Thanks Clivem, I'd thought of weight, stiffness and resonance/energy transfer, but didn't consider dead spots.
Not that I can recall any of my instruments having had any significant dead spots.
Which begs the questions;
What difference do they make? And is it really noticable?
I know modern Ibanez designs favour slender necks, but I've never had any issues with what I assume to be the steel/alloy items in my SRX 700 or EDB 605. Nor any other bass I've owned, for that matter.
*Except the Vigier. It doesn't have a truss rod.
Edit.. KTS do Ti bridge saddles, too..
Put an onboard pre-amp in the fretless?
It needn't even have tone controls, just increase the level and be able to drive longer cables.
Failing that, maybe a hotter (passive) pickup ?
The design and weight make some sense.. my experiences with headless basses (Status Streamline and Hohner B2A) suggest that some mass is desirable in terms of tone (they were obviously too light)
The original Steinbergers were much heavier and sound better to my ears.
None of the ultra minimalist designs are as good when seated as a regular bass.
I had a Squier 70s VMJ.
Had a better neck than my MIA jazz.
Again, the pickups & electrics were the weak point. I'd already put a Badass II on it, and the pickups would've been next, but I had to sell it to raise some cash.
They're not that expensive compared to what I generally pay for 4 string electric sets..
P.S.
I'd expect tapewounds to outlast phosphor bronze rounds by about 4 times under my sweaty mitts
If I were making a number of bolt-on-neck bass models, I'd make all the necks identical in terms of dimensions, if only to simplify production and to make them readily interchangeable if one were to be damaged.
Whilst I've had 3 Warwicks in the house at once, they were a 4,5 and a 6, so I can't compare them!
Edit: I really like the balance of the Fortress Masterman 5 I have. Arguably the best I've owned. Shame it's ever-so-slightly "slabby" in terms of the body being so flat. If the forearm chamfer followed the line of the body rather than being diagonal, it'd look better.
Depends on how you define "baseball bat" in terms of a neck!
I had a Yamaha Attitude, and whilst it was chunky, the neck wasn't as deep as, say, my Warwick Infinity. That's narrower, but deeper, and feels more like a baseball bat (nearer to circular)
Nice ideas in here.
Personally, I've always fancied a bass with NO internal electrics at all, but the pickups routed to two separate Jack sockets, one per pickup.
Then just have an off-board pre amp or even passive controls that you can customize ad infinitum without taking the instrument apart.
Only potential issue is noise. You could have active and passive options in the external unit. Or even a pre amp per pickup.. but that's getting expensive now!
"Untitled"-
Silver chair, Fugazi, Blink 182, Smashing pumpkins, Crash Test Dummies, The Cure, Eminem, Fuel, Gazette, Interpol, Lemonheads, Marilyn Manson, Pearl Jam, Pig Destroyer, Orbital, REM, Radiohead, Swans... And more
I recommend Yamaha Attitudes.
That big neck (and it is up by the neck) pick-up, leaves little room for a thumb to slap effectively and none for fingers to "pop" from beneath the G or D strings.
Same as the Gibsons that sport neck pick-ups in that position.
Sorry if it's already been mentioned, but isn't the Bona model reminiscent of the Michael Manring Zon Hyperbass? (but with frets and without de-tuners)
I'm not normally bothered by aesthetics, but the fact that no two angles (and there's lots of them!) seem to correspond to each other in any kind of order makes it all look a bit.... Random.
I know that the frets are fanned according to a formula and the bridge saddles are correctly placed with the pickups properly angled, but they don't visually correlate to each other or any of the angles in the body shape.