Al Krow

Based on the pricing of Noble gear, particularly their preamps, you have to be profligate to be noble these days. You're definitely both 😁

Hahaha! I'll have you know I'm 7 weeks into a gear detox regime and it's been very cathartic! And even managed to outlast far worthier musos than myself on the GAC 2020 such as the noble (but somewhat profligate) @FinnDave 😁

Bit of an aside, but you've summarised my bass tone journey in a nutshell! I really enjoy and appreciate nuances of bass tone at home. In a band mix they're lost. Then put on decent ear protection on top and, as you rightly say, "not a chance" except for stuff that is pretty in your face (eg dirt, filter, synth). So it then boils down to what @chris_b and others have been banging on about for years - being a really good bass player is much much more in the fingers and technique than in the gear your using. So I've concluded: more time at the fretboard and less time fretting about gear!

Well we can put you on the wait list for 2021 GAC then. My space will certainly be free in 10 months and 1 week's time 😂

FoM changes will obviously have a broad impact. No one is debating that. If if didn't, then we wouldn't have had a massive national debate. Whether it's going to be for good or ill time will tell. Imposition of visa requirements on overseas creatives coming to the UK? Doubt if Joe Public is going to notice anything much at all, irrespective of what they have had to drink and how full their glasses are.

We do, Dave, we do in oh so many ways.

Dave it's not your fault at all, no it really isn't. Please don't blame yourself or beat yourself up about this. The blame must squarely be laid at the door of the educational establishment for not making clear what the meaning of the word "abstinence" was when it had the opportunity. The failure is more truly one of society as a whole, and your conscience should be absolved entirely. You never stood a chance, mate. It's shameful. We all must bear part of the guilt.

Nah, storm in a tea cup. A £110 biliion industry is not going to be impacted except at the margin by a few visas on musicians or other artists / creatives coming to the UK. Seriously, exactly what is going to collapse / not happen if non-UK creatives have to get a visa? Is the US creative industry in tatters because it has visas? No, I didn't think so.

A £110 billion creative industry is not going to be impacted, other than at the tiniest margin, by the introduction of visas for overseas musicians coming to the UK. The US has much higher barriers to entry, and I don't see any sign of its creative industry collapsing. The gripe here is that the EU will respond in kind and that's going to mean the loss of work for UK musicians travelling to the EU.

Well actually I didn't, although the US hasn't done too badly I have to agree! But I wasn't aware of it being a union of separate nations? A union of states but not a union of countries (ie nations). And they did have the small incident of an internal spat in 1861, which resulted in 600,000+ deaths. We've not really had anything comparable in the last couple of hundred years between the nations of the UK. They've led the planet in pop and rock though. And have a pretty brutal visa regime for In-bound musicans...

What's your PhD on?

Haha they would wouldn't they - it goes against everything they were previously saying? But come on let's be balanced - it's just an example of import substitution; but seriously if you're not happy / worried with the broader point being made then you need first seek to shut down the post I was responding to which raised a valid concern about the "wider economy and who is going to work in the health service, care homes, pick fruit, etc…" Why only challenge the half of the discussion that you disagree with?

Soz, back to glass half full mode! The answer is what Maude outlined in his earlier post. Ok he describes this as "simplistic" but he does himself down - it's a well recognised economic concept of import substitution. Neither Nissan (nor the Project Fear brigade) wanted this leaking, but in the event of WTO terms trade deal at the end of the year they have a Plan B: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/feb/03/nissan-eu-uk-hard-brexit (I'll try to limit my sources to left-of-centre rags otherwise it will be dismissed as propaganda. But it's not 😁). For me that's a classic example of import substitution and nimble behaviour when seeing an opportunity to grow their business. As you say, the alternative is limiting ambitions and / or going out of business. I have to agree with @ambient though, as musicians, we're at risk of being culturally poorer, although tbf I can't think of too many EU bands (well actually any) I would prefer to spend my time going to see over UK and US bands - but I appreciate that's just my taste in rock music.

Ah come on, let's not start making up history. At the time of IndeyRef1 who knew that the UK, as a whole, would vote to leave the EU two years later? There were no lies told on that score. The facts on the ground subsequently changed. And tbf that is arguably good grounds for IndeyRef2. Scotland will get another IndeyRef for sure, and probably keep having them until the people of Scotland deliver the "correct" answer - or will the next one be the deciding one which folk will agree to abide by for a generation? But don't assume if Scotland leaves the most successful, and 300 year old, union of any nations, the EU will then welcome Scotland back with open arms. Small issue of Catalonia means that the Spanish veto will be critical.

@BigRedX I think the choices are: (i) do nothing and you guarantee nothing will change; (ii) fight for your cause and if you fail then at least you've tried; (iii) if the new rules stay in place despite our collective best efforts, then you have to learn to live with them. Change happens all the time. When it does you have to adapt or go the way of the dinosaurs; it's the way of the world. Nokia was the largest mobile phone maker at the turn of the century. Spotify didn't even exist then. Woolworths were still on our high streets. Just three examples. We are where we are, it's a case of making the most of it. If that's an optimistic philosophy then I'm guilty as charged.

Haha I do indeed (and am even foolhardy enough to make a contribution to the leading left wing 'rag' for balance given that it doesn't have a pay wall unlike the right of centre 'broadsheets'). But please do provide the correct figures, if those I cited were wrong.

Frankly there is no need for us to put these visa requirements and costs on overseas musicians coming to the UK. FWIW the US has much higher barriers to entry and it has not killed its music scene there or more relevantly the music scene in Canada (unless I am mistaken about the latter). The relationship between Canada and the US is, in fact, a very good proxy for the relationship between the UK and EU, although we are significantly bigger economically, relatively speaking and also in absolute terms, than Canada is to the US. It's not as though I'm hearing cries of "oh great this will mean more work for British musicians". If you feel strongly about this, then be political! Write to your MPs and, as a musician, ask them why they are introducing this or ask them to challenge the government on this if they are an opposition MP. A letter received is considered to represent the views of a thousand constituents. @ambient @peteb - you chaps travel abroad to play a lot (something I have never done, I'm just a London and SE local performer). Why not put your heads together and draft a pro-forma letter that other folk can cut and paste? Maybe musicians unions are already on the case? The truth may be more subtle than we realise eg this is being set up so that it can be bargained away in return for the EU not doing the same. Who knows. But great if UK musicians made it clear that they don't need their manor protected in this way. No point shouting at the tide not to come in. Much better to build a flood barrier. PS just seen @DoubleOhStephan's post above which seems to have landed on exactly the same conclusion.

I know, I know But you could have at least quoted two posts relating to any point on opposing sides, for balance, of a thus-far very civilised debate which I think we are all enjoying and maybe even at risk of 'hearing' each other! The topic is indeed a big one and it doesn't fall into classic left / right territory. Face it - the B word is having a knock on to us BC'ers as musicians which it has been very good to understand, encompassing economics, culture, travel and the environment to name some of the themes coming out.

@Rich agreed - but please be balanced in your quoting; I was merely responding to points on farming made by fellow BC'ers. Back to visas for musicians everyone.

Nope that is not the attitude I would sign up for at all. Being nimble and making the most of opportunities - yes! Making sure you take care of your countrymen who are left behind through no fault of their own, for whatever reason - also yes! (See my earlier comment about having Eur 75 billion in our back pocket to smooth the transition). We are already changing the basis on which we support our farmers. The NFU has given this a massive thumbs up - and everyone is agreed there is no way that this new policy which is going to be good for farmers and the environment could have been put in place whilst we had to obey the dictat of the CAP. It's already one of the best things to have emerged in the last 4 weeks.

Oh dear: one of you is worried that we will have to pay more and the other about paying less! There are there are going to be winners and losers when change happens. It's the way of things. The nimble see opportunities, others see crisis. We're about to embark on some major changes as a nation, that's not in dispute; no point screaming at the tide not to come in. That really is the crux of my position. Right time to be nimble and spend some time on the fretboard

@Woodinblack Morning fella! When I say "choose our neighbours" I was using the phrase metaphorically. In plain English: the existing inhabitants of every nation in the world have the right to determine their immigration policy. That is a fundamental character of nationhood. It is only the members of the EU that have waived that right under FoM. The consent of the British people was never sought when FoM was granted in the first place; an act of massive arrogance on the part of our ruling class which has led directly to where we are today. You know that I defer to you on all matters engineering and electronics but I'm afraid I think you have missed the point on the economics e.g. yes exports to the EU may account for 40% of our exports, but what proportion of total UK economic activity do total exports account for? It's not 100% or anything close is it? We do a great deal else in the UK besides just export. (So if all exports are 20% of UK GDP then exports to the EU are 8% of UK GDP). Similarly a comment like everything will be more expensive, well no! We get to choose, so we can drop import duties on goods and services from the rest of the world if we want to. Britain will now get to decide what works best for its economy and no longer have to put 30% tariffs on certain goods just so that this helps workers in e.g. southern Europe. Agreed. Just check what has happened to the Italian economy in the last 20 years due to its membership of the Eurozone.

Trouble is the dire warnings from the Treasury, IMF and BofE at the time have been shown to be a long way from reality and many of these so called experts are rapidly changing their tune (IMF - "UK will outpace Eurozone this year and next"; "could be some real upside" - Mark Carney last month). Exports to the EU account for just 8% of our economy. We run a £70 billion trade deficit every year with our EU neighbours and they get most of the fish in our fisheries. And import substitution works both ways. Going forward we won't have to have tariffs on the rest of the worlds goods and services any higher than we have with our EU neighbours - that's a real level playing field! You'll have read just today that the EU are struggling to even agree a budget, that's partly because they are missing Eur 75 billion from the UK over the next 7 years. And we will be able to pay our farmers what we like to cushion the transition - remember we're gonna have a spare Eur 75 billion in our back pocket for exactly such contingencies. So I think you're being far too pessimistic; but then you'll have probably gathered by now I'm a glass half full sort of guy! See my post just above