munkonthehill

these are lovely looking cabs. I was gunning for one of these not too long ago. However due to the purchase of ampegs lightweight stuff i am sorted now. In saying that,,,,these are very tempting

[quote name='tom1946' post='1048974' date='Dec 6 2010, 06:42 AM']NEIN NEIN!! you cannot sell zis Jaguar! we will hunt you down [/quote] aaahhhhhhhh mods!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! im being cyber bullied. Until I feel safe again I feel the Jag will be staying with me

[quote name='Musicman20' post='1049143' date='Dec 6 2010, 11:50 AM']Man that was a cheap price...Im shocked it didnt go before. I think its just a sign of the times...for the next year im going to try not sell anything[/quote] damn tootin G... that really is alot of bass for the money thats asked.

[quote name='Macko1968' post='1047988' date='Dec 5 2010, 09:05 AM']Whilst it was useful for someone to flag up that the bass sold a week earlier for a lot less I don't see where in the rules anyone is prevented from trying to turn a profit. If someone had bought the bass though & then found out it went for considerably less a week earlier the only person they could have any issue with is themselves, no-one forced them to pay the inflated price & they had equal opportunity to buy the bass at the original price but didn't take it. Buyers take responsibility for determining if something is worth the asking price to them & as long as what they pay for is what they receive, they can have no complaints. I'd also take issue with some comments about member's standing - how long you have been here, how much you contribute doesn't excuse anyone their obligations when it comes to manners. The seller only became arsey after after some pretty arsey messages were directed at him, as mature adults we should be able to disagree about prices without being disagreeable. I find the community "looking out for it's own" a little difficult to swallow at the moment when there are some members whose own practices are questionable. I know of one for sale add at the minute where a long-standing member is asking £x because "that's what I paid for it" - I happen to know they paid less for it. I've not taken them to task over it because I figure the asking price for the bass will decide if it sells or not. I also see numerous adds stating "pay pal, if you pay [b]the[/b] fees. That should read "if you pay [b]my[/b] fees". The fees are the sellers responsibility yet some members expect the community to bear the costs of pay pal when buying & selling so they can use it for free - hardly in the spirit of a community. Talkbass is ahead of us in this respect, requiring sellers to abide by their paypal agreement & not pass on fees to buyers. It's an entirely laudable approach that the community is trying to take but, without explicit instruction in the rules, the situation around this sale will continue to arise. I would like to hear from the moderators on this subject, if profiteering is allowed then many of the comments on this thread should be removed, if it's not then the rules need updating & the seller informed of their transgression in a constructive manner by PM.[/quote] You do have some points I agree with, however this paypal fee topic is nowt to do with 'community spirit' its to do with losing out on YOUR asking price as the buyer cant do a bacs transfer or any other method that would not incur fees and losing out on your full asking price. I think giving the option of paypal is a decent thing to do, however as this is a fee option, then surely as this option is selected by the buyer, then the buyer should foot the bill!!!! I recently bought some ampeg gear from this site and paypal was the easiest and quickest method of payment for both parties....I happily footed the bill and when the seller offered to split the difference I refused his money. Now thats 'community spirit'