and you can get any bass to fit and style. Especially rock. If you're struggling and some gain and drive / break up and it should come singing through.

Hi all, with so much going on with modelling now and impulse responses being downloadable and upload able to pedals etc, I was just wondering - can you make your own? Do you need software etc? If you had an IR and saw its freq graph could you copy it to a back up source etc?

That's exactly how I was when I did it with backline. I found myself just stood there concentrating listening rather than playing /performing.

Was that with still having backline as well? That was my very first experience with them with using too when using backline as well. Now we have no backline, it's a totally different feel.

Regarding back up etc, think of it another way, especially for small/medium gigs. You are actually closer to the pa than the rest of the audience. There is now no other noise on stage (apart from drums) so in theory, if your audience is getting a good all round sound, then you should be. Theres nothing on stage where you are clouding the clarity of the overall audience sound. Worst case scenario slightly tilt the pa inwards so you can hear the front of it better, but you wont really need to.

I take a spare behringer p2 (about £30) and a spare pair of normal earbud headphones. In all honesty, if they were to go down you can still hear the PA clearly, so I probably wouldnt even use the backups.

I've seen the white one. Looks and sounded good. But then when I looked at them for sale (about £900) they seem to be a rock bass version, not the custom sig shown in all the videos etc?

It really does. I dont think I ever had a decent mix using monitors with backline, simply because I had no control over it once set and they were too close to other wedges with other mixes in them. The iems let you just put through what you want into your ears, and theres no extra unwanted noise on stage from 3 or more wedges.

Which colour / style?

One other thing is you dont need to give up your amps to use in ears. You can use your in ears just for your own monitor mix instead of wedges etc. Ie just tickle through what you need to hear.

Some bands have bassists pretty synonymous with a specific bass, but what would you all say U2s Adam Clayton is most recognised with? I really dont know on this one.

That was my experience when I first tried them a few years ago and I didnt try again and went back to amps. I got round it this year by slightly popping out the in ears so they stayed in but I could hear the crowd too. Other ways round are just placing a mic towards the crowd and having that on a channel.

Yes, it's the small pubs etc where I think iems would be great, reasons being: 1. No need to squeeze past every punter who stands in the doorways with your amps on load in and load out. Twist, turn, get injured. 2. As i mentioned before - i genuinely believe it's the amps on stage that cause the issue. They're usually firing directionally at the back of someone's legs, facing the wrong way, and trying to do two jobs (be a monitor and add to FOH sound) and not succeeding efficiently for their intended purpose. For anyone who hasn't tried it, and wants to without the expense, forget iems and just try putting everything through your desk using pedals not amps. I'd be amazed if you couldnt just gig like that as the sound will be so much clearer and balanced through your pa. Then add in your iems in time for your own personal mix if needed. To be clear though, I dont use my iems fully in and sealed like some do (I think that's what puts some people off at first) as I do find I like the ambient noise of the crowd as well. But I get a nice mix of my choosing, fully controllable at any time and FOH sound is much better. With a bit of forethought and planning the whole band can be set up and sound checked in 15 mins too. It just depends what you as a band like. For me, my last band was so loud it was awful. It was literally so loud you couldnt hear the guitarist on stage despite him being 10ft away, yet on his own his sound was so loud it could bend peoples legs. It was just a horrible frequency and volume mess. So it was very hard to play and enjoy and there was hearing damage too. Iems would have sorted that in a day. I'd have been able to sort my own mix and hear everyone and be happy and let the guy worry about the foh sound. Guitarist could have had his own mix of ear splitting mids and guitar twoddle of just him and it wouldnt have affected anyone. As it was because of that awful stage sound the band split.

Yes, works great.

I've gone this route after years of thinking about it. However.... the biggest revelation wasnt that iems are better in themselves or anything else, it was the fact that it's the amps that have been the problem for listening to everyone all these years. Get rid of the amps off stage and I reckon you can even play without iems if you can hear the pa.