Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
Scammer alert: Offsite email MO. Click here to read more. ×

Count Bassie

Member
  • Posts

    641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Count Bassie

  • Birthday 02/07/1961

Personal Information

  • Location
    Rhode Island, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

1,758 profile views

Count Bassie's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Great Content Rare
  • Basschat Hero Rare

Recent Badges

133

Total Watts

  1. Thanks @BassBodfor the Stuart Watson rec, we have corresponded and I'm going to get my tech guy to have a chat with him. At this point the amp has been brought back to the bench, opened up and its contents partially laid out on a piece of plywood... I'm hoping this comes to a happy end soon. I'll post when it's up and running. I'm saving my 135 lb Ampeg PR410HLF for it... 🙂
  2. I'll look him up! Thanks!
  3. It's still in pieces, back in the bench after feeling it wouldn't get loud enough. Getting it back pretty soon for another run...
  4. That's a little booger! Cool that it's nicely proportioned though. Get those fret sprouts filed though... Not cool to bleed all over the carpet! 😁
  5. I think this game could be more fun if another rule were added.
  6. You know there might be more than I've been led to believe, but it's possible this amp had been serviced with non-spec'd or alternate parts- which might have to do with why the output is so anemic. I'm not the tech though, and life's too short for some things... Also, as far as I've been able to find, there seems to be no Mk IV schematic in existence. ? Trace Elliot has a rabbit hole of hardly documented work. Thanks again for the files though!
  7. Yes, this one's a 250.
  8. Yep, this set goes back to the Mk V, and there are some significant differences between it and the Mk IV. Thank you for sending those though! I've downloaded them and I'll bet there will be another old tank added to the pile within the year, 😁. 👍
  9. I'm all about it, I'll look them up. Thanks again Matt! (Sent him a mssg... Ashdown, Peavey and BAS next...)
  10. Apparently there are some meaningful differences. The MK IV diverged from the MK V in the preamp I think, that's the report. He's been, as I say, reverse-engineering his way through some of it. I'm hoping to eventually get to someone who was part of the design team from that period.
  11. Alright then... My tech has the amp opened up again, as the volume doesn't seem to be what it should. Apparently the signal travels from several points between the power section and the preamp, and the preamp is quite complicated. At this point the gain on the preamp has to be all the way up to get even moderately significant volume. The model I have, the MK IV, doesn't have a schematic or any kind of plan available, so I'm starting to dig in and see if I can talk to any of the people who had a hand in the early designs. So far my tech has been essentially reverse-engineering his way through the amp, and it's exhaustive. I'd be very interested in hearing about any sources of first-hand info about the MK IV'S design. Thanks! It's off to Ashdown...
×
×
  • Create New...