drTStingray

Interesting comment - my fretless Ray has no deadspots whatsoever - oh and before anyone asks, the G string has far more mwah and volume than any fretless Fender Jazz I've ever played. It certainly has its sweet spots, however. You can get the colour specs on the Musicman web site (you can prob have any Stingray colour, and also a matching headstock if you want it). You can find a dealer nearest to where you want on the Musicman-uk website (you can also look at the stock they have on there). I have found having the 3 band EQ can be quite useful as boosting the mid range can be helpful in some mixes/songs, especially harmonics. I may have been lucky (dependent on your viewpoint) with my orders for new Musicman basses - they arrived earlier than planned (2 - 4 months) - in my case this meant finding the remainder of the funds earlier than planned.............

Interestingly, my fretless Ray has a bone nut fitted by a luthier for the previous owner - it never had gouges the headstock side of the nuts until I fitted a set of Rotosound Solo bass strings - I replaced these with Ernie Ball Grp 3 flats (which incidentally sound phenominal on this bass) - but they appear to break differently across the nut and don't dig in to the fingerboard the headstock side. Maybe it's just the way I fitted the strings. The bass has no playing or intonation issues at all.

[quote name='Grand Wazoo' timestamp='1343501236' post='1751533'] I must say, if I were to get another EBMM I would go for a Big Al 5 SSS, it was by far the most fun of all of them which I had. (If only they were a bit lighter) [/quote] I always liked your trans red SR5 - I know you had modded electronics in it but the SR5 is the daddy of 5 string basses - great sound and so versatile. As has been said, not everyone gets on with Stingrays so it would be worth trying some out to see what you think - they are all great basses in my mind - you can get standard sounds which make you smile without much bother - and I have used an SR5 for a range of gigs - pop; classic rock; soul; funk; and rockabilly - yes rockabilly! That was an interesting one because someone I know came to that gig, didn't know I was playing in the band and walking through the building into the room had thought the band had a double bass, only to find me playing a fretted SR5 - which rather shocked them! Now I'm not saying my SR5 sounds like a double bass but combined with playing style, it certainly made a sound to fit the band. If you can get on with a Stingray, you'll find it'll fit most genres with some skillful use of the instrument. They are extremely comfortable to play. I did a 45 minute set this afternoon at a local festival with a soul/blues band - I used my fretless SR4 - it was a breeze to play and I went from thumpy P bass finger funk sounds to Jaco/Pino style fretless sounds, to a track with full on slapping - the bass has EB Group 3 flatwounds - I didn't touch the EQ on the amp or bass once after we started and it covered all of this without any bother - in fact it sounded great. I am told it sounded like a fretted bass on the slap and some of the thumpy finger funk stuff - but very obviously a fretless when played in the appropriate style. I hope you find a Stingray you like - I did back in 1980 and bought my last new one about 2 yrs ago..........hmmm cue some newStingray gas..........

Some more examples:- Karma Chamelion - Boy George Paul Young on Live Aid - Pinolladino Bernard Edwards on We Are Family and Good Times (Live at the Budokan concert - You Tube) Brothers Johnson - Light Up the Night Album (eg Stomp) Sade - Smooth Operator

No dispespect the the OP but the question sounds like one of those GSCE English questions!! And the flippant answer is - you'll never know until you try - a bit bit like sex I suppose - no matter how much you talk about it you won't know till you've tried! As for a classic sound, go no further than the first RATM album - Bullet in the Head is a good example - classic tracks and one of several classic Stingray sounds (with those shimering highs and a bit a fret noise). Another one s Nathan Watts on some of the Stevie Wonder stuff from the late 70s onwards - he really plays the bass hard! I was interested to see Jaco mentioned - the Stingray for me can produce that sound live - indeed it can produce the 'pumped up Fender sound' of the mid to late 70s, where people were routing through a pre-amp such as an Alembic (eg a Jazz plus this on I Wish) - that was one of the factors that drew me to buy a Musicman back in 1980 - I could get a sound like my favourite bass players. I couldn't get that with a passive Fender.

[quote name='molan' timestamp='1342864334' post='1741943'] Balance wasn't great though and values plummet like crazy for used ones [/quote] I thought the balance was nice on the one I played - in fact as good if not better than my Bongo. I haven't seen a used one for sale yet - come to think of it, I've never seen a new one for sale in a shop either!! Maybe a good bet to get one used then. You guys should see the white one with black binding - now that is a classy looking bass!

Also want, can't afford. Indeed it is a thing of beauty - even the black one, because it has white binding and looks very nice. I played one once for a long time through headphones - quite a lightweight bass and some fantastic sounds in there. Active/passive; series/parallel, coil combination selectors plus 4 band EQ - what more could you want? Well a Reflex Gamechanger.............some very interesting sound samples been posted on the Musicman website using combinations of coils out of phase and in phase. I think I'm going to have to get one of these at some point.

[quote name='Duarte' timestamp='1342217379' post='1732086'] THIS bass is exquisite. Blew me away when I played it. Nicer than my early 90s Sterling... [/quote] Cheers Zac - good to hear from you - still love your Sterling btw.

[quote name='Gunsfreddy2003' timestamp='1342297423' post='1733069'] Manged to take some pics today of the pre EB neck/headstock and the Classic so that you can see what you get in terms of "better woodwork". I think the Classics do look really good. [/quote] Very nice woodwork there - in both cases

[quote name='MattM' timestamp='1342257606' post='1732334'] I'm jammy enough to own this : Specked up by a Mr Lindsay of this parish. 2EQ, unlined, tobacco burst (newer 3 tone bursts a wee bit too dark to match Pinos),wheel of fortune, 6 bolt. Gorgeous. If you whacked through stringing, mutes and a flamed/birdseye neck on there, you'd be sorted. Mwah.... [/quote] Absolutely gorgeous. [quote name='Ou7shined' timestamp='1342272750' post='1732634'] Me too. Actually I'm not sure immune best describes it, allergic might be more appropriate. [/quote] It's actually very nice indeed, but I'd admit the colour's not to everyone's taste - however I've already got a natural and a sunburst so don't want any more...................for now!!!

Ha ha - I have an aversion to pointy guitars also - even EBMM ones! One or two of the pre EB fans rave about early 80s Rays - something to do with neck feel/radius and a lot of the colours have alder bodies, so a bit mellower sounding apparently. Thanks re the Classic - to be honest I use it most of the time.

I don't know if you're aware but your 82 is probably a Jackson Charvel Ray - according to Sterling Ball, they made them for a while early 80s - I'd try and fund a Classic Ray than sell that. If I had any money I'd make you an offer!! Yeah the coral red is a very nice bass - I turn the bass right up on the Ray and cut the bass pot slightly on the LM3 the bass EQ sounds so good on the Ray. A couple more pics for you...............sorry if this turns up the GAS. [attachment=113072:16042011994.jpg] [attachment=113073:16042011987.jpg] [attachment=113076:16042011996.jpg] [attachment=113077:16042011997.jpg]

[quote name='stingrayPete1977' timestamp='1342210797' post='1731926'] You know you're as sad as me and can spot the missing fret marker from 200 yards though! [/quote] Not unless they're side by side, and on a maple board - then at least 300 yards!!! I agree with you, they're great - that's why I bought my first one - Pete bass enthusiasts are definitely sad, but compared with guitar enthusiasts - positively mild IMO!!!

[quote name='drTStingray' timestamp='1342210230' post='1731908'] Luke I missed some........ Different neck radius (based on pre EB I think) Skinny frets Slab body Your post is very witty, and I'm sure you were joking - 1) something that might increase the sustain - yes true 2) something to stop the sustain - yes true - or control it, or leave it as it is - remember you have working controls on a Stingray 3) softer versions of maple less suitable for a bass neck than non figured - a moot point - many people would say something rhyming with ball cocks - any way it's heavily lacquered so highly umlikely to have a down side and looks/feels/plays great 4) a shiney thing - true - and it's about the best/easiest truss rod system available 5) a different sticker on it - yep 6) another shiny thing - yep 7) pretty colours - depends on your taste I guess - some may hate them - is retro sunburst and natural pretty?? Stock bass colours surely? and 8) possibly a 5th string - if you really must! I paid a premium of about £250 at the time over a stock Ray ordered as a special order (as this was) and am more than happy. Now to make a comparison, a bass I like begins with P - I can buy essentially the same instrument with a £2000 price difference - fancy strings, famous bass player name, different sticker, select wood plus less mass produced - nowI think that differential is rather more than I'm prepared to justify, but an extra £250 for the Ray of my dreams..............no prob I'm with you on 90s Rays - I love them. I also put the bass on full and control the zing by adjusting the treble - I've even put Cobalt strings on it - and a Markbass rig - the whole lot sounds brilliant to my ears so it's utopia for me. The old pre-EBs I really like as well but I don't think they look that different - very variable weight (up to 15 lbs!!!!!), maybe a little mojo from age, and sometimes variable quality - the sunburst wore through to the wood on the heel strap button and on the top - anybody on here got it - I'd love to buy it back!! I think the Classic Ray is an example of where a new bass is a good bet. Anyway - comment away - wonder when they're gonna do a Pino Palladino Ray signature...........!! [/quote]

[quote name='baseline9' timestamp='1342187801' post='1731177'] I have a 90s, 2eq eb sting ray, sounds ace, I used to have all the pots turned up full but I fried my pre amp after about 5 years and had to replace, I back them off a bit now Never played an pre eb sting ray, on my to do list tho [/quote] [quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1342188172' post='1731192'] so translated... this bass will give you.... 1) something that might increase the sustain 2) something to stop the sustain 3) softer versions of maple less suitable for a bass neck than non figured 4) a shiney thing 5) a different sticker on it 6) another shiny thing 7) pretty colours. and 8) possibly a 5th string [/quote] Luke I missed some........ Different neck radius (based on pre EB I think) Skinny frets Slab body Your post is very witty, and I'm sure you were joking - 1) something that might increase the sustain - yes true 2) something to stop the sustain - yes true - or control it, or leave it as it is - remember you have working controls on a Stingray 3) softer versions of maple less suitable for a bass neck than non figured - a moot point - many people would say something rhyming with ball cocks - any way it's heavily lacquered so highly umlikely to have a down side and looks/feels/plays great 4) a shiney thing - true - and it's about the best/easiest truss rod system available 5) a different sticker on it - yep 6) another shiny thing - yep 7) pretty colours - depends on your taste I guess - some may hate them - is retro sunburst and natural pretty?? Stock bass colours surely? and 8) possibly a 5th string - if you really must! I paid a premium of about £250 at the time over a stock Ray ordered as a special order (as this was) and am more than happy. Now to make a comparison, a bass I like begins with P - I can buy essentially the same instrument with a £2000 price difference - fancy strings, famous bass player name, different sticker, select wood plus less mass produced - nowI think that differential is rather more than I'm prepared to justify, but an extra £250 for the Ray of my dreams..............no prob I'm with you on 90s Rays - I love them. I also put the bass on full and control the zing by adjusting the treble - I've even put Cobalt strings on it - and a Markbass rig - the whole lot sounds brilliant to my ears so it's utopia for me. The old pre-EBs I really like as well but I don't think they look that different - very variable weight (up to 15 lbs!!!!!), maybe a little mojo from age, and sometimes variable quality. I think the Classic Ray is an example of where a new bass is a good bet. Anyway - comment away - wonder when they're gonna do a Pino Palladino Ray signature!!

[quote name='zero9' timestamp='1342093595' post='1729408'] Quite fancy a 'classic' Stingray, however, does anyone have comparable experience between the 'classic' model and the standard Stingray? Are they worth the extra? Apologies in advance if this query has been posted before (I did manage to find something on talkbass). Cheers, Wil [/quote] Well the difference is you get:- 1) A strings through bridge - lots of debate over the effect but suffice it to say my Classic has ludicrous amounts of sustain - more than other Stingrays I had/have. 2) Mute assembly on the bridge - useful for getting a very thumpy old school sound 3) Choice of birds eye or flamed maple neck with laquered finish 4) Chrome truss rod adjuster wheel 5) Mid 80s headstock logo 6) Original chrome battery box cover 7) Different range of colours - dependent on colour choice, the pick up cover is white or black (but you can buy covers if you don't like the colour you get) The rest is the same as a stock 2 band Stingray - the EQ has been the same spec more or less since 1979 - my Classic is capable of being a bit more aggresive sounding than my 1980 pre EB sunburst was - possibly because it had an alder body whereas all the Classics are ash. So for me it was worth it just for the cosmetic touches, and especially the neck - it's more of a re-make of the early 90s era Ray with the strings through bridge than a re-make of a pre EB bass. You can probably get a good deal on one if you shop around, and who knows on future values but they're probably one of the nicest Stingrays made in recent years which should count for something. I use mine all the time.

[quote name='Looper' timestamp='1331806291' post='1579046'] and possibly the most important is actually the technique and style of the player. [/quote] I suspect this is far more important than anything else. FWIW I think the Jazz can be made to make a nasally sound which the P can't - and the Jazz can't thump like a P bass (there's an isolated bass track on You Tube of Jamerson playing What's Going On - and you can hear what I mean by thump - it sounds a bit like speaker excursion caused by striking the string very hard - I think Larry Taylor got the same effect in Canned Heat (there are one or two nice solos on live albums) - all that said Leo Lyons gets a similar effect live on solos on the Ten Years After album Undead - not quite as punchy - on a Jazz)

Nice post Sime 17 - and I agree with your view on the single coil settings - the neck pick up soloed, with boosted mids and played quite harshly gives a nice Amembicy sort of sound. [quote name='sime17' timestamp='1341867862' post='1725489'] Buying an EBMM of course also gives you the right to spout forth on the scariest and most cultish forum on earth, apparently[/quote] Lol - I'm guessing you mean the EBMM forum which does seem to have a very scary reputation - but honestly, the worst you're likely to encounter there is someone mistaking The Shadows for The Ventures (sacrilege in some people's view!!), or perhaps ignoring you - but Talkbass.........well it seems you're likely to be savaged at a hundred yards if you don't concur with commonly held views that a vintage Fender is the epitomy of modern electric bass and everything else has in-built design, style or sound faults which must be exposed and debated until the opposition is quelled!!

My HH Ray is my most versatile bass - does the standard Stingray thing, but with both pick ups in humbucker mode, it has the most killer slap tone, and for fingerstyle playing, smooths out the Stingray bite. The single coil settings are also great, usable tones - and it is the lightest Musicman I have. They're usually the upper end of 9 lbs but this is at least a pound lighter. Worth trying one IMO.

Do you mean like this, Mushers? I think it's very probable you need one but only you can tell - well at least that's what happens to me when I want a Musicman bass

They'll give you the exact date when they reply to you, so it is worth picking up - the value is basically what people are willing to pay in the market. Until basses become quite old, and even then only if they are sought after, do they start to increase in value again. Have a look on Ebay at previous sales - that will give you an idea - the colour's a nice one so maybe several people would bid against each other on Ebay - I once bid on a 87 Stingray and it went way out of my price bracket for the instrument at that time - about £1300. I bid on and won my 93 fretless (same colour as yours) a couple of weeks later for just over £750. Some go for more - it just depends if there is someone who really wants the bass at the time.

I have DR Marcus Miller fatbeams on my Stingray 5 - 125,105,85,65,45 and EB Cobalt Slinkies on my Bongo 5 - 130,100,80,65,45 I would prefer a 125 on the Bongo but they don't yet make a cobalt string in that guage. I've found Musicman basses get the best sound balance across strings using 100,80,65,45 (on 4 string)

[quote name='Ou7shined' timestamp='1340467046' post='1704882'] There's lots they aren't too enamoured with. I'm a self confessed 2eq 'ray-phile and long standing member of the EB forum, so I know full well what goes on, what's tolerated and what's not. I find a forum where the lack of freedom to express views on the existence of other breeds of bass affects my strong sense of[color=#000000] impartiality, subsequently I rarely if ever contribute. [/color]I am a fanboy... but not that much of a fanboy. [/quote] Yeah I know what you mean - it was not good a few years back and I didn't go on there for about a year back then, and got seriously annoyed - but it's a lot better now - quite a few people such as Sterling Ball have actually said they like Precisions and the like. One or two people got banned for one reason or another and have dissed it since - understandable to an extent on both sides - but you can't expect to run threads on improved replacement pick ups and pre amps on a manufacturers forum eh? Which is the point of a forum like this where you don't have to toe manufacturer rules quite so strongly! Talkbass can get a bit strange if people criticise (seemingly quite rightly) a very big manufacturer - threads get closed - one wonders if they might be a contributing sponsor by any chance??!! The Greek - that's Rod Trussbroken's site - it's not the Musicman serial number database, which EBMM holds (because it's their manufacturing record). That said, several of my basses are listed there, but only because I gave him the info (having got it off EBMM) - it's not a complete record.

[quote name='Ou7shined' timestamp='1340459659' post='1704739'] Don't forget to tell them about your love of Fenders, they'll welcome you with open arms. [/quote] Well yeah - as it's a manfacturers forum you'd expect them to not be too enamoured with people doing that - more likely just ignore it - having said that Sterling Ball did ask someone recently to 'cut Fender some slack' when they were moaning about Fender's customer service/quality control in comparison with Musicman's. However Musicman is a much smaller operation not dealing with the level of mass production as Fender - there again Fender's CEO isn't conspicuous by appearence in public to answer questions eh, Pike? Back to the original sunburst colour on Musicman basses - the thing with that colour is the effect under stage lights - really brings the yellow up - a clear pg sounds a nice plan.

The problem with these internet comparisons is they always show different tones on the Fenders (2 for the P and 3 or 4 for the Jazz), and one on the Stingray. The difference with the Stingray is it has real tone controls with extensive and interractive range rather than effectively a tone on and off switch which the Fenders have - thus it has a lot more versatility and because of the dynamic created by the active EQ, a more noticeable difference created by different playing styles. The Jazz, with a volume for each pick up, has a range of tones created by blending the pus, in the same way the Stingray has from blending the bass, middle and treble controls. And that's just the electronics - different body woods make the underlying sound subtly different. Your best bet is to go and try some out, then you'll see how each bass fits your playing style and you can choose the best for what you want to achieve. I ilke them all (but much favour the Stingray as it suits my playing style and many of my favourite bass performance are on them) but recognise that in some cases, you will only get the best approximation of the sound of a particular track from one specific instrument, no matter how hard you try.