Jump to content
Why become a member? Γ—

Maude

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by Maude

  1. I have large collection of cheap rubbish. I'm not sure what that says about me. 😐
  2. If you type 'bass player' into Google images, nearly every picture shows a professional bassist with their forearm resting on the bass. Hence most basses having a forearm contour. It's not that hard to understand is it?
  3. Jesus Loves You, But I Don't - The Almighty
  4. I do like both, but I prefer the old. It's not that difficult. I like white basses and I like black ones, but I prefer white.
  5. That's fair enough and I completely get it. For what it's worth, in use I much prefer the Embassy / Vintage Pro Thunderbird bridge and tailpiece over the three point bridge. But once set up it's kind of irrelevant. But then I think I prefer the look of the classic three point bridge. Helpful aren't I? πŸ˜„
  6. I enjoyed that. πŸ™‚πŸ‘
  7. Was is it about the Thunderbird you're after, tone or looks? If it's the whole image then as you were. But if it's just the tone then how about the Epiphone Embassy? From what I understand the pickups and electrics are the same as the vintage pro Thunderbird, and in a very similar position, bridge PU looks identical, neck PU looks to be slightly further neckwards than the Thunderbird. I haven't weighed mine but I think they're lighter than the Thunderbird. Maybe worth a look?.
  8. Yes it's easier if using their entire systems as, although probably terrible sounding, it's designed to work at their level. Using your own kit might need some on the fly adjustments to stay within limits, which doesn't make playing enjoyable when your mind is on sound adjustments. Then the knock on is underperforming. I'd say give yourself as much time before kick off to get your sound sorted, but usually at a wedding your don't get much time and can't make much noise.
  9. I'm confused. Nothing I've posted has mentioned a 96db limit has it?
  10. This some of the email, the venue name has been deleted, although it shouldn't matter. Music at ************ finishes at 11.30pm β€’ All amplified outputs must go through our system and this is a requirement to play at ********* β€’ Due to the system and the size of the venue we find that bands do not need to use monitors. β€’ The array system works well and is easy to use by the bands and DJs and all our bands and DJs that have worked with the system have had successful events β€’ We can achieve a good volume level focused on the dance floor and an excellent ambient level throughout the venue β€’ The Venue is a 15m x 10m room. The Band / DJ and dance floor area 5m x 7m area. The venue is small and intimate and the maximum numbers we have are 140 people. The array sound system β€’ We have a 5m x 5m panel in the ceiling of the event room. Within this panel are 300 directional speakers. Unlike standard speakers from which you get a cone pattern of sound, these directional speakers focus the sound as beams onto the dance floor. The effect of this is you get a focus of the sound on the dance floor, which is a 5m x 5m area, and then a noise level drop off of around 10db outside that area. This means for those wanting to dance get the loudest result and those wanting to chat and are not on the dance floor get a reduced ambient noise level. This noise level profile works really well for an event. β€’ The output from your mixing desk into our wall sockets should be line level only. We cannot plug speaker level signals into our system. β€’ To plug into the system we have 2 XLR sockets in the wall of the venue. Bands / DJs plug their mixing desk, laptop etc. directly into the XLR sockets. The system has its own amp that powers the speakers. β€’ We have a DI box for the base guitar to replace a base guitar amp and to feed into your mixing desk, which would then plug into our system. We would ask you to use in ear monitoring if you have it and we have found that bands don’t need monitors with our system. β€’ All amplified outputs from the Band / DJ must go through our system and this is our requirement to play at ***********. This enables us to adhere to our license with regards to noise levels. β€’ The band or DJ set up behind the dance floor area and therefore don’t have to hear the maximum sound level, this works well and enables the bands to play without the use of monitors. This reduces the equipment you need to bring to the event. There is very limited feedback with this set up. We have our sound limiter and it is set at a reasonable level. Occasionally loud drumming might set it off. Please be prepared to bring any damping you may need to prevent this. Although it's not enjoyable, if I was running an event site and had strict noise limits imposed on me, I make sure bands had to stick them. Saying it's not enjoyable isn't strictly true, there's always the traffic light game to play. Every limiter I've had to play within has had some sort of light warning system that you are approaching the limit. The fun is had by keeping the very last light lit but not tripping it. 😁 For clarity what is being asked for in the OP is over the top.
  11. I'd guess every venues noise limiter is set to a different level, depending on their soundproofing, proximity of neighbours and how big an a$$hole the neighbours are. The email sent to me by the venue I mentioned stated that loud drumming would set off their limiter so bring damping. That band had a cajon with a electronic drum pad for some songs so not a problem, to a degree.
  12. Yes, I'll admit it was partially our own fault as we aren't set up for in-ears. If we were we could have performed better. We aren't a 'wedding band' but what we do does suit that type of event. We were asked as we'd been seen in a pub playing and it was the type of thing they wanted, rather than the usual function band. We were assured by the venue that monitoring wouldn't be necessary. Yeah I know. πŸ™„
  13. We played a wedding with one of those terrible systems, funnily enough in a converted barn in what used to be the Yarg cheese dairy. The 'speaker' was a flat panel above the dance floor facing straight down. Designed to flood the dance floor with sound but with minimal seepage to the rest of the room. We weren't allowed monitors or backline. That band was all acoustic but always fully amped, guitar, mandolin, doublebass, cajon, vocals. We couldn't hear ourselves at all, and as a result felt we were pretty bad. Got some good feedback afterwards but who knows. Playing doublebass when you simply can't hear it (the background noise of people drowned out any useful acoustic sound from it) was horrible. The singer said the same and harmonising backing vocals when you can't hear the singer is near impossible, so you hold off doing them. As a result the whole performance was lacklustre and restrained as subconsciously you hold back as you can't hear yourself. The DJ said he has spent hours and hours at that venue EQing trying to get the best sound possible, but he said the best he can get is just make it as sterile sounding as possible, he likened it to sounding like the dashboard speakers of seventies a car and said he hates having to DJ there. But, and here's the thing, people enjoyed it. Average folks don't know good sound from bad and the ones that wanted to sing and dance did and the ones that wanted to sit and talk did, likewise with the ones propping up the bar. So the band and the DJ hated it, but were well compensated for their misery, the wedding party had a great time and venue made a fortune.
  14. I'm going to see them later in the year and would absolutely be singing along to any early stuff they play. I'd love to see the RHCP again but I'll make do with the SPP. Also the tickets were a gift so whaddyagonnado? πŸ˜‰ Ohhh me and my me and my me and my, me and my frieeeends.
  15. Surely they both follow the old action and reaction thing though. People kill so a rule was made that you shouldn't kill. X then Y causes an explosion so a rule is made that you shouldn't do X then Y. If X then Y didn't cause an explosion and people didn't kill then there'd be no need for either rule. In much the same way that if basses weren't so damn perdy I wouldn't keep buying the bloody things. πŸ˜‰πŸ‘
  16. These days Β£400 gets you some superb basses new, too many to list realistically, that will all be great. There's an even better selection second hand. It all depends what sort of thing you want, traditional, modern, solid, hollow, fretted, fretless, 4,5 or more string. What's the best sub Β£400 bass? Yes. But get the BB424, if you can squeeze a tiny bit more into the budget or be patient, you could even get a BB1024. πŸ™‚πŸ‘
  17. No problem, it's here if you need it. Members of the 'Kay Restorative And Preservationists Ethical Salvage Trust' (KRAPEST) need to help each other out if possible. πŸ˜‰πŸ‘
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...