But where do you draw the line? Just about everything about the bass and bass player will go unnoticed by the average pub crowd unless they are other musicians, especially bass players themselves. Off the top of my baldy head this includes, but is not limited to;
5 string basses, active pre-amps, through-neck construction, 24 fret necks, the weight of your cab, the brand of bass/amp/cab/effects you are using, etc...
All of these are things that you have posted about at length over the years, as such they are important to you and you've spent a considerable amount of money on getting gear that meet your requirements. But, whether you like it or not, nobody else will notice or care unless as mentioned earlier, they are other bass players. These people who don't notice are the exact same people who don't notice if you are compressing or not.
So what makes compression any different? Yes it's subtle, but arguably more noticeable than the perceived benefits of a through neck, active bass against a traditional Fender design.
If we're speaking in abstract collectives, there are several folk on here that are actively extolling the benefits of compression and how it helps, how it makes you sit better in the mix, it adds a consistency to the bass sound that cannot be achieved by technique alone despite claims to the contrary. I ask again, If it makes the bass sit better and sound more professional, for want of a better vague description, why not use it?