Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

redstriper

Member
  • Posts

    1,736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by redstriper

  1. I like Musicmasters, especially the early ones - they got very heavy like most Fenders in the late 70s and 80s. I played a very nice 1976 one recently and I'd be happy to own it (if I could afford it). The intonation wasn't perfect and difficult to get right due to the shared saddles, but it's close enough for jazz It could even be the same bass - the owner is from down your way.
  2. [font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][size=4][color=#000000]To promote the album, Cave performed the album this month in sequence, knowing that it would be shared:[/color][/size][/font] [url="http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=1373"]http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=1373[/url] You can save the tracks by right clicking the player and selecting 'save as'.
  3. [quote name='mingsta' timestamp='1362152902' post='1996529'] Thats not stupid. Unless you then went on to sell the Wal!!! [/quote] I never got on with the Wal and sold it soon afterwards at a loss to help buy a house.
  4. I'm as guilty as anyone else for not appreciating other artists work on here. I do listen to anything that takes my fancy and I have enjoyed a couple of things very much, but a lot is not to my taste and I'm sure that's the same for many of us. Best 3 finds for me were Kit Richardson, Hour Of The Dog and Jake Brown's version of Superstition at a college session.
  5. Thanks people, look forward to sharing a stage with Hour Of The Dog sometime Here's some crappy home made videos to go with the album - no nudity unfortunately: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brrWGFuVnGY&feature=share&list=PLmzSQFWqjqKoTRQIOOvws9DEXnYoh5waz[/media]
  6. The last Precision I had was in the 70s - an Aria PB that I stupidly sold to get a Wal. I'm now looking at an 80s Tokai Hardpuncher to feed my P bass gas.
  7. I rarely promote my band on here because there is so little interest, which is fairy nuff - why should I expect anyone else to dig the music I love to make? I recently posted a link to our new album and as usual received not a single comment. It's fine though - we are not special or unique - just another band well used to rejection, doing it for love not money Here's the link in case you missed it (lol): [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/199139-new-tacsi-album-free-download/page__fromsearch__1"]http://basschat.co.uk/topic/199139-new-tacsi-album-free-download/page__fromsearch__1[/url]
  8. The same thing has happened to me and I've only played Jazz basses for 30 years - this doesn't help: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoVfamlcbYo[/media]
  9. Good point Nig, well made - we are all doomed though
  10. Brilliant - great video, interesting sounding band too
  11. [quote name='iceonaboy' timestamp='1361833468' post='1991817'] I just bought an Electrovoice PA two ELX115P's powered tops and two ELX118P's powered subs. The desk is a Peavey pv14. We just set it up at the weekend for the first time and its a killer rig. Sounds amazing! [/quote] What are you using as monitors? Are there enough aux sends on the Peavey desk to allow different monitor mixes and use the internal FX too? Thanks.
  12. We are also looking foe a new PA for the band and to hire out. That Mackie i-pad desk looks brilliant - what a great idea. Powered cabs and monitors seem the simplest solution, but which ones? [color=#282828][font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]The HK Audio stuff looks great.[/font][/color]
  13. I had a similar experience with Napster when it first started. I'm a big fan of rare Jamaican 7" singles, but most of them had not been reissued on CD at that time and they were all but impossible to find on vinyl. It was fantastic to find loads on Napster and the chat facility meant I made contacts with other fans all over the world. I even made contact with Jackie Mittoo's nephew and exchanged emails with his mother. Within a couple of years many of these rare recordings started to appear on CD and I bought many, including artists I had never heard of before Napster. Since then this music has enjoyed a big revival, with old ska and rocksteady tunes often used in radio broadcasts, TV ads and in films. This has generated a new and unexpected revenue stream for the copyright holders and it is an example of the power of file sharing, Music has a life of it's own after it is released and the idea that an artist would want to prevent it's sharing seems odd to me.
  14. [quote name='Zenitram' timestamp='1361671227' post='1989201'] Interesting piece: [url="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/feb/24/napster-music-free-file-sharing"]http://www.guardian....ee-file-sharing[/url] [/quote] Yes it is, thanks for the link I'd forgotten the early days of Napster and tiny download speeds before broadband. It makes you wonder where it will all end...
  15. I hope they do it with basses and plug them in to hear the tone differences. The price difference between a Squier and a custom shop Fender is extreme.
  16. Thom, you seem very sincere and I doubt we will agree, so let's leave it at that - I'm sure we both have far more interesting and important things to do with our time. I wish you all the best despite our different view points
  17. [quote name='ThomBassmonkey' timestamp='1361625849' post='1988437'] If you think the world shouldn't change, then you're in the very extreme minority. I, for one, don't think that people should continue to starve to death, be abused or be ripped off for their work. We're working towards ideals and although they might be a long way off, they're ideals, not immediate plans. Of course you could roll over and accept that these things happen, but I think it'd be nice for things to improve over time, even if it's after we're all dead and buried, someone can still enjoy the progress we've made. [/quote] It doesn't make any difference what you or I think, the world will change and we have no control over it. Starvation and inequality could be stopped very easily if the people who run the world wanted it and things will not improve gradually over time just because ordinary people want it to. [quote] Anyone has a right to voice their opinion, it doesn't mean their life stops because of it. As for the least affected, the first people to realy kick up a fuss and bring it to peoples' attention was Metallica, although I'm sure they're comfy with the amount they're earning anyway, I highly doubt that it's small amounts they're losing to piracy. Arguably for small bands, it's more of a problem because every penny counts. [/quote] I don't remember saying anyone's life would stop by voicing an opinion, although there are many examples of the phenomenon. I fully respect your opinion, even though I disagree and I'm sure you will show me the same courtesy. Metallica are one of many bands who don't like file sharing and I understand their POV, but it won't make any difference, whether they like it or not. [quote] I don't know how much my band is losing, I know that our music has been pirated (punters have told me that their mate won't buy a CD because they'll just copy it and I expect most wouldn't say) but there's no way of tracking it. [/quote] I would be pleased if someone liked my music enough to copy and share it, they are spreading the word and that can lead to more lucrative forms of income in the long run. You can't stop it anyway and being sour about it won't change anything. [quote]That's obviously a business model that works well for your band, that's nice for you but it doesn't work for all bands and it definitely wouldn't work for mine.[/quote] How do you know that? It works for thousands of other bands and it doesn't mean you should stop doing what you are already doing. [quote]File sharing is here to stay, I've already said that. I couldn't disagree with your last statement more though. One individual is part of the human race, if enough people agree with something, then that's what forces change. If you really believe that statement, I assume you don't vote either because you're just an individual and your opinion doesn't matter and you think that activists like Martin Luther King etc should've kept quiet because they were just one person?[/quote] You assume too much, but perhaps you are right and you along with all your supporters will stop file sharing. I sincerely hope not, it will be a dark day for mankind.
  18. [quote name='flyfisher' timestamp='1361611942' post='1988166'] Why not move on and deal with the world as it is instead of wishing it was different. [/quote] I absolutely agree with this. Why is it the people who are least affected by file sharing seem most upset by it? Thom - how much is your band actually losing as a result of file sharing? My band has all it's music available for free download and we have received international airplay and good gigs as a direct result - these have brought in more money than selling a few CDs at gigs, (which we still do of course). File sharing is hear to stay whether you like it or not and individuals agreeing or disagreeing with it isn't going to change anything.
  19. [quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1361201522' post='1982641'] There's a gun in this house. Maybe i should grab it and start firing shells off everywhere? y'know, it's within my means, so why not? [/quote] As long as you remember to focus I don't know why you are getting so upset about something that is beyond all our control and doesn't affect you or anyone you know. Things are as they are, the world has changed and it will keep changing, so why not relax, accept the reality and make the most of it? Just a well meant suggestion - I don't want to argue and I'm afraid to upset you, especially now I know you're armed
  20. [quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1361190334' post='1982391'] Ok, so just focus on the part where i said it wasn't the point? [/quote] Focusing..........
  21. [quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1361186965' post='1982310'] But this still isn't the purpose of this thread. [/quote] Sorry, I was just reacting to your previous comments about how musicians can make money from the digital economy. I didn't mean to derail your thread. I'll shut up now, because I'm obviously getting on your nerves by disagreeing with you.
  22. [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1361187918' post='1982335'] Out of interest how much of your current "success" is built on your previous 10 years at EMI and contacts you made in the business from that time? [/quote] None and I didn't claim to be 'successful'. I was just giving some examples of how the new digital economy can work for musicians if they accept it. I don't know why I bother
  23. I have been writing and recording music for many years including 10 years signed to EMI. Now I produce music with a band on basic gear in my front room. We make our own CDs to sell at gigs and via other outlets. We don't sell as many as I used to, but we make more money than we would if a record label was taking the lion's share and all our profits go straight to us. We give away our music freely for anyone wanting to download it and this has led to airplay and gigs in various new territories. Airplay has always been the most lucrative form of income for most musicians like me, currently the BBC pay approx. £15 per minute for radio One and around £1.00 per minute for local stations. There are many thousands of radio stations all over the world and I receive revenue from Japan, USA, Europe and the far east, mostly due to people hearing our music from free downloads. Only last night, I had an email from a national radio station offering to play our music - I will inform PRS and they will collect our royalties. We also play gigs and festivals, for which we receive fees and PRS royalties, which increase with the size of gig. There are other ways of making money in the music business, but this model suits us and we are in total control of it. There are many other musicians like us, using the new models to produce and distribute their music, instead of moaning about the good old days. I believe this is the best time ever to be a musician, with so many ways to take control and get your music heard. We would have been amazed back in the 70s to think this would be possible and I am happy to be part of the revolution. We don't do it to make money and we are not rich, but we are happy
  24. This topic seems to come up quite regularly on here and it's interesting how attitudes have changed. The first time I entered this debate here was about 3 years ago and I was in a minority and got attacked from all sides for my views. Now, the tide has changed, with more folks accepting the changes and I am pleased. Not because I want to 'win' an argument on the internet, but because it reflects a wider acceptance in society. File sharing is part of a greater revolution in our culture, which gives me hope for all our futures - power to the people
  25. [quote name='MiltyG565' timestamp='1361138115' post='1981802'] Oh, nobody really, just record companies, the people who work with record labels and the music industry in general. [/quote] So why does this upset you so much? Do you think the music industry appreciates your concern? Record companies need to adapt and they have plenty of money to do so, but they seem to prefer throwing it away in a futile attempt to turn the clocks back. The music industry in general will be fine, if it adapts and makes the most of new technology. We are seeing a revolution and there is no going back.
×
×
  • Create New...