Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Lfalex v1.1

Member
  • Posts

    5,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Lfalex v1.1

  • Birthday 18/04/1973

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Lfalex v1.1's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • Great Content Rare
  • Basschat Hero Rare

Recent Badges

2.2k

Total Watts

  1. Definitely Floaty. Reason; that enormous top horn makes the balance so good that you forget it's even on, in spite of it being a middle-weight.
  2. Now do this on a darkened stage when you've broken a string... No thanks!
  3. I'm sure there are companies (or maybe even luthiers) that could fabricate a one-off, bolt-on Bongo neck. Whether or not they've the expertise to lay it up to allow sufficient flexion in the right place/s for the truss rod (if there even is one!) to do it's job is another matter. Cost? Likely horrific. Result? Likely rather good. I've a Bongo, and it's quite something already!
  4. I don't know. I haven't tried everything yet, and even when I had, one probably wouldn't cover everything. Sound Familiar?
  5. I would tend to use HPFs and amp eqs to protect drivers/amps and clean up the on stage/ rehearsal sound. If I have to use the onboard DI, it'll be pre-EQ if possible. I favour outboard preamps for instrument tone manipulation, and it's their DI I'd rather send to the desk.
  6. I favour 45-100 anyway, but was pleased when my Bongo turned up wearing 32-45-65-80-100-130. Perfect. As you can tell, it's generally my gauge of choice, but fewer manufacturers do the "jybrid" gauge. Most have moved to 45-65-85-105.
  7. Because. Tony Levin. (And if you don't want it... I'll give it a home!)
  8. Uh... That box isn't a 1153 carcass. I had a H122smx combo, and it was slimmer than a 2103h and slimmer than the 1153 upon which it often stood. Same drivers (originally) in the combos as the cabs, but the ports are shorter. Reasons for shallower box? Twofold. 1) You'd never find the connections on the rear of the amp even in daylight; they'd be buried 5" into the sleeve in which the amp sits 2) That TE Achilles' heel. Weight. The H122smx was already brutally heavy. Any more MDF and no one would be able to move it at all.
  9. Definitely an approach I favour. I love a bass as much as the next person. Unfortunately, I tend to view amps as a tool for a job, and that makes it difficult to justify splashing the cash on the Emperor's New Clothes in the amplification world. Result- an old 4u rack containing a Korg DTR1000, an ancient Ampeg SVP-PRO and a Markbass Club Series S450. Does a pristine clean, A warm clean and all the way to flat out dirty. Cab is a Schroeder 21012L. It'll take 1000w @ 4 Ohms. Weighs a smidge over 40lb. Last time anyone commented on it, they said "Looks old..." Maybe not ultra-modern, but it blew him across the room readily enough.
  10. (Not having read the rest of the thread..) Are the 3x10 going to be 2x10 (8 Ohm) in series themselves in parallel with a 16 Ohm 1x10 all in one box? That'd give a nominal 8 Ohm impedance, allowing a separate 1x10 (8 Ohm) to be used in parallel as permitted by most amps having a ~4 Ohm minimum load.. Edit- Nope. 3x 12 Ohm drivers for a 4 Ohm cab. Adding another cabinet isn't happening without another amp to drive it, or something that can stretch down to 2 Ohm loads.
  11. We went to Glastonbury once. It was a deeply frustrating experience, we hated it and left. The festival wasn't on at the time. I can only imagine it to be like a special eighth circle of Hell when it is.
  12. Nice. Not dissimilar to the Fortress Flashback from many years ago. That was frequently green with a pearly plate.
  13. That's no fun. The more the merrier!
  14. If you're stacking them, maybe put the 8 Ohm on the top? It'll be closer to ear level and that might help compensate for any perceived difference in SPL.
×
×
  • Create New...