three

I use a Spector Shorty as my main bass - the Bantam is very similar if a little more rounded. The basses are light but probably around 8.5lbs (not super light). I’ve been struggling with back pain for the past two years - the Spector has not essed this. I’ve been working hard to get around the problem in the last three months as I’ve been playing more intensively and sitting hasn’t been an option. There’s been a lot of experimentation. Ia lot depends on the source of the pain but three things have helped me: 1. longer (comfort strapp) length - I’ve shifted from a very high position to something considerably lower - over tummy rather than lower chest 2. avoidance of schaller locks - I noticed that these shift the centre of gravity of the bass slightly and tip the top bout forward a little. They also invite me to hold the bass in place rather than just let it ‘sit’. Just the strap with Fender strap blocks makes a significant difference in positioning the bass more comfortably and keeping it there 3. Replacing cable with wireless - after 40 years, I’ve realised that I twist very slightly to avoid tangling or tripping on cables - with a wireless (transmitter in back pocket), my posture is more upright of course, all this is individual but it’s providing some relief for me. I play short scale most of the time but I don’t think it makes much difference in terms of discomfort. An Overwater PJ feels just as good with the adaptations listed sbove. Good luck - I can empathise!

I've had both (and an embarrassing list that includes many of the other contenders). As a direct comparison, the US Sadowsky had a slightly more expensive and cultured look and feel - the whole package (case, candy, hardware) just felt expensive. The Sadowsky pre is lovely - not dramatic but a professional, studio-style gloss right out of the box. The bass was also very light and comfortable, and capable of a very low action (if that's your kind of thing - it was highly adjustable). All that said, it didn't feel or sound particularly 'alive'. It was a bit 'ordinary', possibly anonyous for the price. However, that might be what makes Sadowskys so popular and desirable among big-name and session-players. Just an excellent Fender clone that feels familiar, is light and an can emulate a Fender tone (and then a bit). The Shuker was a much heavier but beautifully built instrument - somebody else's custom order that I bought second-hand. Excellent timbers, really good construction with top-quality fit and finish (in the main). Again, the circuit was Sadowsky, along with the pickups, so great tone on tap (if nothing extreme). Not as comfortable to play as the Sadowsky and suffered from some fret-sprout (an easy fix and nothing out of the ordinary - this is a feature of many Alembics - but a little frustrating). It was possible to feel and see where the extra money had gone into the Sadowsky (but maybe not the 1000-1200 at contemporaneous prices). The Shuker had its own elegance but was a little more chunky and workperson-like than its US counterpart. Overall tone was a little more aggressive but this is probably down to timbers and design. Hardware was high-quality sourced-in rather than in-house. Overall, both very good basses if not absolutely top-of-the-line game-changers. I picked-up the Shuker for around 1200 and the Sadowsky for maybe 1750 - prices have changed (obviously), At the time, the premium was probably justifiable. With current prices, I'm not at all sure. I'd have no hesitation in custom ordering from Jon. Excellent, professional instruments at realistic prices. Just to throw another curve in - Atelier may be worth consideration - some bargains appear on here (and excellent Japanese build quality).

Just bought a stand from Craig. Super packing, fast delivery, great communications and exactly as described - an upstanding and totally reliable member of the community!

I had a couple of early Allevas with the DN boards - both outstanding basses. Celinders are also worthy of consideration - again, some of the nicest Js I've tried. I had a US Sadowsky too - a very well-built bass with a great pre (and light) but it didn't match the Allevas or Celinder for me - just an issue of personal taste

Excellent idea - I'd do something similar but don't want to put another hole in the Alembic. Scrumpymike had a brilliant hand-crafted solution (involving advanced fabrication skills) - well-beyond me but a neat idea that isn't really feasible given production start-up costs (unfortunately). Back on topic - I took a look at the Rivoli, it looks beautiful!

Admired the Supros for some time and this post hasn’t done anything to relieve that. I’ll admit to some bias here, I’ve played a Gibson Ripper for much of the last 40 years. It’s a beautiful thing though not for everybody - a very big bass indeed. I’ve also played very many EB0s and EB3s – just a word of caution to try before you buy. The much discussed balance issues are very real. I play an Alembic Brown Bass too (an EB3 clone) and it’s almost impossible for me on a strap (though lovely if playing sat down). Some of the high-end Epiphones are worth consideration and should only swallow half of the budget (change for a hipshot bridge!)

You can get a short-scale Alembic to sound like that (honestly) but probably less expensive to simply buy the Burns

If it's possible, I'd try the cabs paired with a Berg B Amp (with and without the amp's CN profiles). I think Berg are certainly on to something with the B Amp - there's a very versatile drive in the software too if necessary. I think that Dood's words are wise ones - the B Amp could be an excellent solution, and great cabs if you can get them to work for your needs.