Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

three

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

three last won the day on August 19 2024

three had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

three's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • Basschat Hero Rare
  • Great Content Rare

Recent Badges

1.3k

Total Watts

  1. Beautiful! Sadly, far too heavy and too long for me but looks like an absolute bargain - the usual fabulous ACG quality
  2. Great choice in my opinion - the Baby Sumo is a really impressive implementation of Class D. I've used a Tonehammer with some success, and a Mesa Subway+ preamp and DI - the latter was really impressive, though they're really difficult to find and are no longer in production. I've used all sorts of pres with the Baby Sumo (Warwick PR40, Monique, SF2) and they sound how you'd expect. I think I read somewhere that somebody had experienced some input gain problems with the Sumo, but I certainly haven't encountered any issues with signal. I haven't used an SBP-2, though if it's a pre that you know and favour, probably worth a try - I'm pretty sure the results are what you'd anticipate
  3. If you can find one - I wish I could - I'd recommend the Mesa Boogie Subway+ DI. I really shouldn't have sold mine. Two DIs (Mic and Line from memory) and real versatility in a well-built package
  4. three

    Alembic FL-105.

    It's the first I've heard or seen of these - possibly an interesting addition to the Alembic line-up, and something novel (I think) with the extra filter modes. I use an SF2 that appears to have a little more in terms of control/parameters, but I can see the pedal-type form factor appealing to some. It won't make any bass sound like an Alembic, but a useful tool for recording and live use. The Alembic filters (in the SF2 and probably in this box) offer a great deal of control and versatility. On a related issue, I've been playing for decades and have yet to meet an Alembic-playing dentist, though I do know a guitarist that gigs as a consultant gastroenterologist
  5. I've played through a lot of cabs, but this is an absolute standout - pretty much the perfect 210 for me. Solidity, presence, articulation, projection: a real physical punch that can be felt and heard, though rounded subtlety too if needed
  6. I live in the town (utter dump) and don’t think there’s any connection between SUYG and Tony - other than optimistic pricing for quite ordinary basses. Perhaps oddly, I don’t know Tony though I think he offers lessons. I haven’t seen him playing locally either. The town’s once thriving music scene crashed dramatically in the late ‘80s (along with its economy as a whole). I might go and have a mooch but can’t see anything that appeals, especially given the prices
  7. I've had a couple of these over the years (cherryburst and acquaburst) and they're lovely little basses - quite slender and relatively light. They also balance relatively well (for an Alembic). It's a good way to get into Alembic's filter system. Those I've owned were extremely well-built and solid - perhaps not quite as refined as the more expensive models, but very playable and classy, with piano-like tones on tap (as you'd expect). This looks like a lovely example, and especially so given its age
  8. Nice bass, nice playing, nice price (IMO)!
  9. I don’t remember the figuring being so spectacular on the neck of mine, though I’m pretty sure you’re right Andy – one way to be sure, would be to remove the bridge and check the string through arrangement. When I bought the bass, I noticed that the bridge was very slightly off centre. Martin at the Gallery re-positioned it for me and re-drilled the string through holes on a diagonal to retain the through stringing option. It all worked perfectly. Celinders can have their idiosyncracies!
  10. Absolutely beautiful - I've had a few Celinders including one very similar to this. There's something about the ergonomics of a Fender-type Celinder that I don't think any other luthier has matched. Wonderful
  11. If these are anything like as good as the Spector Shorty (no reason why they shouldn't be), they'll be superb if prohibitively expensive basses. I often wonder why the Shorty was discontinued (if indeed it was, though I haven't seen a new one for a long time). The Shorty came in a wide range of configurations, though didn't have the exquisite curves of the NS2 etc. I'd be interested to see the prices, though very unlikely to pay them.
  12. Fabulous - I had the plus version - the twin xlr outs are extremely useful in the real world (or at least they were for me).
  13. Thanks and yes, the absence of a ratio control (or any discussion of this) is a little curious. Or maybe not if the unit is primarily designed as a master. The replies are very useful - I may be looking in the wrong place with Caveman
  14. I’m not sure if there are many of these in circulation. Most of the video demonstrations, and especially that from Caveman, promote the unit as a back-end (end of chain) master compressor. It seems to work beautifully but it’s subtle. Has anybody tried using one as a front end, i.e., more as an effect than a master? Given the specification and parameters of the BC1, there doesn’t appear to be any reason why it shouldn’t work really well to squish and pump etc. Maybe I’ve missed some good videos, or somebody out there has real world experience?
  15. This is what I really like about BC - the best of it
×
×
  • Create New...