NancyJohnson

Because this is a bass that's not so important in the scheme of things, I don't mind throwing a little money/time at it in the spirit of exploration. Wiring it VT/VT > switch > output jack, should give me different tonal characteristics/properties than going the V/V/T route and applying a singular tone over both pickups. (I have five holes in the front of the bass so I figure I can just fill them up with knobs, why not?). I need to go through my box of spares. I know I have some .047 caps. Not sure whether I have any CTS 250K pots.

I have an 80s Ibanez Roadster project. Twin pickup model (P/J); if you're familiar with the model you'll recall it originally carried an active circuit - which was long gone when I bought the bass - it currently looks like this: At present, each pickup is wired into a volume pot, then into a selector switch (predominantly so I could just isolate the P-pickup), but at some point I want to wire a tone pot into the circuit. I'm wondering whether I might get something different tonally if I wire each pickup to its own tone pot, then into the selector, then out to the output jack. More Rickenbacker stylee than Jazz bass. Opinions?

I've got a P/J in the Ibanez. It's got very basic wiring, each pickup goes through a volume pot, then into a pickup selector switch. No tone controls. Sounds fine.

Arturia Minilab 3?

Been using Josi's pickups for yonks and currently have them in an old Ibanez Roadster project and I have a P94 in the neck position of an Epiphone Phantomatic (this had a P94 in the bridge, but I pulled it out as I wanted something hotter). Have used his zebra humbuckers in another project. If I needed to replace any pickups, I honestly wouldn't hesitate in going to Josi as a first port of call.

Happy is a little divisive. I'm never 100% happy with my kit, right now let's just say I'm content. I have a Darkglass AO900 and a pair of DG 1x12s; I don't tend to stray off the settings I have dialled in. It's loud enough, lightweight, portable. I have seven basses that do everything I want them to do. Four active, three passive. I'm as happy with the most expensive one as I am with the cheapest (c.£5.5K difference); they're all as gnarly as each other. Zero GAS.

They're used for extracting £££ from bassists that believe hype and nonsensical add-on products. Think of all those bassists out there that use(d) their fingers. Did Geddy Lee use a ramp? Mick Karn? Entwistle? Bruce? Flea? Jamerson? Kaye? Jaco?

My old band regularly gigged in and around London with a band of younglings called Dronningen...there's a couple of people here who tried out for them. They'd carry everything on these little trollies and use public transport, guitars and amps, bits of drumkits, etc; they carry the absolute minimum. Whether this would work for them if they were playing in the middle of Herefordshire is debatable, but in London it's doable.

It's not a thing, no. Well, it might be if you have some kind of affliction where your hands are the size of a red crab, but no, it's not a thing.

People! Please stop screwing needless/useless/nonsensical 'upgrades' onto your basses. Bass player #1; "Leo got it right!" Bass player #2; "What this bass needs is a ramp, a scrunchy thing around the nut, a drop-D tuner and a @Stub Mandrel Tone Shim."

It was kind of refreshing that Music Man just made instruments and didn't really see the necessity to move (so much) into the whole vintage reissue market. The market prices for 70s Stingrays us more than a bit erratic; just look at Reverb, there's a few chancers selling at £6k and above but nobody is biting. There's quite a few sold at £1.8k-£3k, which is quite a broad range. These new models are $3.2k (so read that as £3.2k+ over here); why would anyone consider forking over that kind of money when it's feasible - if you bide your time - to get an original 70s model for less £££?

The irony here is that there would actually be someone who would buy these if they were available to purchase. By someone, I actually mean, lots of people. Time to fire up the computer and set up a Kickstarter campaign. 😂

If you've read enough if my posts, you'll know my stance on swapping out pickups, especially if they're actually functioning without issue. At this point, I suppose it's worth looking at the bass itself; I'll try and be the voice of reason here as we all suffer this affliction of throwing £££ at 'upgrades'. The Q4s are selling on the used market at (Reverb) £200-400, which actually surprised me. Until I saw what they're selling for, I was going to suggest sticking a John East Uni-Pre 4 in it, but at £220 well, you can do the maths. If you went the upgrade path and sold the old/original pickups, you're still going to be potentially £100 (or more) out of pocket. (Do the maths, again.) End of the day, you've pretty much made a decision here. Me, I'd be thinking, 'Do I love this bass enough to throw a bunch of money at it to make it something it's not and understand I'm never going to make any of that money back if I decide to sell it on because I'm still not happy?'

The Lekato is fine. Easy everything really, charging, size, range and so on. Unaffected by active/passive/shim material.

Screws made of lard are my favourite.

Aah, Callan. Heard nothing but good about their business cards. I believe Likkle Sickly Kitteh cards might be an apt replacement.

Seriously now, it honestly makes zero difference what a shim is made of. I've shimmed basses a few times (before I knew how to set up a bass properly) and have used a playing card, breakfast cereal box, perspex, old credit card etc. There's this perceived thing about sustain. Let's address this first. How long do you let your notes ring out for? Ten seconds? 20? For the love of god, forget about sustain. I have no idea what music you play, but if you're doing anything where your tempo is less than say two beats a minute, you're not going to notice anything, if at all. Tone. Ack. Are you a solo bass player, treading the boards alone? Probably not. Any (perceived) change of tone from your choice of shim material will be net zero; you'll want to hear something and will convince yourself things are different, but they won't be. If you're in a band, any (perceived) nuances in tone will be lost completely. If you're playing live, seriously, nobody in the audience cares about your hardwood shim or whether you're apparently getting more whump/ponk/whatever.

Tone? From your hands, bonny lad.

Not that anyone is remotely interested, but I have tomorrow off, we've cracked open a rather nice bottle of red and are listening to Max Richter's reinterpretation of The Four Seasons. Both versions. It's freaking superb.

Meh, meh and meh.

Feasible that you just got lucky and the wood is doing the job of keeping the neck straightish without the truss rod being cranked.

Buy which one you want. Industry standard? Bwahaha. No. Nothing matters any more.

Not in the slightest. Pretty much every band I followed in my youth are (sadly) still out there doing it in some capacity or another and I honestly wish they weren't. It simply dilutes any legacy. I want to remember Vince Neil trying to sing in tune as a skinny drug-riddked brat, not trying to sing in tune as a soberish bloated guy in his middle-60s. Little interest in revisting any of these bands (or singers fronting new line-ups) live, either. Read my post on page 7 of this thread:

It's odd, when I was a kid, it was all 18-30 holidays, the original supermodels, yuppies and so on. All these people are now pushing 60 (at least) and they're all desperately looking to hold onto something from their youth. Look at Kiss, Simmons is 75 or something, Madonna is 65, Nikki Sixx is 64, same goes Joe Elliot. Vince Neil 62 and despite his stomach surgery, he lumps around like a beached pilot whale and still can't sing. I love early Motley and was a huge fan of Kiss until about 1980, but there's no merit whatsoever in what they're doing now and it just p*sses over whatever remains of their legacy. I'm not being ageist, but if that was mum up there doing what Madonna is doing, I'd be horrendously embarrassed. There is nothing remotely sexy or alluring about what she's doing, despite what she probably thinks. Thing is, nobody has got the strength to tell these people that it's time to stop, give it up and go live off your millions. But hey, there's always one more payday.