Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Al Krow

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    14,732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Al Krow

  1. My Mesa M6 has 'heft' in spades. I wouldn't describe my DG M900 as having it. I think @Lozz196 summarised it very well above. Sonically, for me it is do with the resonance, combination and dynamics of frequencies the amp is producing. The Mesa is more tonally complex and manages to have a powerful low end whilst not losing the rest of the frequency range. The DG is cleaner sounding without the microtubes engaged, and whilst more complex with it engaged, as with many dirt pedals loses a little low end.
  2. So I think of it as being: "Full bodied" "punchy" tone The opposite of anemic Certainly not bland It hits you in the gut and you know its there!
  3. Congrats on the new acquisition and joining the expanding BC Stomp club! When's yours due or have you got your hands on it already?
  4. So looks aren't necessarily first or foremost for me with a bass, but they're definitely an important factor, particularly if I'm spending a lot on a bass and if it has a 'wow' factor in terms of look, finish and feel, that's a real plus! I thought @stingrayPete1977 put it really well when he said that a white / black / burst etc. bass isn't pretending to be anything other than what it is. A relic'd bass clearly is. BUT if it makes its owner happy then wtf guys. Move on, life's too short.
  5. The other brand that has recently caught my eye, due to the sheer 'classical' elegance of its design, is Zon Sonus. Never played one (although I note that the bass gallery has one in the commercial items for sale currently). Does anyone have experience (plus or minus) with Zon basses?
  6. Well now you have, I'll have to fess I loved the Pickets' acapella version, as clearly did a lot of other folk given it made it to #1.
  7. My experience was that The T16 had really tight (negligible latency) tracking and a really good tone (particularly with clean blend) but started glitching around the G on the low E string. That's the other point when discussing tracking with octavers, just so we are all on the same page. There are two tracking parameters: - how tightly it tracks (minimal latency); - how low it tracks. Then need to overlay what tone you're after: - OC2 synthy - organic (mirrors the tone of the 'clean')
  8. If your question is what tracks better than the MXR BOD and has at least or better organic / authentic tone, then the answer is probably not much! Maybe Peter's new MXR Vintage OD (big thread on TB about this) or if you want an OC2 synthy tone, then the Valeton OC-10 is worth considering. There's also a lot of love for the 3 Leaf Octabvre Mk2. Have you not found anything on the Helix that comes close to MXR BOD for tracking + organic sounding?
  9. As borne witness by the subsequent posts, can I just say that my short answer to your Q was completely on the money! 😂 😂😂😂
  10. MXR BOD has a raft of complaints about its helicopter noise. No one has actually bought the MXR Vintage (AFAIK) on BC so the jury is still out on that one. And IMO there are two pedals that have better reputation for low tracking. One of them is the clear winner (based on reputation) but not popular at all due to weak subs, and the other is a massive best seller (And btw it's not COG).
  11. I agree. Low B string is LOW!! And I've definitely come round to your thinking that anything below that isn't particularly useful. However you don't want your octaver glitching all over the shop either.
  12. But it has the highest cut-off for its good tracking (around a low A) before it starts glitching, of any of the octavers. It's core octave sound is so 'organic' / good, however, that can largely offset this in terms of it being 'loved'. Next.
  13. That does show the continuing power of TV and film as an 'influencer' . Did Glee actually 'release' their covers or just perform them as part of their shows? Similar point about Shrek and Hallelujah earlier.
  14. Aha - well that just further proves my ignorance then! But methinks we have identified a gap in the market between us. And suitably tweaked I KNOW it could be great for metal.
  15. Well you're the one who brought them up in your earlier post! 😎
  16. Consensus seems to be that: 1) a sub woofer could work with a band PA, and a few folk manage to use it well in that context; 2) you almost certainly wouldn't use it as part of bass backline as an adjunct to your amp and cab; 3) fact is most professional PAs will have sub woofers delivering the low end for bass and kick drum; 4) 10" and 12" cabs are the most popular size and folk who argue that 5" cabs can still do the business just as well, somehow all have 10" or 12" speakers themselves. This is purely down to economics; 5) bumble bees shouldn't fly and Usain Bolt shouldn't be fast. But he is. Although he's not apparently going to be a great footballer, where his height would have been an a distinct advantage in the 6 yard box; 6) I have no idea where the dog stuff is going...
  17. Given that I'd never heard of a Rane DC-24 pedal, tilt EQ, tape saturation and parallel compression, I'm going back to the comfort zone of my TC Spectracomp 'out of the box' set at between 2 and 3 out of 10...😄 Btw "room balance" sounds much more user friendly than "tilt EQ". I actually do like what the TC does in putting a 'sheen' on my tone whereas my Keeley Bassist is very flat, which is absolutely fine for my use of it as an end of chain limiter, to protect against filter pedal signal spikes, but it doesn't float my boat as a compressor. Given that the Becos is aiming to be in the same family as the Keeley, I'd be interested to see if it was similarly "flat". I could still see me using the smaller Becos pedal as an end of chain limiter, (assuming the Stomp doesn't also make that redundant!), with a smaller form factor and greater functionality than my Keeley Bassist . Well all is about to be revealed as Ordep now has one...
  18. Sounds not dissimilar to how a tone pot might operate on a passive bass, just from its likely effect on the tone from what you're saying.
  19. Well if I recall correctly @HazBeenhas gone from Boss SYB - - > FI - - > full fat Helix. Although word on the street is that the Helix's weak spot is synth sims. So I'm not expecting my Stomp to evict my FI off my board, although it may well eliminate the rest, including providing a juicy filter squelch patch or two!
  20. @Leonard Smalls a nice quandary to find yourself in! I'm aware of two BCers who spent quality time with both pedals. Both moved the Boss SYB300 on and moved on to the FI. That kinda persuaded me to go straight to the FI! However, there is no way the FI could replace the rest of the pedals on my board - that job is going to fall largely to my Helix Stomp. So the fact that you think the Boss could be a one stop shop for you is definitely another point to include when weighing the two up.
×
×
  • Create New...