[quote name='Antiloco' timestamp='1360222270' post='1966794']
What you say sounds pretty fair except for the simple fact that the meaning of words is not subjective.
"Entertainment is something that holds the attention and interest of an audience, or gives pleasure and delight. It can be an idea or a task, but is more likely to be one of the activities or events that have developed over thousands of years specifically for the purpose of keeping an audience's attention." -Wiki
So you should ask yourself: How pure is something that's made with the sole purpose of satisfying an audience?
Don't play the arrogance card on me, it's getting pretty old and tired by now.
[/quote]
I can get where you're coming from, but look at the word "entertain". In part, it means "to provide someone with enjoyment". That someone could be you, me or the dog, it makes no odds.
If art isn't made for someone to enjoy, then what is it's purpose?
The opposite of entertain is "to bore" or "reject". If art isn't there to entertain, is it there to bore?